Abstract
A Virtual Trainer (VT) for moral expertise development can potentially contribute to organizational and personal moral well-being. In a pilot study a prototype of the VT confronted university employees with a complaint from an anonymous student on unfair grading: a plausible scenario. Addressing criticisms from students may be a stressful situation for many teaching professionals. For successful training, adapting the agent’s strategy based on the performance of the user is crucial. To this end, we further recorded a multimodal dataset of the interactions between the participants and the VT for future analysis. Participants saw the value in a VT that lets them practice such encounters. What is more, many participants felt truly taken aback when our VT announced that a student was unhappy with them. We further describe a first look at the multimodal dataset.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carless, D.: Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 31(2), 219–233 (2006)
Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies—Why and how. Knowledge-Based Systems 6(4), 258–266 (1993)
Dane, E., Sonenshein, S.: On the role of experience in ethical decision making at work: An ethical expertise perspective. Organizational Psychology Review 5(1), 74–96 (2015)
DeTienne, K.B., Agle, B.R., Phillips, J.C., Ingerson, M.C.C.: The impact of moral stress compared to other stressors on employee fatigue, job satisfaction, and turnover: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 110(3), 377–391 (2012)
Gebhard, P., Baur, T., Damian, I., Mehlmann, G., Wagner, J., André, E.: Exploring interaction strategies for virtual characters to induce stress in simulated job interviews. In: Proc. of the 2014 Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Int. Found. for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 661–668 (2014)
Kolkmeier, J., Vroon, J., Heylen, D.: Interacting with virtual agents in shared space: single and joint effects of gaze and proxemics. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10011, pp. 1–14. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_1
Monin, B.B., Pizarro, D.A., Beer, J.S.: Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology 11(2), 99 (2007)
Roosevelt, M.: Student expectations seen as causing grade disputes. The New York Times, December 13, 2009
Sinnott-Armstrong, W.: Moral dilemmas. Wiley Online Library (1988)
Waters, J.A., Bird, F.: The moral dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics 6(1), 15–22 (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kolkmeier, J., Lee, M., Heylen, D. (2017). Moral Conflicts in VR: Addressing Grade Disputes with a Virtual Trainer. In: Beskow, J., Peters, C., Castellano, G., O'Sullivan, C., Leite, I., Kopp, S. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67400-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67401-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)