Skip to main content

A Comparison of Two Data Acquisition Techniques for Modal Strain Identification from Sub-microstrain FBG Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Structures (EVACES 2017)

Abstract

The identification of changes in the dynamic characteristics which are related to structural damage is the core principle of the vibration-based structural health monitoring (VBSHM). By addressing these changes, engineers can acquire valuable information about the condition of structures. Eigenfrequencies are influenced by environmental factors and this influence can be high enough to completely mask the effect of damage while they are also global structural characteristics and they cannot asses the location of the damage. A promising alternative is the monitoring of modal strains which offers the benefit of high sensitivity to local damage. However, current measurement techniques encounter difficulties in capturing the very small strain (sub-microstrain) levels that occur during ambient or operational excitation with sufficient accuracy and precision.

This research aims to accurately identify the modal strains of a steel I-beam from sub-microstrain data using Fiber-optic Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors. For this purpose, two measurement techniques are compared. In the first, an interrogator that measures all sensors simultaneously and saves the wavelength spectra for further processing is used. A novel signal processing algorithm that identifies the Bragg wavelength shift from low-resolution data with high accuracy and precision is used for processing the spectral data into strain values. In the second, an interrogator that scans each sensor individually with a high-speed sweep and therefore offers a high wavelength resolution is used. The peak-shifts from the reflected wavelength are identified with a built-in peak detection algorithm and subsequently converted into strains. The phase shift that is created between the various FBG sensors due to the sweep is resolved by implementing a novel synchronization technique.

The accuracy of both techniques in identifying the beam’s dynamic characteristics is investigated through an experimental modal analysis. Two chains of multiplexed FBGs directly glued to the flanges of the beam are used as sensors. The beam is excited at low force amplitudes to explore the ability to identify dynamic characteristics from very low Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) data. Finally, the accuracy of the identified strain mode shapes from the two techniques is assessed by comparison with a validated finite element model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective. Wiley, West Sussex (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodrigues, C., Félix, C., Lage, A., Figueiras, J.: Development of a long-term monitoring system based on FBG sensors applied to concrete bridges. J. Eng. Struct. 32(8), 1993–2002 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brownjohn, J.M.W., Stefano, A., Xu, Y.L., Wenzel, H., Aktan, E.: Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: challenges and successes. J. Civil Struct. Health Monit. 1(3–4), 79–95 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deraemaeker, A., Reynders, E., De Roeck, G., Kullaa, J.: Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. J. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22(1), 34–56 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peeters, B., De Roeck, G.: One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 30(2), 149–171 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Unger, J.F., Teughels, A., De Roeck, G.: Damage detection of a prestressed concrete beam using modal strains. J. Struct. Eng. 131(9), 1456–1463 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glisic, B., Inaudi, D.: Fibre Optic Methods for Structural Health Monitoring. Willey, Chichester (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Glisic, B.: Performance and health monitoring of civil structures and infrastructure using long-gauge and distributed fiber optic sensors. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Trento, Italy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roveri, N., Carcaterra, A., Sestieri, A.: Real-time monitoring of railway infrastructures using fibre Bragg grating sensors. J. Mech. Syst. Sign. Process. 60–61, 14–28 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anastasopoulos, D., Moretti, P., Geernaert, T., De Pauw, B., Nawrot, U., De Roeck, G., Berghmans, F., Reynders, E.: Identification of modal strains using sub-microstrain FBG data. J. Mech. Syst. Sign. Process. 86, 58–74 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamberti, A., Vanlanduit, S., De Pauw, B., Berghmans, F.: A novel fast phase correlation algorithm for peak wavelenght detection of fiber Bragg grating sensors. J. Optics Exp. 22(6), 7099–7112 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maes, K., Reynders, E., Rezayat, A., De Roeck, G., Lombaert, G.: Offine synchronization of data acquisition systems using system identification. J. Sound Vib. 381, 264–272 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynders, E., Houbrechts, J., De Roeck, G.: Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. J. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 29, 228–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynders, E., Schevenels, M., De Roeck, G.: MACEC 3.3: A Matlab toolbox for experimental and operational modal analysis, User’s manual, Report BWM-2014-06. Department of Civil Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reynders, E., de Roeck, G.: Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. J. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22(3), 617–637 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper has been performed within the framework of the project G099014N “Identification and modeling of structural damage”, funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Belgium. Kristof Maes is a postdoctoral fellow of KU Leuven. The financial support of FWO and KU Leuven is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Anastasopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anastasopoulos, D., Maes, K., De Roeck, G., Reynders, E. (2018). A Comparison of Two Data Acquisition Techniques for Modal Strain Identification from Sub-microstrain FBG Data. In: Conte, J., Astroza, R., Benzoni, G., Feltrin, G., Loh, K., Moaveni, B. (eds) Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Structures. EVACES 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67443-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67443-8_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67442-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67443-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics