Skip to main content

Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Abstract

With the irruption of ICTs and the crisis of political representation, many online platforms have been developed with the aim of improving participatory democratic processes. However, regarding platforms for online petitioning, previous research has not found examples of how to effectively introduce discussions, a crucial feature to promote deliberation. In this study we focus on the case of Decidim Barcelona, the online participatory-democracy platform launched by the City Council of Barcelona in which proposals can be discussed with an interface that combines threaded discussions and comment alignment with the proposal. This innovative approach allows to examine whether neutral, positive or negative comments are more likely to generate discussion cascades. The results reveal that, with this interface, comments marked as negatively aligned with the proposal were more likely to engage users in online discussions and, therefore, helped to promote deliberative decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.decidim.barcelona/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.gov.uk/petition-government.

  3. 3.

    https://www.yrpri.org.

  4. 4.

    https://decide.madrid.es/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.irekia.euskadi.eus/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.decidim.barcelona/api/docs.

References

  1. Ackerman, B., Fishkin, J.S.: Deliberation day. J. Polit. Philos. 10(2), 129–152 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., Cantijoch, M., San Martin, J.: Online resources, political participation and equality (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aragón, P., Gómez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A.: To thread or not to thread: the impact of conversation threading on online discussion. In: 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2017. The AAAI Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aragón, P., Gómez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A.: Visualization tool for collective awareness in a platform of citizen proposals. In: 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2016. The AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aragón, P., Gómez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A.: Detecting platform effects in online discussions. Policy Internet (2017, in Press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/poi3.158

  6. Brito Vieira, M., Runciman, D.: Representation. Polity, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castells, M.: Communication Power. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crouch, C.: Post-Democracy. Polity, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Della Porta, D.: Can Democracy be Saved?: Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, vol. 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs, C.: Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. Routledge, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gómez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A., López, V.: Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in Slashdot. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 645–654. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Kaltenbrunner, A., Banchs, R.E.: The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 230–243 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hague, B.N., Loader, B.: Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. Psychology Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hale, S.A., John, P., Margetts, H., Yasseri, T.: Investigating political participation and social information using big data and a natural experiment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.3562 (2014)

  16. Hale, S.A., Margetts, H., Yasseri, T.: Petition growth and success rates on the UK no. 10 downing street website. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference on WebSci 2013, NY, USA, pp. 132–138 (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2464464.2464518

  17. Huang, S.W., Suh, M.M., Hill, B.M., Hsieh, G.: How activists are both born and made: an analysis of users on change.org. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 211–220. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P.: The political click: political participation through e-petitions in Germany. Policy Internet 2(4), 131–165 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keane, J.: The Life and Death of Democracy. Simon and Schuster, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective. JeDEM-eJournal eDemocracy Open Govern. 1(1), 1–11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindner, R., Riehm, U.: Broadening participation through e-petitions? an empirical study of petitions to the german parliament. Policy Internet 3(1), 1–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Margetts, H.Z., John, P., Hale, S.A., Reissfelder, S.: Leadership without leaders? starters and followers in online collective action. Polit. Stud. 63(2), 278–299 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Monterde, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira de Lucena, A.: Disseny del procés de participació digital del programa d’actuació municipal (PAM) i de districtes (PAD) 2016–2019, p. 93. Ajuntament de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Panagiotopoulos, P., Elliman, T.: Online engagement from the grassroots: reflecting on over a decade of epetitioning experience in Europe and the UK. In: Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S. (eds.) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance, pp. 79–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rancière, J., Panagia, D., Bowlby, R.: Ten theses on politics. Theory Event 5(3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosanvallon, P., Goldhammer, A.: Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Toret, J., Calleja, A., Marín Miró, Ó., Aragón, P., Aguilera, M., Lumbreras, A.: Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. el sistema red 15m, un nuevo paradigma de la política distribuida. IN3 Working Paper Series (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tormey, S.: The End of Representative Politics. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whyte, A., Renton, A., Macintosh, A.: e-petitioning in Kingston and Bristol. International Teledemocracy Centre, Napier University, Edinburgh, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yasseri, T., Hale, S.A., Margetts, H.: Modeling the rise in internet-based petitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0239 (2013)

  31. Žižek, S.: The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Verso, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the María de Maeztu Units of Excellence Programme (MDM-2015-0502).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Aragón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 5.
figure 5

Discussion page of a proposal in Decidim Barcelona for building a municipal ice skating rink. The hybrid interface combines both conversation threading and coloring, i.e., positive and negative first level comments include green and red labels, respectively (the interface at that time colored the full text of positive and negative comments). (Color figure online)

Table 1. Top proposals in Decidim Barcelona by the number of comments. An English translation is indicated in parentheses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aragón, P. et al. (2017). Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67256-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics