Interactions Among Exotics: Guava and Its Associated Fauna in the Highlands of San Cristobal

  • Stella de la Torre
  • Isabel Villarruel
  • Anais Córdova-Páez
  • Ximena Herrera-Alvarez
Chapter
Part of the Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands book series (SESGI)

Abstract

To assess the effects of guava on the community of soil invertebrates, we compared carbon and nitrogen concentrations in soil and plant tissues, and the diversity of soil invertebrates, between two areas with similar altitude and climate but which differ in the presence of guava in the highlands of San Cristobal Island. On the other hand, to analyze how guava could be affected by animal communities, we present a preliminary evaluation of introduced mammals’ role as seed dispersers of this invasive species.

Fieldwork was carried out from 2011 through 2013 for 1 month in the dry and 1 month in the rainy season. Data on soil pH and snail diversity was gathered in the dry season of 2015. We collected soil and leaf samples from ten 1-m2 plots randomly selected at one site with pasture and guava and at a restoration site with native plant species. These samples were analyzed to assess their nitrogen and carbon contents. The diversity of soil invertebrates was assessed by carrying out surveys in subplots of 25 cm2 in each of the 1-m2 plots in the study areas. We focused the surveys on the diversity of the taxonomic orders of soil invertebrates and on the species diversity of ants and land snails. To evaluate the role of introduced mammals as guava seed dispersers, we randomly collected 24 fecal samples from cattle and 21 from horses that were using the area of pasture and guava. We later compared the number of seeds per gram of dried feces for both species. We found a significantly lower nitrogen concentration in soil and leaf tissue in the pasture-guava site. This could be related to a decrease of nitrogen availability resulting from a process of soil acidification that occurred over time as a result of a high rate of nitrogen deposition. We did not find significant differences in the community structure of soil invertebrates between sites using any of the three approaches. Both sites shared most of the taxonomic orders. When focusing on the species diversity of ants and land snails, differences in diversity were not significant either. Of the ten species of ants we recorded, eight are introduced species. We found two introduced species and five native species of land snails; the abundance of the introduced snails, though, was higher than the abundance of native species in both study areas. We found a higher number of seeds per gram of dried horse feces, suggesting that horses are more effective dispersers of the guava than cattle. Our results point to the complexity of the interactions between exotic plants and animals. These interactions have altered the terrestrial environments in Galapagos in ways that still need to be fully understood.

Keywords

San Cristobal Guava Nutrients pH Soil invertebrates Seed dispersion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by GAIA Grants 2011, 2012, and 2015 from the Universidad San Francisco de Quito. The Galapagos National Park allowed us to conduct this research (research permits PC-30-11, PC-25-12, and PC-5-15 to Stella de la Torre). We acknowledge Martina Avilés, Pablo Yépez, Jeffreys Málaga, Franziska Feldmann, Jael Martínez, Diego Pombosa, and Stephanie Anchaluisa for their valuable assistance in the field. Geovanny Sarigu from Hacienda La Tranquila kindly allowed us to carry out the field research in this area and constantly supported our fieldwork. Our special thanks to Carlos F. Mena, Sofía Tacle, Maryuri Yépez, Juan Pablo Muñoz, Leandro Vaca, Sylvia Sotamba, Courtney Butnor, Cecibel Narváez, María Angélica Moreano, Diana Amoguimba, Mariuxi López, Máximo Ochoa, and all the personnel from the Galapagos Science Center for their support to our research and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Bobbink R, Bal D, van Dobben HF, Jansen AJM, Nijssen M, Siepel H, Schamineé JHJ, Smits NAC, de Vries W (2012) The effects of nitrogen deposition on the structure and functioning of ecosystems. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/platform/documents/part-i-chapter_2_nov-2012_2013-09-10_en.pdf
  2. Buddenhagen C, Jewell KJ (2006) Invasive plant seed viability after processing by some endemic Galapagos birds. Ornitol Neotrop 17:73–80Google Scholar
  3. Causton C, Herrera HW, Lincango MP (2014) CDF checklist of Galapagos introduced invertebrates—FCD Lista de especies de Invertebrados introducidos Galápagos. In: Bungartz F, Herrera H, Jaramillo P, Tirado N, Jiménez-Uzcátegui G, Ruiz D, Guézou A, Ziemmeck F (eds) Charles Darwin Foundation Galapagos species checklist—Lista de Especies de Galápagos de la Fundación Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin Foundation/Fundación Charles Darwin, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos. http://www.darwinfoundation.org/datazone/checklists/introduced-species/introduced-invertebrates/. Last updated: 21 May 2014Google Scholar
  4. De la Torre S (2013) Research in agricultural and urban areas in Galapagos—a biological perspective. In: Walsh S, Mena C (eds) Science and conservation in the Galapagos Islands. Springer Science & Media, New York, pp 185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vries T, Black J (1983) On men, goats & guava—problems caused by introduced species in the Galapagos. Noticias Galápagos 38:18–21Google Scholar
  6. Global Invasive Species Database (2016) Species profile: Wasmannia auropunctata. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=58 on 02-05-2016
  7. Guézou A, Trueman M, Buddenhagen CE, Chamorro S, Guerrero AM, Pozo P, Atkinson R (2010) An extensive alien plant inventory from the inhabited areas of Galapagos. PLoS One 5:e10276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamann O (1991) Indigenous and alien plants in the Galapagos Islands: problems of conservation and development. In: Tropical Botanic Gardens: their role in conservation and development. Academic, London, pp 169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrera HW (2015) AntWeb: Galapagos ants. https://www.antweb.org/taxonomicPage.do?rank=species&countryName=Galapagos%20Islands on 03-05-2016
  10. Itow S (2004) Zonation pattern, succession process and invasion by aliens in species-poor insular vegetation of the Galapagos Islands. Glob Environ Res 7(1):39–58Google Scholar
  11. Jager H, Alencastro MJ, Kaupenjohann M, Kowarik I (2013) Ecosystem changes in Galapagos highlands by the invasive tree Cinchona pubescens. Plant Soil 371:629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lubin YD (1984) Changes in the native fauna of the Galapagos Islands following invasion by the little red fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata. Biol J Linn Soc 21:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller BW, Breckheimer I, McCleary AL, Guzmán-Ramirez L, Caplow SC, Jones-Smith JC, Walsh SJ (2010) Using stylized agent-based models for population-environment research: a case study from the Galapagos Islands. Popul Environ 75:279–287Google Scholar
  14. Ordoñez JC (2010) Environmental filtering vs. natural variation and plant strategies: key components of plant trait modulation by nutrient supply. Thesis 2010-01 of the Institute of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Patz JA, Graczy TK, Geller N, Vittor AY (2000) Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol 30:1395–1405Google Scholar
  16. Schlesinger WH (1991) Biogeochemistry, an analysis of global change. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Schofield EK (1989) Effects of introduced plants and animals on island vegetation: examples from the Galapagos Archipelago. Conserv Biol 3:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Snell HL, Tye A, Causton CE, Bensted-Smith R (2002) Current status of and threats to the terrestrial biodiversity of Galapagos. In: A biodiversity vision for the Galapagos Islands. By Charles Darwin Foundation and World Wildlife Fund, Puerto Ayora, GalapagosGoogle Scholar
  19. Tye A (2000) Plantas amenazadas y acciones de manejo en varias islas del archipiélago. Informe Galápagos 1999-2000. Fundación NaturaGoogle Scholar
  20. Tye A (2002) Revisión del estado de amenazas de la flora endémica de Galápagos. Informe Galápagos 2001-2002. Fundación Natura, pp 116–122Google Scholar
  21. Van Arendonk JCM, Niemann GJ, Boon JJ, Lambers H (1997) Effects of nitrogen supply on the anatomy and chemical composition of leaves of four grass species belonging to the genus Poa, as determined by image-processing analysis and pyrolysis mass spectrometry. Plant Cell Environ 20:881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Villarruel I, de la Torre S (2014) Estudio preliminar de caracoles terrestresen la Isla San Cristóbal, Galápagos. Av Cienc Ing 6:B32–B37Google Scholar
  23. Walsh SJ, Mc Cleary A, Mena CF, Shao C, Tuttle Y, González JP, Atkinson R (2007) QuickBird and Hyperion data analysis of an invasive plant species in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador: implications for control and land use management. Special Issue on Earth Observation for Biodiversity and Ecology. Remote Sensing of Environment, Douglas M. Muchoney, Senior Scientific Expert, GEO Secretariat, Guest EditorGoogle Scholar
  24. Weidenhamer JD, Callaway RM (2010) Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J Chem Ecol 36:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wetterer J, Porter S (2003) The Little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: distribution, impact and control. Sociobiology 41:1–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stella de la Torre
    • 1
  • Isabel Villarruel
    • 1
  • Anais Córdova-Páez
    • 1
  • Ximena Herrera-Alvarez
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.Universidad Regional Amazónica IkiamTenaEcuador

Personalised recommendations