Abstract
This paper examines the role of matter in the explanation of natural phenomena in Cartesian natural philosophy, as well as the extent to which Descartes conceived these phenomena to be necessary or contingent. While it recognizes that Cartesian natural philosophy has strong necessitarian implications, it challenges this idea in relation to the behavior of the most complex entities of the physical universe: God’s organic machines. The argument is not that observed animal behavior is incompatible with a strictly deterministic view of physical processes in the universe, rather it is that Descartes’ frequent allusions to hydraulic or clockwork-type devices presented his readers with models that made it difficult to imagine how animals could react meaningfully to the contingencies – that is to say: to previously unrehearsed situations – in their environment, and that therefore we have to be cautious when interpreting Descartes’ usage of those metaphors. I will argue that the key concept to which Descartes’ readers should pay attention when thinking about these matters is “spontaneity,” and that a careful analysis of the term in Descartes’ writings reveals that there is a sense in which Cartesian natural automata may give meaningful and spontaneous responses to external and internal stimuli. Spontaneity in the Cartesian world, as I will show, is a novel way of thinking about the workings of auto-generating and self-sustaining material systems that have to operate within ever-changing sets of mechanical constraints. The conclusion is that life phenomena – including such high-order functions as perceptual cognition – may be reduced to utterly “blind” mechanisms more successfully within the framework proposed by Cartesians, than it is generally recognized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Primary
Bacon, Francis. 1857–1859. The Works, 7 vols., ed. James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis and Douglas Denon Heath, London: Longman.
———. 1996. Philosophical Studies c.1611–c.1619, ed. by Graham Rees. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 2004. The Instauratio Magna Part II: Novum Organum and Associated Texts, ed. by Graham Rees and Maria Wakely. Oxford: Clarendon.
Boyle, Robert. 1999–2000. The Works, 14 vols., ed. Michael Hunter and Edward B. Davies. London: Pickering and Chatto.
———. 2001. The Correspondence, 6 vols., ed. by Michael Hunter, Antonio Clericuzio and Lawrence M. Principe. London: Pickering and Chatto.
Descartes, René. 1983. Principles of Philosophy, Trans. V.R. Miller and R.P. Miller. Dordrecht and London: Reidel.
———. 1984–1991. Philosophical Writings, 3 vols., ed. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothof and Duglas Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Galileo 1989. Two New Sciences: including the Centers of Gravity and Force of Percussion. Trans. Stillman Drake. Toronto: Wall and Thompson.
Hooke, Robert. 1661. An Attempt for the Explication of the Phaenomena Observable in the Experiment Published by the Honourable Robert Boyle. London: Samuel Thomson.
———. 1665. Micrographia. London: John Martyn and James Allestry.
———. 1705. The Posthumous Works, ed. Richard Waller. London: Samuel Smith and Benjamin Walford.
Hunter, Michael. 2007. Robert Boyle and the Early Royal Society: A Reciprocal Exchange in the Making of Baconian Science. British Journal for the History of Science 40: 1–23.
———. 2009. Boyle: between God and Science. New Haven and London. Yale University Press.
Hunter, Michael, and Paul Wood. 1986. Towards Solomon’s House: Rival Strategies for Reforming the Early Royal Society. History of Science 24: 49–108.
Huygens, Christiaan. 1669. A Summary Account of the Laws of Motion Communicated by Mr. Christian Hugens in a Letter to the R. Society. Philosophical Transactions 4: 925–928.
Koyré, Alexandre. 1968. Newtonian Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Oldenburg, Henry. 1962–1986. Correspondence, 13 vols., ed. by Alfred Rupert Hall and Marie Boas Hall. Madison and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Power, Henry. 1664. Experimental Philosophy. London: John Martyn and James Allestry.
Severinus, Petrus. 1571. Idea Medicinae Philosophicae. Basle: Officina HenricPetri.
Wallis, John. 1668. A Summary Account given by Dr. Wallis of the General Laws of Motion. Philosophical Transactions 3: 864–866.
Secondary
Agassi, Joseph. 1977. Who discovered Boyle’s Law? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8: 189–250.
Bennett, Jim. 1986. The Mechanics’ Philosophy and the Mechanical Philosophy. History of Science 24: 1–28.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with Objects: the Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Birch, Thomas. 1756–1757. The History of the Royal Society of London. Vol. 4 vols. London: A. Millar.
Boas Hall, Marie. 1975. Science in the Early Royal Society. In The Emergence of Science in Western Europe, ed. Maurice Crosland, 57–77. London: Macmillan.
———. 1981. Solomon’s House Emergent: The Early Royal Society and Cooperative Research. In The Analytic Spirit: Essays in the History of Science in honor of Henry Guerlac, ed. Harry Woolf, 177–194. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
———. 1986. L’élasticité de l’air avant Mariotte et en Angleterre. In Mariotte savant et philosophe, ed. Pierre Costabel, 55–63. Paris: Vrin.
———. 1991. Promoting Experimental Learning: Experiment and the Royal Society 1660–1727. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clericuzio, Antonio. 1998. The Mechanical Philosophy and the Spring of Air: New Light on Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke. Nuncius 13: 69–75.
Cohen, I.Bernard. 1964. Newton, Hooke and Boyle’s law (discovered by Power and Towneley). Nature 204: 618–621.
Daston, Lorraine. 1994. Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity. In Rethinking Objectivity, ed. Allan Megill, 37–63. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Dear, Peter. 1985. Nullius in Verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society. Isis 76: 145–161.
———. 1992. From Truth to Disinterestedness in the Seventeenth Century. Social Studies of Science 22: 619–631.
Ehrlich, Mark Edward. 1995. Mechanism and Activity in the Scientific Revolution: the Case of Robert Hooke. Annals of Science 52: 127–151.
Gal, Ofer. 2002. Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the Compounding of the Celestial Motions of the Planets. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 2013. Remarks on the Pre-history of the Mechanical Philosophy. In The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Sophie Roux, 3–26. Dordrecht/Hildesheim/New York/London: Springer.
Gaukroger, Stephen. 2001. Francis Bacon and the Transformation of Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2002. Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giglioni, Guido. 2011. Francesco Bacone. Rome: Carocci.
———. 2013. Francis Bacon. In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Peter Anstey, 41–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gouk, Penelope. 1999. Music, Science and Natural Magic in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Gunther, Robert T. 1968. Early Science in Oxford vol. VIII The Cutler Lectures of Robert Hooke. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall.
Henry, John. 1986. Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory. History of Science 24: 335–381.
Hesse, Mary. 1968. Francis Bacon’s Philosophy of Science. In Essential Articles for the Study of Francis Bacon, ed. Brian Vickers, 114–139. London: Sidwick and Jackson.
Licoppe, Christian. 1994. The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660–1690): The Experimental Evidence as a Transaction between Philosophical Knowledge and Aristocratic Power. Science in Context 7: 205–244.
Milton, John R. 1998. Laws of Nature. In The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayer, vol. 1, 680–701. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
More, Henry. 1995. Manual of Metaphysics, part.1, Trans. A. Jacob. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
Moyer, Albert. 1977. Robert Hooke’s Ambiguous Presentation of Hooke’s Law. Isis 68: 266–175.
Osler, Margaret. 1994. Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmieri, Paolo. 2005. Spuntar lo scoglio più duro: did Galileo ever think the Most Beautiful Thought Experiment in the History of Science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 223–240.
———. 2008. Reenacting Galileo’s Experiments: Rediscovering the Techniques of Seventeenth-Century Science. Lewiston: Mellen Press.
Pastorino, Cesare. 2011. Weighing Experience: Experimental Histories and Francis Bacon’s Quantitative Program. Early Science and Medicine 16: 542–570.
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio. 1988. Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rees, Graham. 1980. Atomism and Subtelty in Francis Bacon’s Philosophy. Annals of Science 37: 549–571.
———. 1985. Quantitative Reasoning in Francis Bacon’s Natural Philosophy. Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1: 27–48.
Rossi, Paolo. 1977. Francis Bacon, Richard Hooker e le leggi di natura. Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 32: 72–77.
———. 1986. I ragni e le formiche: un’apologia della storia della scienza. Bononia: Il Mulino.
Roux, Sophie. 2001. Les lois de la nature à l’âge classique: la question terminologique. Revue de Synthèse 122: 531–576.
Schaffer, Simon. 1987. Godly Men and Mechanical Philosophers: Souls and Spirits in Restoration Natural Philosophy. Science in Context 1: 55–85.
Shackelford, Jole. 1998. Seeds with a Mechanical Purpose: Severinus’ Semina and Seventeenth-Century Matter Theory. In Reading the Book of Nature: the Other Side of the Scientific Revolution, ed. Allen G. Debus and Michael T. Walton, 15–44. Ann Arbor, MI: Sixteenth Century Journal Publisher.
Shapin, Steven. 1988. Robert Boyle and Mathematics: Reality, Representation, and Experimental Practice. Science in Context 2: 23–58.
———. 1991. A Scholar and a Gentleman: The Problematic Identity of the Scientific Practitioner in Early Modern England. History of Science 29: 279–327.
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Steinle, Friedrich. 1995. The Amalgamation of a Concept: Laws of Nature in the New Sciences. In Laws of Nature: Essays on Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimension, ed. Friedel Weinert, 316–368. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
———. 2008. From Principles to Regularities: Tracing ‘Laws of Nature’ in Early Modern France and England. In Natural Laws and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, ed. Lorraine Daston and Michael Stolleis, 215–231. Farham and Burlington: Ashgate.
Webster, Charles. 1965. The Discovery of the Boyle’s Law, and the Concept of the Elasticity of the Air in Seventeenth Century. Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 2: 441–502.
———. 1966. Richard Towneley, the Towneley Group and Seventeenth-Century Science. Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 118: 51–76.
———. 1967. Henry Power’s Experimental Philosophy. Ambix 14: 150–178.
Westfall, Richard. 1971. Force in Newton’s Physics: the Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Mcmillan.
Williams, E. 1956. Hooke’s Law and the Concept of Elastic Limit. Annals of Science 12: 74–83.
Wren, Christopher. 1668. Lex Naturae de Collisione Corporum. Philosophical Transactions 3: 867–868.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sacco, F.G. (2019). Bacon and the Virtuosi: Experimental Contingency and Mechanical Laws in the Early Royal Society. In: Omodeo, P.D., Garau, R. (eds) Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 332. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67378-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67378-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67376-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67378-3
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)