Skip to main content

Remote Sensing of Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands: Comparison of Pixel-Based, Principal Component, and Object-Oriented Image Classification Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands

Abstract

The application of remote sensing techniques in threatened ecosystems such as the Galapagos Islands has shown to be a powerful tool for decision-making. Specifically in the case of San Cristobal Island, it will allow accurate mapping and modeling techniques at relatively low costs for battling invasive species such as guava and wax apple. This research evaluates the performance of three classification techniques for land cover mapping in the agricultural area of San Cristobal in the Galapagos: (a) pixel-based hybrid (supervised/unsupervised classification), (b) principal component pixel-based hybrid, and (c) object-oriented image hybrid classifications. An evaluation of three parametric classification algorithms (maximum likelihood, Mahalanobis distance, and minimum distances) for classification technique was also performed. The goal was to compare and identify the best approach for determining LULC with a focus on invasive species such as guava in the highland territory. The results for both pixel-based approaches are superior than the object-based approach. Nevertheless, it was evident that the principal component classifications tend to mix signature responses and did not show the same discrimination ability. Per-pixel/hybrid classification with maximum likelihood and Mahalanobis distance performs a superior kappa index of 0.8640 and 0.8610, respectively, proving to be more sensitive toward identifying invasive species such as guava and wax apple fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Seijmonsbergen AC, Duivenvoorden JF (2012) Optimizing land cover classification accuracy for change detection, a combined pixel-based and object-based approach in a mountainous area in Mexico. Appl Geogr 34:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aplin P, Atkinson PM (2001) Sub-pixel cover mapping for per-field classification. Int J Remote Sens 22(14):2853–2858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos JC, Bottino MJ (1997) The discrimination of scenes by principal components analysis of multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 18(11):2437–2449. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697217701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coello S, Saunders A (2011). Final project evaluation: control of invasive species in the Galapagos Archipelago, ECU/00/G31

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremers L (2002) Irrigated agriculture on the Galapagos Islands: fit for survival. Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Desclée B, Bogaert P, Defourny P (2006) Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sens Environ 102:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro DC, Franklin SE, Dubé MG (2012) A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens Environ 118:259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENVI EX (2009) ENVI EX user’s guide. ENVI EX tutorial

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdas Inc (1999) ERDAS field guide. Imagine, 5th edn. ERDAS, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss J (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76:378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80(1):185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González JA, Montes C, Rodríguez J, Tapia W (2008) Rethinking the Galapagos Islands as a complex social-ecological system: implications for conservation and management. Ecol Soc 13(2):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenier C (2000) Conservation contre nature: Les Iles Galápagos (IRD). Collection Latitudes 23, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-Y, Asner GP (2009) Applications of remote sensing to alien invasive plant studies. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 9(6):4869–4889. https://doi.org/10.3390/s90604869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im J, Jensen J, Tullis J (2008) Object-based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation techniques. Int J Remote Sens 29:399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INEC (2010) Censo de Población y Vivienda. Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi C (2006) Mapping cryptic invaders and invasibility of tropical forest ecosystems: Chromolaena odorata in Nepal. International Institute for Geo-information Science & Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yeh AGO (1998) Principal component analysis of stacked multi-temporal images for the monitoring of rapid urban expansion in the Pearl River Delta. Int J Remote Sens 19(8):1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd CD, Berberoglu S, Atkinson PM, Curran PJ (2004) A comparison of texture measures for the per-field classification of Mediterranean land cover. Int J Remote Sens 25:3943–3965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28(5):823–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600746456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani R (1999) Sampling guide: food security and nutrition monitoring. USAID, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina J, Walsh S (2001) 2.5D morphogenesis: modeling landuse and landcover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plant Ecol 156(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina JP, Crews-Meyer KA, Walsh SJ (2000) Scale dependent pattern metrics and panel data analysis as applied in a multiphase hybrid landcover classification scheme. In: Proc. 2000 ASPRS conf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, S.B (2010) Protocolo Metodológico para la generación del Mapa de Deforestación Histórica en el Ecuador continental. MAE, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio del Ambiente (2013) Programa de control y erradicación de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reducción de la vulnerabilidad de especies endémicas y nativas de las islas Galápagos. San Cristobal, Parque Nacional Galápagos

    Google Scholar 

  • Myint SW, Giri CP, Wang L, Zhu Z, Gillette S (2008) Identifying mangrove species and their surrounding land use and land cover classes using an object oriented approach with a lacunarity spatial measure. GISci Remote Sens 45:188–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ 115(5):1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Mather P (2003) An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 86:554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Mather P (2004) Assessment of the effectiveness of support vector machines for hyperspectral data. Futur Gener Comput Syst 20:1215–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Registro Oficial No. 520 (2015) Ley Orgánica de Régimen Especial de la Provincia de Galápagos. Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP (2012) An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 67:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenstein O, Karnieli A (2011) Comparison of methods for land-use classification incorporating remote sensing and GIS inputs. Appl Geogr 31(2):533–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott JR (1997) Remote sensing: the image chain approach. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits PC, Dellepiane SG, Schowengerdt RA (1999) Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and proposal for a cost-based approach. Int J Remote Sens 20:1461–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South S, Qi J, Lusch D (2004) Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices. Remote Sens Environ 91:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayor PJ (1977) Quantitative methods in geography: an introduction to spatial analysis. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JE, Hardner J, Stewart M (2006) Ecotourism and economic growth in the Galapagos: an island economy-wide analysis. Environ Dev Econ 14:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UICN (2007) Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage: thirty-fourth session (31 COM). Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • UICN (2010a) Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage: thirty-fourth session (34 COM). Understanding the politics of heritage. Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.048

  • UICN (2010b) Decision: 34 COM 8C.3. http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/4242. Accessed 13 Sept 2016

  • UICN (2016) Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage: thirty-fourth session (40 COM). Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer F, Scmidt KS, Bakker A, Bokler W (2002) Environmental modelling with GIS and RS. In: New environmental RS systems. Taylor and Francis, London, p 26–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside TG, Boggs GS, Maier SW (2011) Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 13(6):884–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GG (2005) Results and implications of a study of fifteen years of satellite image classification experiments. Computer 43(3):433–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Z, Roberts C, Johnson B (2008) Object-based target search using remotely sensed data: a case study in detecting invasive exotic Australian Pine in south Florida. J Photogramm Remote Sens 63(6):647–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan G, Maathuis BHP, Xiangmin Z, Van Dijk PM (2006) Comparison of pixel based and object oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. Int J Remote Sens 27(18):4039–4055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina, J. P., Crews-Meyer, K. A. & Walsh, S. J (2000) Scale dependent pattern metrics and panel data analysis as applied in a multiphase hybrid landcover classification scheme. Proc. 2000 ASPRS Conf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Sampedro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sampedro, C., Mena, C.F. (2018). Remote Sensing of Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands: Comparison of Pixel-Based, Principal Component, and Object-Oriented Image Classification Approaches. In: Torres, M., Mena, C. (eds) Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands. Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67177-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics