A Neural Regression Framework for Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) Denoising

  • Michael Green
  • Edith M. Marom
  • Nahum Kiryati
  • Eli Konen
  • Arnaldo MayerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10530)


In the last decade, the technological progress of multi-slice CT imaging has turned CCTA into a valuable tool for coronary assessment in many low to medium risk patients. Nevertheless, CCTA protocols expose the patient to high radiation doses, imposed by image quality and multiple cardiac phase acquisition requirements. Widespread use of CCTA calls for significant reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high image quality as required for coronary assessment. Denoising algorithms have been recently applied to low-dose CT scans after image reconstruction. In this work, a fast neural regression framework is proposed for the denoising of low-dose CCTA. For this purpose, regression networks are trained to synthesize high-SNR patches directly from low-SNR input patches. In contrast to published methods, the denoising network is trained on real noise directly learned from noisy CT data rather than assuming a known parametric noise model. The denoised value for each pixel is computed as a function of the synthesized patches overlapping the pixel. The proposed algorithm is compared to state-of-the-art published algorithms for synthetic and real noise. The feature similarity index (FSIM) achieved by the proposed method is superior in all the comparisons with other methods, for synthetic radiation dose reductions higher than 90%. The results are further supported qualitatively, by observing a significant improvement in subsequent coronary reconstruction performed by commercial software on denoised images. The fast and high quality denoising capability suggests the proposed algorithm as a promising method for low-dose CCTA denoising.


  1. 1.
    Panetta, D.: Advances in X-ray detectors for clinical and preclinical computed tomography. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 809, 2–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stefanini, G.G., Windecker, S.: Can coronary computed tomography angiography replace invasive angiography? Circulation 131(4), 418–426 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, Z., Sabarudin, A.: Coronary CT angiography: state of the art. World J. Cardiol. 5(12), 442 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joemai, R.M., Geleijns, J., Veldkamp, W.J., de Roos, A., Kroft, L.J.: Automated cardiac phase selection with 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 191(6), 1690–1697 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang, D., Slomka, P., Nakazato, R., Woo, J., Berman, D.S., Kuo, C.-C.J., Dey, D.: Image denoising of low-radiation dose coronary CT angiography by an adaptive block-matching 3D algorithm. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green, M., Marom, E.M., Kiryati, N., Konen, E., Mayer, A.: Efficient low-dose CT denoising by locally-consistent non-local means (LC-NLM). In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9902, pp. 423–431. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Liao, P., Li, K., Zhou, J., Wang, G.: Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network. Biomed. Opt. Express 8(2), 679–694 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, F., Zhang, L., Yu, H.: External patch prior guided internal clustering for image denoising. In: IEEE ICCV (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2(5), 359–366 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNitt-Gray, M.F.: AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT: radiation dose in CT 1. Radiographics 22(6), 1541–1553 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., Zhang, D.: FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Green
    • 1
  • Edith M. Marom
    • 2
  • Nahum Kiryati
    • 1
  • Eli Konen
    • 2
  • Arnaldo Mayer
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations