Abstract
From the early sixth century of the common era to the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, two contemporary genres came to dominate Buddhist literature. On the one hand there were the schools of formal logic and epistemology whose textual tradition emerged out of the works of the Buddhist scholar Dignāga and his commentator Dharmakīrti. On the other, there were the esoteric textual traditions that would come to be known as the Buddhist tantras. These two are considered by many to have developed independently, with some scholars even going so far as to characterize the esoteric textual traditions as a protest movement intended to push back against the institutional scholasticism of post-Dignāga epistemological discourse. Relying upon a set of Sanskrit works by seven Indian tantric mahāsiddhas known in Tibetan sources as The Seven Siddhiḥ Texts or Grub pa sde bdun, this paper challenges the idea that the sophisticated esoteric ritual theory and praxis of the Buddhist yoga- and mahāyoga-tantras is necessarily incompatible with or antagonistic toward the Buddhist epistemological tradition by pointing to the basic soteriological issue that both factions held in common: the problem of how, when, and for whom ultimate reality, ineffible by definition, is able to be both perceived and communicated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acharya, Diwakar. Early Tantric Vaiṣṇavism: Three Newly Discovered Works of the Pañcarātra, The Svayambhvapañcarātra, Devāmṛtapañcarātra, and Aṣṭādaśavidhāna. Collection Indologie 129. Early Tantra Series 2. Institut Français de Pondichéry, École française d’Extrême-Orient, Asien-Afrika-Institut, Universität Hamburg. 2015.
Anaṅgavajra. Prajñopāyaviniścayasiddhi. in Guhyādi-Aṣṭasiddhi-saṅgraha. Edited by Samdhong Rinpoche and Vrajvallabh Dwivedi. Sarnath, Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, Rare Buddhist Texts Project, 1987.
Bronkhorst, Johannes. “Nāgārjuna and Apoha.” In Dharmakīrti’s Thought and Its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy, 17.
Bronkhorst, Johannes. Language and Reality: On an Episode in Indian Thought. trans. Michael S. Allen and Rajam Ragunathan. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
Cabezón, José I. Buddhism and Language. Albany: SUNY Press 1994.
Davidson, Ronald M. “Masquerading as Pramāṇa: Esoteric Buddhism and Epistemological Nomenclature.” In Dharmakīrti’s Thought and Its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference Hiroshima, November 406, 1997. edited by Shoryu Katsura. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999.
Davidson, Ronald M. Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 2002.
Freemantle, Francesca ed. and trans. “The Guhyasamāja Tantra: A Critical Study.” Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1971.
Granoff, Phyllis. “Other People’s Ritual: Ritual Eclecticism in Early Medieval Indian Religions.” In Journal of Indian Philosophy 28 no. 4 (2000).
Granoff, Phyllis. “My Ritual and My Gods: Ritual Exclusiveness in Medieval India.” In Journal of Indian Philosophy 29 no. ½ Special issue: Ingalls Festschrift (April 2001).
Gray, David. “Imprints of the ‘Great Seal:’ On the Expanding Semantic Range of the Term Mudrā in Eighth Through Eleventh Century Indian Buddhist Literature.” In Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 34 no. 1–2 (2012).
Hodge, Stephen trans. The Mahā-Vairocana-abhisaṃbodhi-tantra. London: Routledge; 2003.
Indrabhūti. “Jñānasiddhi” in Guhyādi-Aṣṭasiddhi-saṅgraha. Edited by Samdhong Rinpoche and Vrajvallabh Dwivedi. Sarnath, Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, Rare Buddhist Texts Project, 1987.
‘Jam dgon kong sphrul blo gros mtha’ yas, Karma bkra shis chos dpal, Zhwa dmar mi pham chos kyi blo gros, ed. Nges don phyag rgya chen po khrid mdzod. Delhi: Rnam par rgyal ba dpal zhwa dmar ba’i chos sde, 1997.
Jackson, Roger. “The Indian Mahāmudrā ‘Canon(s):’ A preliminary Sketch.” in Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies 9 (2009).
Kiss, Csaba ed. and trans. The Brahmayāmalatantra or Picumata Volume II, The Religious Observances and Sexual Rituals of the Tantric Practitioner: Chapters 3, 21, and 45. Collection Indologie 130. Early Tantra Series 3. Institut Français de Pondichéry, École française d’Extrême-Orient, Asien-Afrika-Institut, Universität Hamburg. 2015.
Kukla, André. Ineffability and Philosophy. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.
Matilal, Bimal Krishna. The Word and the World: India’s Contribution to the Study of Language. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Matsunaga, Yukei ed. The Guhyasamājatantra. Osaka, Japan: Toho Shuppan, Inc. 1978.
McCrea, Lawrence J. and Patil Paramal G. eds. and trans. Buddhist Philosophy of Language in India: Jñānaśrīmitra on Exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
Ogawa, Hideyo. “Bhartṛhari on Representations (buddhyākāra).” In Dharmakīrti’s Thought and Its Impact on Indian and Tibetan Philosophy: Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference Hiroshima, November 406, 1997. Edited by Shoryu Katsura. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999.
Padma dkar po. “Phyag rgya chen po’i man ngag gi bshad sbyar rgyal ba’i gan mdzod” In ‘Brug lugs chos mdzod chen mo 41 no. 1. Kathmandu: Drukpa Kagyu Heritage Project, 200?
Padmavajra. “Guhyasiddhi,” In Guhyādi-Aṣṭasiddhi-saṅgraha. Edited by Samdhong Rinpoche and Vrajvallabh Dwivedi. Sarnath, Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, Rare Buddhist Texts Project, 1987.
Sarbacker, Stuart. Samādhi: The Numinous and Cessative in Indo-Tibetan Yoga. Albany: SUNY Press, 2005.
Wedemeyer, Christian K. “Locating Tantric Antinomianism: An Essay Toward the Intellectual History of the ‘Practices/Practice Observance’ (caryā/caryāvrata).” In Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 34 no. 1–2 (2012).
Wedemeyer, Christian K. Making Sense of Tantric Buddhism: History, Semiology, and Transgression in the Indian Traditions. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
Weinberger, Steven. The Significance of Yoga Tantra and the Compendium of Principles (Tattvasamgraha Tantra) within Tantric Buddhism in India and Tibet. Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia, 2003.
White, David Gordon. Sinister Yogis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Wright, Roger. The Guhyasamāja Piṇḍikṛta-sādhana and its Context. Master’s thesis. London: SOAS 2010.
Yamada, Isshi ed. Sarva-tathāgata-tattva-saṃgraha nāma mahāyāna-sūtra: A Critical Edition Based on the Sanskrit Manuscript and Chinese and Tibetan Translations. New Delhi: Sharada Rani, 1981.
Yoginī Cintā. “Vyaktabhāvānugatatattvasiddhi.” in Guhyādi-aṣṭasiddhi-saṅgraha. Edited by Samdhong Rinpoche and Vrajvallabh Dwivedi. Sarnath, Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, Rare Buddhist Texts Project, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krug, A.C. (2018). Tantric Epistemology and the Problem of Ineffability in the Seven Siddhi Texts. In: Herat, M. (eds) Buddhism and Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67413-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67413-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67412-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67413-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)