Abstract
Colour has been on the minds of philosophers, logicians and linguists for a very long time: its connection with logic; the relation between percepts and concepts; the influence of colour language on colour thought, and the question whether colour is in the world or purely mental. The present contribution starts from the age-old observation that the four logical opposition relations (contradiction, (sub)contrariety, entailment) as embodied in the square of opposition and extensions thereof such as the Blanché hexagon are not particularly choosy about the actual conceptual content of the lexical fields they organize. They generalize over modal operators, propositional operators, predicate calculus operators, tense operators, etc. Why would that be? In the first place, it must mean that the relations are located at a level of generality which has no regard for the concrete conceptual differences between those fields, latching on to some very general substrate. Actually, taking that idea further, I have argued (Jaspers, Logica Universalis 6: 227–248, 2012) that the level of abstraction away from concrete incarnations in the vertices of the hexagon even needs to break out of the conceptual realm into that of colour percepts, where a homologous patterning among primary and secondary colour percepts obtains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This pairing of quantifiers to bitstrings is slightly different from Smessaert’s, but that does not affect the system.
- 2.
In this final section, I and E once again refer to the Chomskyan internal-external distinction, not to corners of the Square.
References
Béziau, J.-Y. (2003). New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Logical Investigations, 10, 218–232.
Blanché, R. (1952). Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind, 61, 369–375.
Blanché, R. (1953). Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria, 19, 89–130.
Blanché, R. (1966). Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: J. Vrin.
Blanché, R. (1969). Structures intellectuelles. essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: Vrin.
Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1981). Children’s comprehension of or: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 46–70.
Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Carmichael’s handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Westport: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. Wakefield/Rhode Island: Moyer Bell.
Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (1999). The inclusion of disjunction in child grammar: Evidence from modal verbs. Proceedings of NELS, 30, 247–257.
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English, PhD dissertation, UCLA; distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.
Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. R. (1990). Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean explanation is Gricean. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 454–471.
Horn, L. R. (2012). Histoire d’*O: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In J.-Y. Béziau & G. Payette (Eds.), The square of opposition: A general framework for cognition (pp. 393–426). Bern: Lang.
Jacoby, P. (1950). A triangle of opposition in Aristotelian logic. The New Scholasticism, 24, 32–56.
Jacoby, P. (1960). Contrariety and the triangle of opposites in valid inferences. The New Scholasticism, 34, 141–169.
Jaspers, D. (2005). Operators in the Lexicon – On the negative logic of natural language. LOT dissertation series 117, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics/LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Jaspers, D. (2009). The language of science and the science of language. On natural words and nonnatural terminology. In D. Jaspers & P. H. Vermoortel (Eds.), Bedrijf & taal, opstellen voor Wilfried Janssens/Business & language, essays in honour of Wilfried Janssens (pp. 543–570). Leuven: Peeters.
Jaspers, D. (2011). Logic of colours in historical perspective, ms.
Jaspers, D. (2012). Logic and colour. Logica Universalis, 6, 227–248.
Larson, R., & Jaspers, D. (2011, March). Broad and narrow language faculties.
Moretti, Alessio. 2009. The geometry of logical opposition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Neuchâtel.
Romano, C. (2010). De la couleur. Un cours. Chatou: Les éditeurs de la transparance.
Russell, B. (1969). An inquiry into meaning and truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sesmat, A. (1951). Logique II: Les raisonnements, la logistique. Paris: Hermann.
Seuren, P. A. M., & Jaspers, D. (2014). Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language, 90(3), 607–643.
Smessaert, H. (2009). On the 3d visualisation of logical relations. Logica Universalis, 3, 303–332.
Van Der Auwera, J. (1996). Modality: The three-layered square. Journal of Semantics, 13, 181–196.
Van Der Auwera, J. (2001). On the typology of negative modals. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sanchez-Valencia, & T. Van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Vendler, Z. (1995). Goethe, Wittgenstein, and the essence of color. The Monist, 78, 391–410.
Von Wright, G. (1951). An essay in modal logic. North-Holland/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaspers, D. (2017). Logic and Colour in Cognition, Logic and Philosophy. In: Silva, M. (eds) How Colours Matter to Philosophy. Synthese Library, vol 388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67398-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67398-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67397-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67398-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)