LDPE/RH/MAPE/MMT Nanocomposite Films for Packaging Applications

  • Khaliq Majeed
  • Reza Arjmandi
  • Azman HassanEmail author


The ever-growing demand for the development of high-performance packaging films and the equally growing need to protect our environment has led to intense research in the manufacture of eco-friendly films with good mechanical and barrier properties. Rice husk (RH)/montmorillonite (MMT) filled and maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene (MAPE) compatibilized LDPE films were prepared by extrusion blown film. MAPE, RH and MMT were used in various loading to study their effect on the mechanical, oxygen barrier and morphological properties. Results revealed that MAPE helped LDPE chains to delaminate MMT platelets and distribute RH/MMT uniformly in the LDPE matrix. In addition, mechanical and barrier properties of nanocomposite films prepared by MAPE as compatibilizer are better than those without compatibilizer. Increasing RH content in RH/MMT filler deteriorated mechanical and barrier properties. Increasing MMT content into RH/MMT filler-filled LDPE nanocomposite films improved the tensile and barrier properties significantly, and the films containing 4 phc MMT, 3wt% RH and 6wt% MAPE are the optimum formulation as evidenced by mechanical properties and oxygen permeability. The unique combination of mechanical properties and oxygen permeability for RH/MMT filler-filled LDPE composite films shows that these nanocomposite films are potential candidate for a variety of packaging applications.


Montmorillonite Rice husk Maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene Low-density polyethylene Nanocomposites Mechanical properties Barrier properties 



The authors wish to acknowledge the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and Fundamental Research Grant Scheme 78354, sub-code: 3F302 and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) for financial support.


  1. Ali Dadfar SM, Alemzadeh I, Reza Dadfar SM, Vosoughi M (2011) Studies on the oxygen barrier and mechanical properties of low density polyethylene/organoclay nanocomposite films in the presence of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer as a new type of compatibilizer. Mater Des 32:1806–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrakhiz FZ, El Achaby M, Malha M, Bensalah MO, Fassi-Fehri O, Bouhfid R, Benmoussa K, Qaiss A (2013) Mechanical and thermal properties of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites: Doum/low density polyethylene. Mater Des 43:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayranci E, Tunc S (2003) A method for the measurement of the oxygen permeability and the development of edible films to reduce the rate of oxidative reactions in fresh foods. Food Chem 80:423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azizi S, Yunus WMZW, Ahmad M (2011) Effect of polyethylene-grafted maleic anhydride on properties of high-density polyethylene and polystyrene blend/layered silicate nanocomposites. J Reinf Plast Compos 30:1649–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagheri-Kazemabad S, Fox D, Chen Y, Geever LM, Khavandi A, Bagheri R, Higginbotham CL, Zhang H, Chen B (2012) Morphology, rheology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/ethylene–octene copolymer/clay nanocomposites: effects of the compatibilizer. Compos Sci Technol 72:1697–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonilla J, Atarés L, Vargas M, Chiralt A (2012) Edible films and coatings to prevent the detrimental effect of oxygen on food quality: possibilities and limitations. J Food Eng 110:208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dadfar SA, Alemzadeh I, Dadfar SR, Vosoughi M (2011) Studies on the oxygen barrier and mechanical properties of low density polyethylene/organoclay nanocomposite films in the presence of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer as a new type of compatibilizer. Mater Des 32:1806–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demir H, Atikler U, Balköse D, Tıhmınlıoğlu F (2006) The effect of fiber surface treatments on the tensile and water sorption properties of polypropylene–luffa fiber composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37:447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan TV (2011) Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J Colloid Interf Sci 363:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esnaashari C, Khorasani SN, Entezam M, Khalili S (2013) Mechanical and water absorption properties of sawdust—low density polyethylene nanocomposite. J Appl Polym Sci 127:1295–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faruk O, Matuana LM (2008) Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood-plastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:2073–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fendler A, Villanueva MP, Gimenez E, Lagarón JM (2007) Characterization of the barrier properties of composites of HDPE and purified cellulose fibers. Cellulose 14:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feng Y, Hu Y, Zhao G, Yin J, Jiang W (2011) Preparation and mechanical properties of high-performance short ramie fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 122:1564–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. George J, Kumar R, Jayaprahash C, Ramakrishna A, Sabapathy SN, Bawa AS (2006) Rice bran-filled biodegradable low-density polyethylene films: development and characterization for packaging applications. J Appl Polym Sci 102:4514–4522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gwon JG, Lee SY, Chun SJ, Doh GH, Kim JH (2010) Effects of chemical treatments of hybrid fillers on the physical and thermal properties of wood plastic composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:1491–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gwon JG, Lee SY, Chun SJ, Doh GH, Kim JH (2012) Physical and mechanical properties of wood–plastic composites hybridized with inorganic fillers. J Compos Mater 46:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habibi Y, El-Zawawy WK, Ibrahim MM, Dufresne A (2008) Processing and characterization of reinforced polyethylene composites made with lignocellulosic fibers from Egyptian agro-industrial residues. Compos Sci Technol 68:1877–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haq M, Burgueño R, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Hybrid bio-based composites from blends of unsaturated polyester and soybean oil reinforced with nanoclay and natural fibers. Compos Sci Technol 68:3344–3351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemmasi AH, Khademi-Eslam H, Talaiepoor M, Kord B, Ghasemi I (2010) Effect of nanoclay on the mechanical and morphological properties of wood polymer nanocomposite. J Reinf Plast Compos 29:964–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemmati M, Shariatpanahi H, Fereidoon A, Aalaie J, Ahangari MG (2011) Study of a polymer blend/nanoclay nanocomposite of polyethylene and polyamide 6 prepared by mechanical blending. Polym Plast Technol Eng 51:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horst MF, Quinzani LM, Failla MD (2014) Rheological and barrier properties of nanocomposites of HDPE and exfoliated montmorillonite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 27:106–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kayaisang S, Saikrasun S, Amornsakchai T (2013) Potential use of recycled PET in comparison with liquid crystalline polyester as a dual functional additive for enhancing heat stability and reinforcement for high density polyethylene composite fibers. J Polym Environ 21:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kengkhetkit N, Amornsakchai T (2012) Utilisation of pineapple leaf waste for plastic reinforcement: 1. A novel extraction method for short pineapple leaf fiber. Ind Crops Prod 40:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khalili S, Masoomi M, Bagheri R (2013) The effect of organo-modified montmorillonite on mechanical and barrier properties of linear low-density polyethylene/low-density polyethylene blend films. J Plast Film Sheeting 29:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kord B (2011) Nanofiller reinforcement effects on the thermal, dynamic mechanical and morphological bahavior of HDPE/rice husk flour composites. BioResources 6:1351–1358Google Scholar
  26. Kord B, Kiakojouri SMH (2011) Effect of nanoclay dispersion on physical and mechanical properties of wood flour/polypropylene/glass fiber hybrid composites. BioResources 6:1741–1751Google Scholar
  27. Kumagai S, Matsuo Y (2013) Composite produced from rice husk and chopped carbon fiber without using any binders. Ind Crops Prod 43:640–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majeed K, Hassan A, Bakar AA (2014) Influence of maleic anhydride-grafted polyethylene compatibiliser on the tensile, oxygen barrier and thermal properties of rice husk and nanoclay-filled low-density polyethylene composite films. J Plast Film Sheeting 30:120–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Majeed K, Hassan A, Abu Bakar A (2015a) Barrier, biodegradation, and mechanical properties of (Rice husk)/(Montmorillonite) hybrid filler‐filled low‐density polyethylene nanocomposite films. J Vinyl Add TechnolGoogle Scholar
  30. Majeed K, Hassan A, Bakar A (2015b) In: Hakeem KR, Jawaid M, Alothman OY (eds) Tensile, oxygen barrier and biodegradation properties of rice husk-reinforced polyethylene blown films. Agricultural biomass based potential materials. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  31. Majeed K, Hassan A, Bakar AA, Jawaid M (2016) Effect of montmorillonite (MMT) content on the mechanical, oxygen barrier, and thermal properties of rice husk/MMT hybrid filler-filled low-density polyethylene nanocomposite blown films. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 29:1003–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martín Z, Jiménez I, Gómez MA, Ade HW, Kilcoyne DA, Hernádez-Cruz D (2009) Spectromicroscopy study of intercalation and exfoliation in polypropylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 113:11160–11165Google Scholar
  33. Merinska D, Kubisova H, Kalendová A, Svoboda P, Hromádková J (2012) Processing and properties of polyethylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mittal V (2013) Polypropylene nanocomposites with thermally stable phosphonium-and pyridinium-modified layered silicates: thermal, mechanical and gas barrier properties. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 26:1082–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Najafi A, Kord B, Abdi A, Ranaee S (2012) The impact of the nature of nanoclay on physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene/reed flour nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25:717–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nandi S, Bose S, Mitra S, Ghosh AK (2012) Effect of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene on engineering properties and morphology of fumed silica filled polyethylene blown films. J Plast Film Sheeting 28:207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silvestre C, Duraccio D, Cimmino S (2011) Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 36:1766–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siracusa V, Blanco I, Romani S, Tylewicz U, Dalla Rosa M (2012) Gas permeability and thermal behavior of polypropylene films used for packaging minimally processed fresh-cut potatoes: a case study. J Food Sci 77:E264–E272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sliwa F, Charrier F, Marin G, Malet F (2012) Mechanical and interfacial properties of wood and bio-based thermoplastic composite. Compos Sci Technol 72:1733–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taha I, Abdin YF (2011) Modeling of strength and stiffness of short randomly oriented glass fiber-polypropylene composites. J Compos Mater 45:1805–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taşdemır M, Biltekin H, Caneba GT (2009) Preparation and characterization of LDPE and PP—wood fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci 112:3095–3102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Youssef AM (2013) Polymer nanocomposites as a new trend for packaging applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng 52:635–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahedi M, Pirayesh H, Khanjanzadeh H, Tabar MM (2013) Organo-modified montmorillonite reinforced walnut shell/polypropylene composites. Mater Des 51:803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhong Y, Janes D, Zheng Y, Hetzer M, De Kee D (2007a) Mechanical and oxygen barrier properties of organoclay‐polyethylene nanocomposite films. Polym Eng Sci 47:1101–1107Google Scholar
  45. Zhong Y, Poloso T, Hetzer M, De Kee D (2007b) Enhancement of wood/polyethylene composites via compatibilization and incorporation of organoclay particles. Polym Eng Sci 47:797–803Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioprocess and Polymer EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaSkudaiMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations