Skip to main content

Ontological Modelling of a Psychiatric Clinical Practice Guideline

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10505))

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) serve to transfer results from evidence-based medicine into clinical practice. There is growing interest in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) implementing the guideline recommendations; research on such systems typically considers combinations of workflow languages with knowledge representation formalisms. Here, we report on experience with an OWL-based proof-of-concept implementation of parts of the German S3 guideline for schizophrenia. From the information-technological point of view, the salient feature of our implementation is that it represents the CPG entirely as a logic-based ontology, without resorting, e.g., to rule-based action formalisms or hard-wired workflows to capture clinical pathways. Our current goal is to establish that such an implementation is feasible; long-range benefits we expect from the approach are modularity of CPG implementation, ease of maintenance, and logical unity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    is open source, and available at http://www8.cs.fau.de/research/cgm.

References

  1. Abidi, S., Abidi, S., Hussain, S., Shepherd, M.: Ontology-based modeling of clinical practice guidelines: A clinical decision support system for breast cancer follow-up interventions at primary care settings. In: MEDINFO 2007, pp. 845–849. IOS Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abidi, S., Cox, J., Abidi, S., Shepherd, M.: Using OWL ontologies for clinical guidelines based comorbid decision support. In: Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science, HICSS 2012, pp. 3030–3038. IEEE Comp. Soc. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beierle, C., Eisele, L., Kern-Isberner, G., Meyer, R.G., Nietzke, M.: Using ontological knowledge about active pharmaceutical ingredients for a decision support system in medical cancer therapy. In: Friedrich, G., Helmert, M., Wotawa, F. (eds.) KI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9904, pp. 119–125. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46073-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouamrane, M.-M., Rector, A., Hurrell, M.: A hybrid architecture for a preoperative decision support system using a rule engine and a reasoner on a clinical ontology. In: Polleres, A., Swift, T. (eds.) RR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5837, pp. 242–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05082-4_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (ed.) Behandlungsleitlinie Schizophrenie. In: Gaebel, W., Falkai, P. (eds.) Steinkopff, Darmstadt (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doulaverakis, C., Koutkias, V., Antoniou, G., Kompatsiaris, I.: Applying SPARQL-based inference and ontologies for modelling and execution of clinical practice guidelines: a case study on hypertension management. In: Riaño, D., Lenz, R., Reichert, M. (eds.) KR4HC/ProHealth -2016. LNCS, vol. 10096, pp. 90–107. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55014-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg, A., Adhikari, N., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M., Devereaux, P., Beyene, J., Sam, J., Haynes, R.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293, 1223–1238 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jafarpour, B., Abidi, S.R., Abidi, S.S.R.: Exploiting semantic web technologies to develop OWL-based clinical practice guideline execution engines. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 20, 388–398 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kashyap, V., Morales, A., Hongsermeier, T.: On implementing clinical decision support: achieving scalability and maintainability by combining business rules and ontologies. In: AMIA Annual Symposium, vol. 2006, pp. 414–418. AMIA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, D., Burstein, M., McDermott, D., McIlraith, S., Paolucci, M., Sycara, K., McGuinness, D., Sirin, E., Srinivasan, N.: Bringing semantics to web services with OWL-S. World Wide Web, WWW 2007 10, 243–277 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mehdi, A., Rudolph, S., Grimm, S.: Epistemic querying of OWL knowledge bases. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 397–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21034-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Peleg, M.: Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J. Biomed. Inform. 46, 44–763 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., Hall, R., Johnson, P., Jones, N., Kumar, A., Miksch, S., Quaglini, S., Seyfang, A., Shortliffe, E., Stefanelli, M.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J. AMIA 10, 52–68 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rector, A., Rogers, J., Zanstra, P., van der Haring, E.: OpenGALEN: Open source medical terminology and tools. In: AMIA Annual Symposium, p. 982. AMIA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schulz, S., Stenzhorn, H., Boeker, M., Smith, B.: Strengths and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. Rev. Electron. Comun. Inf. Inov. Saude 3, 31–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sesen, M., Banares-Alcántara, R., Fox, J., Kadir, T., Brady, J.: Lung Cancer Assistant: an ontology-driven, online decision support prototype for lung cancer treatment selection. In: OWL: Experiences and Directions Workshop, OWLED 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sirin, E., Parsia, B.: SPARQL-DL: SPARQL query for OWL-DL. In: OWL: Experiences and Directions, OWLED 2007. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tao, C., Wei, W., Solbrig, H., Savova, G., Chute, C.: CNTRO: A semantic web ontology for temporal relation inferencing in clinical narratives. In: Annual Sympposium on AMIA, pp. 787–791 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Trivedi, M., Kern, J., Grannemann, B., Altshuler, K., Sunderajan, P.: A computerized clinical decision support system as a means of implementing depression guidelines. Psych. Serv. 55, 879–885 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ye, Y., Jiang, Z., Diao, X., Yang, D., Du, G.: An ontology-based hierarchical semantic modeling approach to clinical pathway workflows. Comp. Bio. Med. 39, 722–732 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Schröder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gorín, D., Meyn, M., Naumann, A., Polzer, M., Rabenstein, U., Schröder, L. (2017). Ontological Modelling of a Psychiatric Clinical Practice Guideline. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Fürnkranz, J., Thimm, M. (eds) KI 2017: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10505. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67190-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67190-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67189-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67190-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics