Skip to main content

Expertise as a Mediating Factor in Conceptual Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Abstract

We use eye-tracking to better understand the notion of expertise in conceptual modeling of complex systems. This research-in-progress paper describes an ongoing experiment to exploit the capacity of eye-tracking to explore the significance of expertise as a mediating factor in conceptual modeling. The proposed methodology highlights the applicability, validity, and potential of well-established eye-tracking methods to measure the effects of expertise. By identifying the differences in the strategies that novices and experts use to search, detect, and diagnose errors, we anticipate being able to help define training curricula appropriate for each level to improve performance and model result quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brocke, V.J., Riedl, R., Léger, P.: Application strategies for neuroscience in information systems design science research. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 53(3), 1–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yeung, N., Botvinick, M.M., Cohen, J.D.: The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 111(4), 931 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moody, D.: The “physics” of notations: towards a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(5), 756–778 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Recker, J., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices design business processes. Inf. Syst. 37, 557–573 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, N., Schneider, W.: Brain changes in the development of expertise: neuroanatomical and neurophysiological evidence about skills-based adaptations. In: Ericsson, K., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 653–682. CUP, Cambridge, UK (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn. Sci. 11(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., Van de Weijer, J.: Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP Oxford, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hungerford, B., Hevner, A., Collins, R.: Reviewing software diagrams: a cognitive study. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(2), 82–96 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Léger, P.M., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J.: Emotions and ERP information sourcing: the moderating role of expertise. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 114(3), 456–471 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruer, J.: The Mind’s Journey from Novice to Expert. James S. McDonnell Foundation, Saint Louis, MO (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, C., Hufnagel, E.: Through the eyes of experts: a socio-cognitive perspective on the automation of fingerprint work. MIS Q. 31(4), 681–703 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., Brault Foisy, L-M.: Differences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricity. Mind Brain Educ. 8(1), 44–55 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bánáthy, B.: An information typology for the understanding of social systems. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 16(6), 479–494 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., Säljö, R.: Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 23(4), 523–552 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Van Gog, T.: In the eyes of the beholder: how experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learn. Instr. 20(2), 146–154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Law, B., Atkins, M., Kirkpatrick, A., Lomax, A.: Eye gaze patterns differentiate novice and experts in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment. In: Proceedings of the 2004 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, pp. 41–48. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yusuf, S., Kagdi, H., Maletic, J.I.: Assessing the comprehension of UML class diagrams via eye tracking. In: Program Comprehension, ICPC’07. 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pp. 113–122. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hevner, A., Davis, C., Collins, R., Gill, T.: A neurodesign model for IS research. Informing Sci. Int. J. Emerg. Transdiscipline 17, 103–132 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Léger, P.M., Sénecal, S., Courtemanche, F., de Guinea, A.O., Titah, R., Fredette, M., Labonte-LeMoyne, É.: Precision is in the eye of the beholder: application of eye fixation-related potentials to information systems research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(10), 651 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Riedl, R., Léger, P.M.: Fundamentals of NeuroIS. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuller, R., Davis, C.: Requirements elicitation techniques as communication channels: a framework to widen the window of understanding. In: Information Systems Analysis and Design: Foundations, Methods and Practices, Advances in Management Information Systems (AMIS) Monograph Series (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Davis, C.J., Hevner, A.R., Labonte-LeMoyne, É., Léger, PM. (2018). Expertise as a Mediating Factor in Conceptual Modeling. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67431-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics