Skip to main content

Yet Another ADNI Machine Learning Paper? Paving the Way Towards Fully-Reproducible Research on Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (MLMI 2017)

Abstract

In recent years, the number of papers on Alzheimer’s disease classification has increased dramatically, generating interesting methodological ideas on the use machine learning and feature extraction methods. However, practical impact is much more limited and, eventually, one could not tell which of these approaches are the most efficient. While over 90% of these works make use of ADNI an objective comparison between approaches is impossible due to variations in the subjects included, image pre-processing, performance metrics and cross-validation procedures. In this paper, we propose a framework for reproducible classification experiments using multimodal MRI and PET data from ADNI. The core components are: (1) code to automatically convert the full ADNI database into BIDS format; (2) a modular architecture based on Nipype in order to easily plug-in different classification and feature extraction tools; (3) feature extraction pipelines for MRI and PET data; (4) baseline classification approaches for unimodal and multimodal features. This provides a flexible framework for benchmarking different feature extraction and classification tools in a reproducible manner. Data management tools for obtaining the lists of subjects in AD, MCI converter, MCI non-converters, CN classes are also provided. We demonstrate its use on all (1519) baseline T1 MR images and all (1102) baseline FDG PET images from ADNI 1, GO and 2 with SPM-based feature extraction pipelines and three different classification techniques (linear SVM, anatomically regularized SVM and multiple kernel learning SVM). The highest accuracies achieved were: 91% for AD vs CN, 83% for MCIc vs CN, 75% for MCIc vs MCInc, 94% for AD-A\(\displaystyle \beta \)+ vs CN-A\(\displaystyle \beta \)- and 72% for MCIc-A\(\displaystyle \beta \)+ vs MCInc-A\(\displaystyle \beta \)+. The code will be made publicly available at the time of the conference (https://gitlab.icm-institute.org/aramislab/AD-ML).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://scikit-learn.org.

References

  1. Jie, B., et al.: Manifold regularized multitask feature learning for multimodality disease classification. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36(2), 489–507 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, D., et al.: Multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage 55(3), 856–867 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bron, E., et al.: Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: the CADDementia challenge. NeuroImage 111, 562–579 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falahati, F., et al.: Multivariate data analysis and machine learning in Alzheimer’s disease with a focus on structural magnetic resonance imaging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. JAD 41(3), 685–708 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, G., et al.: Crowdsourced estimation of cognitive decline and resilience in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Demen. 12(6), 645–653 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yun, H.J., et al.: Multimodal discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease based on regional cortical atrophy and hypometabolism. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0129250 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Young, J., et al.: Accurate multimodal probabilistic prediction of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage Clin. 2, 735–745 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorgolewski, K., et al.: The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Sci. Data 3, 160044 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, K., et al.: Random forest-based similarity measures for multi-modal classification of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 65, 167–175 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, M., et al.: Ensemble sparse classification of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 60(2), 1106–1116 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabuncu, M., et al.: Clinical prediction from structural brain MRI scans: a large-scale empirical study. Neuroinformatics 13(1), 31–46 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuingnet, R., et al.: Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. NeuroImage 56(2), 766–781 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuingnet, R., et al.: Spatial and anatomical regularization of SVM: a general framework for neuroimaging data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35(3), 682–696 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haller, S., et al.: Principles of classification analyses in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease: JAD 26(Suppl. 3), 389–394 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kloppel, S., et al.: Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain J. Neurol. 131(3), 681–689 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rathore, S., et al.: A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer’s disease and its prodromal stages. NeuroImage 155, 530–548 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Teipel, S., et al.: The relative importance of imaging markers for the prediction of Alzheimer’s disease dementia in mild cognitive impairment - Beyond classical regression. NeuroImage Clin. 8, 583–593 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong, T., et al.: Multiple instance learning for classification of dementia in brain MRI. Med. Image Anal. 18(5), 808–818 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan, Y., et al.: Spatial patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, identified via high-dimensional pattern classification, predict subsequent cognitive decline. NeuroImage 39(4), 1731–1743 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Colliot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Samper-González, J. et al. (2017). Yet Another ADNI Machine Learning Paper? Paving the Way Towards Fully-Reproducible Research on Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Wang, Q., Shi, Y., Suk, HI., Suzuki, K. (eds) Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. MLMI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67389-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67389-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67388-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67389-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics