Reflections: Ben Wright, Best Test Design and Knox’s Cube Test

Part of the Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology book series (SSMST)


Writing this chapter past age 80 occasions some reflections upon my life as it intersected with Ben Wright. I presented some of these thoughts at a symposium given in Ben’s honor in Chicago in April of 2003. More comments can be given here to serve a wider audience. In reflecting on past times, I do so with great fondness for Ben, and in appreciation of my long friendship with him lasting more than fifty years. Not only have I had the occasion of his friendship, we shared the collegial opportunity of writing about Rasch measurement. These activities occasioned the opportunity to meet and share a friendship with many others who also acknowledge a fondness for him.


  1. American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendation for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin Supplement, 51(2, Part 2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., Kuipers, J.-R., & Thierry, G. (2009). The Whorfian mind: Electrophysiological evidence that language shapes perception. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(4), 332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, G. (1947). A point scale of performance tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Babcock, H. (1965). The Babcock test of mental deficiency. Beverly Hills, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  5. Bejar, I. (1990). A generative analysis of a three-dimensional spatial task. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bejar, I. (2002). Generative testing: From conception to implementation. In H. Irvine & P. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bormuth, J. (1970). On the theory of achievement test items. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bridgman, P. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Brody, T. (1993). The theory behind physics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Carnap, R. (1966). An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, A., Gardner, B., & Gardner, M. (1941). Deep south. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Falmagne, J.-C., & Narens, L. (1983). Scales and meaningfulness of quantitative laws. Synthese, 55, 287–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guilford, J. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Henry, W. (1956). The analysis of fantasy. New York: Krieger.Google Scholar
  17. Hesse, H. (1969). The glass bead game. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  18. Irvine, H., & Kyllonen, P. (Eds.). (2002). Item generation for test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Isherwood, C. (1939). Goodbye to Berlin. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  20. Linacre, J. (2014). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago: MESA.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, R., Franzen, M., & Raymond, M. (1996). Effects of unilateral vascular lesions and gender on visual spatial and auditory verbal attention. Applied Neuropsychology, 3, 116–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Messick, S. (1992). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pintner, R. (1915). A scale of performance tests. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  24. Rainwater, L., Colman, R., & Handel, G. (1962). Workingman’s wife. New York: MacFadden.Google Scholar
  25. Rasch, G. (1964). An individual-centered approach to item analysis with two categories of answers. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
  26. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1960).Google Scholar
  27. Richardson, J. (2003). Knox’s cube imitation test: A historical review and an experimental analysis. Unpublished manuscript. The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK76AA, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Shewhart, W. (1986). Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. New York: Dover. (Original work published in 1939).Google Scholar
  29. Stenner, A. J., Fisher, W. P., Jr., Stone, M. H., & Burdick, D. S. (2013). Causal Rasch models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(536), 1–14.Google Scholar
  30. Stenner, A. J., & Smith, M. (1982). Testing construct theories. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stenner, A. J., & Stone, M. (2003). Item specification vs. item banking. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 17(3), 929–930.Google Scholar
  32. Stigler, S. (1999). Statistics on the table. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stone, M., & Wright, B. (1980). Knox’s cube test. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, M. (2002a). Knox’s cube test—revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
  35. Stone, M. (2002b). Quality control in testing. Popular Measurement, 4(1), 15–23.Google Scholar
  36. Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Midway Reprint Series.Google Scholar
  38. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. In: J. B. Carroll (Ed.), (Foreword by Stuart Chase). Cambridge, MA, New York, and London: Published jointly by The Technology Press at MIT; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; and Chapman & Hall, Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. William, J. (1956). The compleat strategist. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.) (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA.Google Scholar
  42. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. (2002). Making measures. Chicago: Phaneron.Google Scholar
  43. Youden, W. (1972). Enduring values. Technometrics, 14(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adler School of Professional PsychologyOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations