Skip to main content

Characterizing Videos, Audience and Advertising in Youtube Channels for Kids

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10539))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Online video services, messaging systems, games and social media services are tremendously popular among young people and children in many countries. Most of the digital services offered on the internet are advertising funded, which makes advertising ubiquitous in children’s everyday life. To understand the impact of advertising-based digital services on children, we study the collective behavior of users of YouTube for kids channels and present the demographics of a large number of users. We collected data from 12,848 videos from 17 channels in US and UK and 24 channels in Brazil. The channels in English have been viewed more than 37 billion times. We also collected more than 14 million comments made by users. Based on a combination of text-analysis and face recognition tools, we show the presence of racial and gender biases in our large sample of users. We also identify children actively using YouTube, although the minimum age for using the service is 13 years in most countries. We provide comparisons of user behavior among the three countries, which represent large user populations in the global North and the global South.

C.S. Araújo and G. Magno—These authors contributed equally to this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.groupm.com.

  2. 2.

    www.statista.com.

  3. 3.

    http://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/.

  4. 4.

    http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/CRF-NER.shtml.

  5. 5.

    http://liwc.wpengine.com/.

  6. 6.

    www.faceplusplus.com/.

  7. 7.

    http://medium.com/@synopsi/what-youtube-looks-like-in-a-day-infographic-d23f8156e599.

  8. 8.

    http://googlediscovery.com/2017/03/23/google-brasil-dados-importantes-sobre-o-google-no-brasil/.

  9. 9.

    http://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1350409?hl=en.

  10. 10.

    www.youtube.com/static?gl=BR&template=terms&hl=pt.

References

  1. Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D.A., Gilbert, E.: Faces engage us: photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 965–974. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benevenuto, F., Pereira, A.C.M., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V.A.F., Almeida, J.M., Gonçalves, M.A.: Characterization and analysis of user profiles in online video sharing systems. JIDM 1(2), 261–276 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benevenuto, F., Rodrigues, T., Cha, M., Almeida, V.: Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, IMC 2009, pp. 49–62. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chester, J.: How Youtube, big data and big brands mean trouble for kids and parents (2015). http://www.alternet.org/media/how-youtube-big-data-and-big-brands-mean-trouble-kids-and-parents. Accessed 13 June 2017

  5. Dehghani, M., Niaki, M.K., Ramezani, I., Sali, R.: Evaluating the influence of Youtube advertising for attraction of young customers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 59, 165–172 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dredge, S.: Why Youtube is the new children’s tv... and why it matters (2015). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/19/youtube-is-the-new-childrens-tv-heres-why-that-matters. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  7. Dredge, S.: Joseph garrett, the children’s presenter with 7.8 million subscribers (2016). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/28/stampy-joseph-garrett-youtube-childrens-presenter-millions-of-viewers. Accessed 13 June 2017

  8. Livingstone, S.: Children’s digital rights: a priority. Intermedia 42(4/5), 20–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Livingstone, S.: Digital media and children’s rights (2014). http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2014/09/12/sonia-livingstone-digital-media-and-childrens-rights/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  10. Livingstone, S., Local, C.: Measurement matters: difficulties in defining and measuring children’s television viewing in a changing media landscape. Media Int. Aust. 163(1), 67–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lupianez-Villanueva, F., Gaskell, G., Veltri, G., Theben, A., Folkford, F., Bonatti, L., Bogliacino, F., Fernandez, L., Marek, E., Codagnone, C.: Study on the impact of marketing through social media, online games and mobile applications on children’s behaviour (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/behavioural_research/impact_media_marketing_study/index_en.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  12. Magno, G., Comarela, G., Saez-Trumper, D., Cha, M., Almeida, V.: New kid on the block: exploring the Google+ social graph. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Internet Measurement Conference, IMC 2012, pp. 159–170. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Keeffe, G.S., Clarke-Pearson, K.: The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics 127(4), 800–804 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Global Commission on Internet Governance. One internet (2016). https://www.ourinternet.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/GCIG_Final%20Report%20-%20USB.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  15. Ottoni, R., Pesce, J.P., Las Casas, D.B., Franciscani Jr., G., Meira Jr., W., Kumaraguru, P., Almeida, V.A.: Ladies first: analyzing gender roles and behaviors in Pinterest. In: ICWSM. The AAAI Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., Booth, R.J.: The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2007. This article is published by LIWC Inc, Austin, Texas 78703 USA in conjunction with the LIWC2007 software program

    Google Scholar 

  17. Przybylski, A.K., Nash, V.: Internet filtering technology and aversive online experiences in adolescents. J. Pediatrics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., Kardefelt-Winther, D.: Global kids online: researching children’s rights globally in the digital age. Global Stud. Childhood 6(4), 455–466 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Westenberg, W.: The influence of Youtubers on teenagers: a descriptive research about the role Youtubers play in the life of their teenage viewers. M.Sc dissertation, University of Twente, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by CNPq, CAPES, FAPEMIG, and the projects InWeb, MASWEB, and INCT-Cyber.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camila Souza Araújo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

A Appendix 1

Table 3. Dataset fields
Fig. 9.
figure 9

Comments and Likes X Video Duration.

Fig. 10.
figure 10

Demographics of audience by channel

B Appendix 2 - Semantics

In this analysis we want to measure how the video was evaluated by the viewers. We use the text of the comments as a proxy for the perception of the audience, looking into the semantics it contains. We focus on only two categories of LIWC: Positive Emotions and Negative Emotions. Since the LIWC is available only for the English language, we inspect only comments from the U.S. channels.

Figure 11 (Appendix) presents the percentage of the comments that contain words related to positive emotions or negative emotions, according to LIWC. We aggregate the comments by channel, video category, gender and age group. The predominance of positive emotions is notorious, indicating that the videos are, in general, well evaluated by the public. Interestingly, some channels have a higher proportion of positive words than others, such as US+UK_11 and US+UK_9. Regarding the video categories, we observe that videos with make up are more positive than the others. Looking into the social groups, there are no huge differences, although we observe an indication that the use of positive words seems to decrease as the audience get older.

Fig. 11.
figure 11

Percentage of comments containing words of positive and negative emotion

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Araújo, C.S., Magno, G., Meira, W., Almeida, V., Hartung, P., Doneda, D. (2017). Characterizing Videos, Audience and Advertising in Youtube Channels for Kids. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67216-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67217-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics