Skip to main content

How Polarized Have We Become? A Multimodal Classification of Trump Followers and Clinton Followers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10539))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Polarization in American politics has been extensively documented and analyzed for decades, and the phenomenon became all the more apparent during the 2016 presidential election, where Trump and Clinton depicted two radically different pictures of America. Inspired by this gaping polarization and the extensive utilization of Twitter during the 2016 presidential campaign, in this paper we take the first step in measuring polarization in social media and we attempt to predict individuals’ Twitter following behavior through analyzing ones’ everyday tweets, profile images and posted pictures. As such, we treat polarization as a classification problem and study to what extent Trump followers and Clinton followers on Twitter can be distinguished, which in turn serves as a metric of polarization in general. We apply LSTM to processing tweet features and we extract visual features using the VGG neural network. Integrating these two sets of features boosts the overall performance. We are able to achieve an accuracy of 69%, suggesting that the high degree of polarization recorded in the literature has started to manifest itself in social media as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.denverpost.com/2016/11/04/clinton-derides-trumps-fitness-he-disparages-her-honesty.

  2. 2.

    http://www.people-press.org/2017/02/16/in-first-month-views-of-trump-are-already-strongly-felt-deeply-polarized.

  3. 3.

    Individuals who follow both candidates constitute a surprisingly small portion of the entire follower population. For a more detailed analysis that includes also Bernie Sanders, please see [38].

  4. 4.

    The datasets and codes are available at https://sites.google.com/site/wangyurochester/papers.

References

  1. Barberá, P.: Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Polit. Anal. 23(1), 76–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burger, J.D., Henderson, J., Kim, G., Zarrella, G.: Discriminating gender on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, J.E.: Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, T., Chen, Y., Luo, J.: A selfie is worth a thousand words: mining personal patterns behind user selfie-posting behaviours. In: Proceedings of the 26th International World Wide Web Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doherty, C.: 7 things to know about polarization in America. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Druckman, J.N., Peterson, E., Slothuus, R.: How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107(1), 57–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S.J.: Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 563–588 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580–587 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hare, C., Poole, K.T.: The polarization of contemporary American politics. Polity 46(3), 411–429 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: CVPR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Political Polarization in the American Public

    Google Scholar 

  14. Irsoy, O., Cardie, C.: Opinion mining with deep recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 720–728 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1746–1751 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lai, S., Xu, L., Liu, K., Zhao, J.: Recurrent convolutional neural networks for text classification. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levi, G., Hassner, T.: Age and gender classification using deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 34–42 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, Y., Lei, H., Wu, J., Li, X.: An empirical study on sentiment classification of Chinese review using word embedding. In: Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, P., Joty, S., Meng, H.: Fine-grained opinion mining with recurrent neural networks and word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1433–1443 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Z., Luo, P., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3730–3738 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCarty, N., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H.: Does gerrymandering cause polarization? Am. J. Polit. Sci. 53(3), 666–680 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pascanu, R., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: How to construct deep recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paul, R., Hawkins, S.H., Hall, L.O., Goldgof, D.B., Gillies, R.J.: Combining deep neural network and traditional image features to improve survival prediction accuracy for lung cancer patients from diagnostic CT. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Volkova, S., Lampos, V., Bachrach, Y., Aletras, N.: Studying user income through language, behaviour and affect in social media. PLoS One 10(9), e0138717 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rao, A., Spasojevic, N.: Actionable and political text classification using word embeddings and LSTM. arXiv:1607.02501 (2016)

  28. Sanders, B.: Our Revolution: A Future to Believe. Thomas Dunne Books, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: International Conference on Learning Representations 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stahl, L.: President-elect trump speaks to a divided country on 60 minutes. CBS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Luo, J.: Gender politics in the 2016 U.S. presidential election: a computer vision approach. In: International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, pp. 35–45 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, X.: Pricing the woman card: gender politics between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Luo, J.: Voting with feet: who are leaving Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump? In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Multimedia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhang, X., Luo, J.: Inferring follower preferences in the 2016 US presidential primaries with sparse learning. In: Lee, D., Lin, Y.R., Osgood, N., Thomson, R. (eds.) SBP-BRiMS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10354, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, Y., Li, Y., Luo, J.: Deciphering the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign in the twitter sphere: a comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Y., Liao, H., Feng, Y., Xue, X., Luo, J.: Do they all look the same? Deciphering Chinese, Japanese and Koreans by fine-grained deep learning. arXiv:1610.01854v2 (2016)

  37. Wang, Y., Luo, J., Niemi, R., Li, Y., Hu, T.: Catching fire via ‘likes’: inferring topic preferences of Trump followers on twitter. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, X.: When follow is just one click away: understanding twitter follow behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In: International Conference on Social Informatics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Y., Yuan, J., Luo, J.: To love or to loathe: how is the world reacting to China’s rise? In: Workshop Proceedings International Conference on Data Mining 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ounis, I., Yang, X., Macdonald, C.: Using word embeddings in twitter election classification. arXiv:1606.07006 (2016)

  41. You, Q., Luo, J., Jin, H., Yang, J.: Robust image sentiment analysis using progressively trained and domain transferred deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O.: Recurrent neural network regularization (2015). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2329v5.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge support from the Department of Political Science at the University of Rochester, from the New York State through the Goergen Institute for Data Science, and from our corporate sponsors. We also thank the four anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Hong, Z., Berger, R., Luo, J. (2017). How Polarized Have We Become? A Multimodal Classification of Trump Followers and Clinton Followers. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67216-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67217-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics