Reshaping Energy Governance in the Arctic? Assessing the Implications of LNG for European Shipping Companies

  • Ryan Holmes
  • Darren McCauley
  • Nick Hanley
Part of the Springer Polar Sciences book series (SPPS)


Future estimates indicate that the reduction of the Arctic ice cap will open up new areas and increase the viability of the region to be increasingly used for international shipping (Liu and Kronbak, J Trans Geo 18(3):434–444. doi:, 2010). The Arctic sea routes and related coastal area are therefore gaining increasing levels of interest, as they become a more attractive alternative for maritime transport. This demand for new infrastructure and development in areas where there has previously been little or none, presents a unique situation to analyze. The increased interest and demand for new development along Arctic sea routes through an environmentally sensitive region make the Arctic an ideal area of which to study the transition toward liquefied natural gas becoming the prominent marine fuel.

We must develop a better understanding of how and under what conditions such a transition will take place and who will make decisions that will influence any such transition. Exploring past and current aspects of maritime and energy governance is an important step in developing an understanding of how a transition towards liquefied natural gas could re-shape our understanding of Arctic governance.


Arctic Governance Energy LNG Shipping Maritime 


  1. Aliabadi, A., Staebler, R., & Sharma, S. (2015). Air quality monitoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(5), 2651–2673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aporta, C. (2009). The trail as home: Inuit and their pan-arctic network of routes. Human Ecology, 37(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arctic Council. (2009). Arctic marine shipping assessment 2009 report. Retrieved from
  4. Arctic Council. (2016). The Arctic council: A forum for peace and cooperation. Retrieved from
  5. Bennett, M. M. (2014). North by northeast: Toward an Asian-Arctic region. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(1), 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biermann, F. (2010). Beyond the intergovernmental regime: Recent trends in global carbon governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 284–288.
  7. Bloor, M., Sampson, H., Baker, S., & Dahlgren, K. (2014). The instrumental use of technical doubts: Technological controversies, investment decisions and air pollution controls in the global shipping industry. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 234–244.
  8. Bukharin, O. (2006). Russia’s nuclear icebreaker fleet. Science and Global Security, 14(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, K., He, S., Chou, C., Kao, S., & Chiou, A. (2015). Route planning and cost analysis for travelling through the arctic northeast passage using public 3D GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(8), 1375–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., & Lauer, A. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(24), 8512–8518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driessen, P. P., Dieperink, C., Laerhoven, F., Runhaar, H. A., & Vermeulen, W. J. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance–experiences from the netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(3), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eimskip. (2015). Eimskip. Retrieved from
  13. Farazmand, A. (2013). Governance in the age of globalization: Challenges and opportunities for south and southeast asia. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fednav. (2015). Fednav. Retrieved from
  15. Florini, A., & Sovacool, B. K. (2009). Who governs energy? The challenges facing global energy governance. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5239–5248.
  16. Griffiths, D. (1995). British shipping and the diesel engine: The early years. The Mariner’s Mirror, 81(3), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harsem, Ø., Eide, A., & Heen, K. (2011). Factors influencing future oil and gas prospects in the arctic. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8037–8045.
  18. Hartsig, A., Frederickson, I., Yeung, C., & Senner, S. (2012). Arctic bottleneck: Protecting the bering strait region from increased vessel traffic. Ocean & Coastal LJ, 18, 35.Google Scholar
  19. Hirdaris, S. E., Cheng, Y. F., Shallcross, P., Bonafoux, J., Carlson, D., Prince, B., & Sarris, G. A. (2014). Considerations on the potential use of nuclear small modular reactor (SMR) technology for merchant marine propulsion. Ocean Engineering, 79, 101–130.
  20. Ho, J. (2010). The implications of arctic sea ice decline on shipping. Marine Policy, 34(3), 713–715.
  21. Hong, N. (2012). The melting arctic and its impact on China’s maritime transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 35(1), 50–57.
  22. Hugill, P. J. (2014). Petroleum supply, marine transportation technology, and the emerging international order of the post world war one period. In The global politics of science and technology (Vol. 1, pp. 141–159). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Hultman, N. E. (2011). The political economy of nuclear energy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(3), 397–411.
  24. Jabour, J. (2014). Progress towards the mandatory code for polar shipping. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 6(1), 64–67.
  25. Jordan, A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C, Government & Policy, 26(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kao, S., Pearre, N. S., & Firestone, J. (2012). Adoption of the arctic search and rescue agreement: A shift of the arctic regime toward a hard law basis? Marine Policy, 36(3), 832–838.
  27. Kennicutt, M. C., Chown, S. L., Cassano, J. J., Liggett, D., Peck, L. S., Massom, R., et al. (2014). A roadmap for Antarctic and Southern Ocean science for the next two decades and beyond. Antarctic Science, 27(01), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knol, M., & Arbo, P. (2014). Oil spill response in the arctic: Norwegian experiences and future perspectives. Marine Policy, 50, Part A(0), 171–177.
  29. Krivitsky, S. V., Tsvetsinsky, A. S., Mirzoev, D. A., & Krivitsky, A. S. (2001). Oil and gas exploration at the arctic shore: Social issues. Proceedings of the Eleventh (2001) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, I, 661–664.Google Scholar
  30. Liu, M., & Kronbak, J. (2010). The potential economic viability of using the northern sea route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 434–444.
  31. McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Pavlenko, M., Rehner, R., & Holmes, R. (2016). Energy justice in the Arctic: Implications for energy infrastructural development in the Arctic. Energy Research & Social Science.
  32. NEAS. (2015). Neas. Retrieved from
  33. Oka, Y., Uchikawa, S., & Suzuki, K. (2014). Light water reactor design. In Nuclear reactor design (pp. 127–229). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Painter, D. S. (2012). Oil and the American century. Journal of American History, 99(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Royal Arctic Line. (2015). Royal Arctic Line. Retrieved from
  36. Sakhuja, V. (2014). The polar code and arctic navigation. Strategic Analysis, 38(6), 803–811.
  37. Sidortsov, R., & Sovacool, B. (2015). Left out in the cold: Energy justice and Arctic energy research. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(3), 302–307. Scholar
  38. Smits, C. C., van Tatenhove, J. P., & van Leeuwen, J. (2014). Authority in Arctic governance: Changing spheres of authority in Greenlandic offshore oil and gas developments. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(4), 329–348.Google Scholar
  39. Stokke, O. S. (2013). Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sydnes, A. K., & Sydnes, M. (2013). Norwegian–Russian cooperation on oil-spill response in the Barents Sea. Marine Policy, 39(0), 257–264.
  41. Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Venn, F. (2012). The wartime ‘special relationship’? From oil war to Anglo-American Oil Agreement, 1939–1945. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 10(2), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Viana, M., Hammingh, P., Colette, A., Querol, X., Degraeuwe, B., Vlieger, I. d., & van Aardenne, J. (2014). Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal air quality in Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 90, 96–105.
  44. WesternGeco. (2015). Westerngeco. Retrieved from
  45. Young, O. R. (2012). Arctic tipping points: Governance in turbulent times. Ambio, 41(1), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zolotukhin, A., & Gavrilov, V. (2011). Russian arctic petroleum resources. Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles, 66(6), 899–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Sustainable DevelopmentUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations