Skip to main content

Project Data Sphere and the Applications of Historical Patient Level Clinical Trial Data in Oncology Drug Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pharmaceutical Statistics (MBSW 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 218))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As scientific data sharing initiatives become more popular, an increasing amount of oncology clinical trial data is becoming available to the public. This historical data has the potential to help improve the design and analysis of future studies of new oncology compounds. Project Data Sphere is one such public database of oncology studies, with patient level data from over 76,000 patients. Here, we review the contents of this database and describe several examples of how the data has been used or could potentially be used in drug development. Applications include population selection, historical comparisons, and identification of stratification factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trialtrove. Informa PLC, London. https://pharmaintelligence.informa.com/products-and-services/data-and-analysis/trialtrove (2017). Last accessed 14 Aug 2017

  2. Green, A.K., Reeder-Hayes, K.E., Corty, R.W., Basch, E., Milowsky, M.I., Dusetzina, S.B., Bennett, A.V., Wood, W.A.: The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data. Oncologist 20, 464-e20 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strom, B.L., Buyse, M., Hughes, J., Knoppers, B.M.: Data sharing, year 1—access to data from industry-sponsored clinical trials. New. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2052–2054 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The YODA project summary of data inquiries and requests. Yale University, New Haven. http://yoda.yale.edu/summary-data-inquiries-and-requests (2017). Last accessed 14 Aug 2017

  5. Pfizer Trial Data & Results. Pfizer Inc, New York. http://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results (2017). Last accessed 14 Aug 2017

  6. Geifman, N., Bollyky, J., Bhattacharya, S., Butte, A.J.: Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough? BMC Med. 13, 280 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. NCI Genomic Data Commons. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. https://gdc.cancer.gov/ (2017). Last accessed 8 Oct 2017

  8. NCI Genomic Data Commons. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. https://gdc.cancer.gov/ (2017). Last accessed 8 Oct 2017

  9. MMRF Researcher Gateway. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk. https://research.themmrf.org/ (2017). Last accessed 8 Oct 2017

  10. Project Data Sphere. Project Data Sphere, LLC. https://www.projectdatasphere.org/ (2017). Last accessed 14 Aug 2017

  11. Wendling, T., Mistry, H., Ogungbenro, K., Aarons, L.: Predicting survival of pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine using longitudinal tumour size data. Canc. Chemo. and Pharmacol. 77, 927–938 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gill, B., Khoja, L., Hamilton, R.J., Abdallah, K., Pintilie, M., Joshua, A.M.: Project data sphere (PDS) in prostate cancer: a first look including concomitant medication use. Bone 1144, 19–78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geifman, N., Butte, A.J.: A patient-level data meta-analysis of standard-of-care treatments from eight prostate cancer clinical trials. Sci. Data 3, 160027 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdallah, K., Hugh-Jones, C., Norman, T., Friend, S., Stolovitzky, G.: The Prostate Cancer DREAM Challenge: a community-wide effort to use open clinical trial data for the quantitative prediction of outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer. Oncologist 20, 459–460 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Green, A.K., Corty, R.W., Wood, W.A., Meeneghan, M., Reeder-Hayes, K.E., Basch, E., Milowsky, M.I., Dusetzina, S.B.: Comparative effectiveness of mitoxantrone plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure. Oncologist 20, 516–522 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Romero, K., Ito, K., Rogers, J.A., Polhamus, D., Qiu, R., Stephenson, D., Mohs, R., Lalonde, R., Sinha, V., Wang, Y., Brown, D.: The future is now: Model-based clinical trial design for Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 97, 210–214 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fijal, B.A., Hall, J.M., Witte, J.S.: Clinical trials in the genomic era: effects of protective genotypes on sample size and duration of trial. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 21, 7–20 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson, F: Using External Patient Data in Clinical Trial Simulation. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, session 530, McCormick Place, Chicago 30 July–4 August (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pocock, S.J.: The combination of randomized and historical controls in clinical trials. J. Chronic Dis. 29, 175–188 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Signorovitch, J.E., Wu, E.Q., Andrew, P.Y., Gerrits, C.M., Kantor, E., Bao, Y., Gupta, S.R., Mulani, P.M.: Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials. Pharmacoeconomics 28, 935–945 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caro, J.J., Ishak, K.J.: No head-to-head trial? Simulate the missing arms. Pharmacoeconomics 28, 957–967 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimopoulos, M.A., Orlowski, R.Z., Facon, T., Sonneveld, P., Anderson, K.C., Beksac, M., Benboubker, L., Roddie, H., Potamianou, A., Couturier, C. and Feng, H.: Retrospective matched-pairs analysis of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma. Haematologica, 112037 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Selaru, P., Tang, Y., Huang, B., Polli, A., Wilner, K.D., Donnelly, E., Cohen, D.P.: Sufficiency of single-arm studies to support registration of targeted agents in molecularly selected patients with cancer: lessons from the clinical development of Crizotinib. Clin. Trans. Sci. 9, 63–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin, D.B.: Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29, 159–183 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawamura, K., Ichikado, K., Suga, M., Yoshioka, M.: Efficacy of azithromycin for treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia: a prospective, open-label study with historical controls. Respiration 87, 478–484 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gökbuget, N., Kelsh, M., Chia, V., Advani, A., Bassan, R., Dombret, H., Doubek, M., Fielding, A.K., Giebel, S., Haddad, V., Hoelzer, D.: Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 6, 473 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robins, J.M., Rotnitzky, A., Zhao, L.P.: Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 846–866 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Zelen, M.: The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials. J. Chronic Dis. 27, 365–375 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yusuf, S., Wittes, J., Probstfield, J., Tyroler, H.A.: Analysis and interpretation of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA 266, 93–98 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg Hather .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hather, G., Liu, R. (2019). Project Data Sphere and the Applications of Historical Patient Level Clinical Trial Data in Oncology Drug Development. In: Liu, R., Tsong, Y. (eds) Pharmaceutical Statistics. MBSW 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67386-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics