Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

It is often said that the Standard Model (SM) is a theory of interactions. That means,that it describes the laws of nature by assigning its pieces a susceptibility to certain forces.This is modelled as a charge with respect to a field, which in this respect is nothing more than a quantum of how strongly it couples to the force carriers of that field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a general introduction to the Standard Model, see for instance the review in [1], and references therein.

  2. 2.

    A net charge arises as the hair is stripped of or receives electrons—fundamental particles with electric charge \(-1e\). Unlike a compound object, a fundamental particle has an intrinsic, fixed charge.

  3. 3.

    This could be an indication of a more fundamental theory than the SM.

  4. 4.

    Here it is again, the elusive, seemingly fundamental, concept of mass.

  5. 5.

    Electroweak as in the unification of electromagnetic and weak interactions.

  6. 6.

    The electron being the first fundamental particle discovered, it set the standard for electric charge—as the name suggests.

  7. 7.

    In the unified electroweak force, the charge is instead weak hypercharge, which takes both weak isospin and electric charge into account.

  8. 8.

    We won’t need to discuss parity further in this work, but for a historical experiment, the interested reader is referred to Ref. [4].

  9. 9.

    L denotes left-handed. The right-handed counterparts are flavour singlets, and thus stand alone: \(e_R, \mu _R, \ldots \).

  10. 10.

    Flavour oscillations are a quantum mechanical subtlety, relating to the flavour eigenstate not being the same as the mass eigenstate. Oh, yes, there it is again.

  11. 11.

    \(8 = 3^2 - 1\), QCD being an SU(3) symmetry group.

  12. 12.

    Had the history of discovery been different, the electric charge of the electron had likely been defined as \(-3e\) instead.

  13. 13.

    The relation between energy and velocity is given by \(E^2 = m^2 + \vec {p}^2\).

  14. 14.

    This convention goes back to considering antiparticles as particles moving backwards in time, as introduced in [5].

  15. 15.

    Anti-electron: also known as positron.

  16. 16.

    The concept of hadrons is older than the quark model, so, they must have certain unique characteristics, evident already before.

  17. 17.

    Colourless combinations thereof, such as pentaquarks, have also been observed [6].

  18. 18.

    Virtual particles can “borrow” additional energy from the vacuum, but only for a short time.

  19. 19.

    More strictly speaking: \(m_n > m_p + m_e + m_{\bar{\nu }_e}\).

  20. 20.

    The idea is similar to the method of Taylor expansion.

  21. 21.

    This discussion loosely follows Ref. [10], which gives an overview of the renormalisation idea that is worth a read!

  22. 22.

    For QED the physically meaningful upper cut-off is the scale of unification with the weak interaction.

  23. 23.

    In the natural units commonly used in particle physics, where the speed of light in vacuum \(c = 1\), distance has dimensions of 1/(energy).

  24. 24.

    The electroweak theory is also non-Abelian, and W and Z bosons are self-interacting. Photons are not.

  25. 25.

    Macroscopic—or even outside the proton radius.

  26. 26.

    The colour field lines are not radial (as in electromagnetism) but compressed in a flux tube between the partons.

  27. 27.

    Sign convention; confusing but true.

  28. 28.

    Note that since they don’t interact in the SM, right-handed neutrinos are here not constrained to stay on the brane!

  29. 29.

    The naming conventions and parameter choices vary between models. Here we choose the ADD representation.

References

  1. G. Altarelli, The standard model of particle physics. CERN-PHTH-2005-206 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.A. Olive et al., Particle data group. Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Niering et al., Measurement of the hydrogen 1S–2S transition frequency by phase coherent comparison with a microwave cesium fountain clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(24), 5496–5499 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C.S. Wu et al., Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay. Phys. Rev. 105(4), 1413–1415 (1957)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E.C.G. Stueckelberg, Remarks on the creation of pairs of particles in the theory of relativity. Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 588–594 (1941)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. LHCb Collaboration, Observation of J/\(\psi \)p resonances consistent with pentaquark states in \(\Lambda _b^0 \rightarrow J/\psi {K^-}p\) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.D. Bjorken, Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum. Phys. Rev. 179, 1547–1553 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H.L. Lai et al., New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys. Rev. D 82, 074024 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Durham HepData Project. PDF Plotter (2016), http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/pdf/pdf3.html

  10. B. Delamotte, A hint of renormalization. Am. J. Phys. 72, 170–184 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Andersson et al., Parton fragmentation and string dynamics. Phys. Rep. 97(2–3), 31–145 (1983). ISSN: 0370-1573

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Planck Collaboration, Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Eichten et al., Supercollider physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Eichten et al., Erratum: supercollider physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 1065 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Chiappetta, M. Perrottet, Possible bounds on compositeness from inclusive one jet production in large hadron colliders. Phys. Lett. B 253, 489 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370–3373 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B 429(3–4), 263–272 (1998). ISSN: 0370-2693

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Meade, L. Randall, Black holes and quantum gravity at the LHC. JHEP 05, 003 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new particles in two-jet final states in 7 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 161801 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for quark contact interactions in dijet angular distributions in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = \) 7 TeV measured with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 694, 327 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new physics in dijet mass and angular distributions in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = \) 7 TeV measured with the ATLAS detector. New J. Phys. 13, 053044 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new physics in the dijet mass distribution using 1 fb\(^{-1}\) of pp collision data at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV collected by the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 708, 37–54 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using pp collision data at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D 91, 052007 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. U. Baur, I. Hinchliffe, D. Zeppenfeld, Excited quark production at hadron colliders. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2, 1285 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. U. Baur, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Excited quark and lepton production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D 42, 815–825 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lene Kristian Bryngemark .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bryngemark, L.K. (2017). The Standard Model and Beyond. In: Search for New Phenomena in Dijet Angular Distributions at √s = 8 and 13 TeV. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67346-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics