Skip to main content

Logic and Colour in Cognition, Logic and Philosophy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Colours Matter to Philosophy

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 388))

Abstract

Colour has been on the minds of philosophers, logicians and linguists for a very long time: its connection with logic; the relation between percepts and concepts; the influence of colour language on colour thought, and the question whether colour is in the world or purely mental. The present contribution starts from the age-old observation that the four logical opposition relations (contradiction, (sub)contrariety, entailment) as embodied in the square of opposition and extensions thereof such as the Blanché hexagon are not particularly choosy about the actual conceptual content of the lexical fields they organize. They generalize over modal operators, propositional operators, predicate calculus operators, tense operators, etc. Why would that be? In the first place, it must mean that the relations are located at a level of generality which has no regard for the concrete conceptual differences between those fields, latching on to some very general substrate. Actually, taking that idea further, I have argued (Jaspers, Logica Universalis 6: 227–248, 2012) that the level of abstraction away from concrete incarnations in the vertices of the hexagon even needs to break out of the conceptual realm into that of colour percepts, where a homologous patterning among primary and secondary colour percepts obtains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This pairing of quantifiers to bitstrings is slightly different from Smessaert’s, but that does not affect the system.

  2. 2.

    In this final section, I and E once again refer to the Chomskyan internal-external distinction, not to corners of the Square.

References

  • Béziau, J.-Y. (2003). New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Logical Investigations, 10, 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanché, R. (1952). Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind, 61, 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanché, R. (1953). Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria, 19, 89–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanché, R. (1966). Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanché, R. (1969). Structures intellectuelles. essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1981). Children’s comprehension of or: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Carmichael’s handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. Wakefield/Rhode Island: Moyer Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (1999). The inclusion of disjunction in child grammar: Evidence from modal verbs. Proceedings of NELS, 30, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English, PhD dissertation, UCLA; distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (1990). Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean explanation is Gricean. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 454–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (2012). Histoire d’*O: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In J.-Y. Béziau & G. Payette (Eds.), The square of opposition: A general framework for cognition (pp. 393–426). Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, P. (1950). A triangle of opposition in Aristotelian logic. The New Scholasticism, 24, 32–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, P. (1960). Contrariety and the triangle of opposites in valid inferences. The New Scholasticism, 34, 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, D. (2005). Operators in the Lexicon – On the negative logic of natural language. LOT dissertation series 117, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics/LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, D. (2009). The language of science and the science of language. On natural words and nonnatural terminology. In D. Jaspers & P. H. Vermoortel (Eds.), Bedrijf & taal, opstellen voor Wilfried Janssens/Business & language, essays in honour of Wilfried Janssens (pp. 543–570). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, D. (2011). Logic of colours in historical perspective, ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, D. (2012). Logic and colour. Logica Universalis, 6, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Jaspers, D. (2011, March). Broad and narrow language faculties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, Alessio. 2009. The geometry of logical opposition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, C. (2010). De la couleur. Un cours. Chatou: Les éditeurs de la transparance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1969). An inquiry into meaning and truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesmat, A. (1951). Logique II: Les raisonnements, la logistique. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, P. A. M., & Jaspers, D. (2014). Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language, 90(3), 607–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smessaert, H. (2009). On the 3d visualisation of logical relations. Logica Universalis, 3, 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Auwera, J. (1996). Modality: The three-layered square. Journal of Semantics, 13, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Auwera, J. (2001). On the typology of negative modals. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sanchez-Valencia, & T. Van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. (1995). Goethe, Wittgenstein, and the essence of color. The Monist, 78, 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. (1951). An essay in modal logic. North-Holland/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dany Jaspers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jaspers, D. (2017). Logic and Colour in Cognition, Logic and Philosophy. In: Silva, M. (eds) How Colours Matter to Philosophy. Synthese Library, vol 388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67398-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics