Skip to main content

Towards a Semi-automated Tool for Interoperability Assessment: An Ontology-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2017)

Abstract

Interoperability is an essential requirement to be verified when enterprises are starting and maintaining a collaborative relationship. To ensure that such a requirement is continuously met, interoperability needs to be assessed. Various assessment approaches have been proposed in the literature to identify strengths and weakness of an enterprise in terms of their ability to interoperate. However, the main existing approaches are addressing specific aspects of interoperability and focusing on one type of measurement. To assess different aspects of interoperability of the same company, one may use multiple approaches which might cause redundancy and confusion considering the different metrics. Therefore, the objective of this paper, is to propose an assessment approach based on the so called Ontology of Enterprise Interoperability. The proposed approach is supported by a semi-automated tool aiming at reducing the time and paperwork required for evaluation. An example of a networked enterprise is used to validate the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guédria, W., Naudet, Y., Chen, D.: Maturity model for enterprise interoperability. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 1–18 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE standard computer dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vernadat, F.B.: Interoperable enterprise systems: principles, concepts, and methods. Annu. Rev. Control 31, 137–145 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Guédria, W., Chen, D.: Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability. Comput. Ind. 61(2), 176–185 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Panetto, H.: Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 20(8), 727–740 (2007). Taylor & Francis: STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ford. T.C.: Interoperability measurement, Ph.D. thesis, Department of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cestari, José Marcelo A.P., Loures, Eduardo R., Santos, E.A.P.: Interoperability assessment approaches for enterprise and public administration. In: Demey, Y.T., Panetto, H. (eds.) OTM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 78–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Leal, G., Guédria, W., Panetto, H., Lezoche, M.: Towards a comparative analysis of interoperability assessment approaches for collaborative enterprise systems. In 23rd International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, pp. 45–54. IOS Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cornu, C., Chapurlat, V., Quiot, J.M., Irigoin, F.: Customizable interoperability assessment methodology to support technical processes deployment in large companies. Annu. Rev. Control 36(2), 300–308 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, D., Dassisti, M., Elvesaeter, B., Panetto, H., Daclin, N., Jaekel, F.W., Knothe, T., Solberg, A., Anaya, V., Gisbert, R.S., Kalampoukas, K., Pantelopoulos, S., Kalaboukas, K., Bertoni, M., Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U., Pulli, M., Perjons, E., Assogna. P.: Deliverable DI.2: Enterprise Interoperability-Framework and knowledge corpus-Advanced report. INTEROP Network of Excellence (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission. Annexe on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions Towards interoperability for European public services (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alalwan, J., Thomas, M.: An ontology-based approach to assessing records management systems. e-Service J. 8(3), 24–41 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krivograd, N., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Development of an intelligent maturity model-tool for business process management. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference of Systems Science, pp. 3878–3887. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jardim-Goncalves, R., Agostinho, C., Steiger-Garcao, A.: A reference model for sustainable interoperability in networked enterprises: towards the foundation of EI science base. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25(10), 855–873 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Department of Defense. C4ISR Architecture Working Group Final Report - Levels of Information System Interoperability (LISI). Washington, DC (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tolk, A., Muguira, J.A.: The levels of conceptual interoperability model. In: Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, T., Jones, R.: Organizational interoperability maturity model for c2. In: Proceedings of the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Washington (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yahia, E., Aubry, A., Panetto, H.: Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Comput. Ind. 63(5), 443–457 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI for development: guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Pearson Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forrester, E., Buteau, B., Shrum, S.: CMMI for services: guidelines for superior service. Pearson Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gallagher, B., Phillips, M., Richter, K., Shrum, S.: CMMI for acquisition: guidelines for improving the acquisition of products and services. Addison-Wesley Professional (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. SCAMPI Upgrade Team, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO/IEC 33020:2015: Information technology – Process assessment – Process measurement framework for assessment of process capability (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology – Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu, Y., Panetto, H., Ni, Y., Gu, X.: Ontology alignment for networked enterprise information system interoperability in supply chain environment. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 26(1–2), 140–151 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohammad, M.A., Kaloskampis, I., Hicks, Y., Setchi, R.: Ontology-based framework for risk assessment in road scenes using videos. Procedia Comput. Sci. 60, 1532–1541 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer, C., Urwin, E.N., Niknejad, A., Petrovic, D., Popplewell, K., Young, R.I.: An ontology supported risk assessment approach for the intelligent configuration of supply networks. J. Intell. Manuf., 1–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Araujo Wickboldt, J., Armando Bianchin, L., Castagna Lunardi, R., Girardi Andreis, F., da Costa Cordeiro, W.L., Bonato Both, C., Zambenedetti Granville, L., Paschoal Gaspary, L., Trastour, D., Bartolini, C.: Improving IT change management processes with automated risk assessment. In: Bartolini, C., Gaspary, L.P. (eds.) DSOM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5841, pp. 71–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04989-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M.: Virtualising process assessments to facilitate continual service improvement in IT service management. In: The Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Horridge, M., Knublauch, H., Rector, A., Stevens, R., Wroe, C.: A practical guide to building OWL ontologies using the protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE tools edition 1.0 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Protégé Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System (2010), http://protege.stanford.edu/

  33. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been conducted in the context of the PLATINE project (PLAnning Transformation Interoperability in Networked Enterprises), financed by the national fund of research of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (FNR), under the grant C14/IS/8329172/R2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel S. S. Leal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leal, G.S.S., Guédria, W., Panetto, H., Proper, E. (2017). Towards a Semi-automated Tool for Interoperability Assessment: An Ontology-Based Approach. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O'Connor, R., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 770. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67382-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67383-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics