Skip to main content

Stakeholder Perceptions of Invasive Species and Participatory Remote Sensing in the Galapagos Islands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands

Abstract

Novel methods for combining physical and social science research programs can integrate traditional research methods, stakeholder engagement, and environmental management. This chapter applies a participatory remote sensing approach to evaluate stakeholder perceptions of the presence of invasive plant species on Isabela Island, in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador. An exercise on classification and change detection was carried out with agricultural landowners and employees of the Galapagos National Park Service, using photographs of different types of land cover commonly observed in the highland agricultural zone and surrounding National Park. Photos corresponded to GPS-validated locations within the spatial footprint of high-resolution satellite images from 2004 to 2010. Stakeholder classifications of remotely sensed imagery reveal competing accounts of the makeup of the land, with a high level of disagreement between the two (kappa = 0.39). An analysis of “shared” guava coverage and other introduced vegetation highlights key regions of agreement and divergence in land cover, land change, and land use—especially along the boundary between the farmland and the National Park. Change detection of landowner classifications showed a 19% decrease in guava within the National Park between 2004 and 2010, while the National Park Service employees perceived a 62% increase in the same region. Stakeholder perceptions of the Isabela highlands also differ qualitatively, where current environmental management initiatives focused on the consequences, rather than the causes, of species invasion. The results of this study provide compelling arguments for using participatory research methods as a tool to directly engage stakeholders in the research process and reconcile visions of productivity or degradation in shared spaces for conservation and economic activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Binggeli P (2001) The human dimensions of invasive woody plants. In: McNeely JA (ed) The great reshuffling: human dimension of invasive alien species. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja R, Perez J (2000) Parque Nacional Galápagos. Dinámicas migratorias y sus efectos en el uso de los recursos naturales. Fundación Natura and The Nature Conservancy, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown G (2006) Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. Int J Tour Res 8(2):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadag J, Gaillard J (2012) Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: the contribution of participatory mapping. Area 44(1):100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiriboga R, Fonseca B, Maignan S (2006) Zonificación agroecológica de las zonas agropecuarias en relación con las especies invasoras. Sistema de Investigación de la Problemática Agraria del Ecuador, Puerto Ayora

    Google Scholar 

  • De Andrade MMN, Szlafsztein CF (2015) Community participation in flood mapping in the Amazon through interdisciplinary methods. Nat Hazards 78:1491–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries T, Black J (1983) Of men, goats and guava—problems caused by introduced species in the Galapagos. Not Galapagos 38:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis R, Mayer J, Applegate G, Chokkalingam U, Colfer C, Kurniawan L, Lachowski H, Maus P, Permana R, Ruchait Y, Stolle R, Suyanto S, Tomich T (2005) Fire, people and pixels: linking social science and remote sensing to understanding underlying causes and impacts of fires in Indonesia. Hum Ecol 33(4):465–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan S, Lach D (2006) GIS technology in natural resource management: process as a tool of change. Cartography 41(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt RC (1972) Introduced plants and animals in the Galapagos Islands. BioScience 22(10):585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans TP, Kelley H (2004) Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of land cover change. J Environ Manage 72(1–2):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galapagos National Park Service (GNPS) (2009) Santa Cruz: Media Luna, Los Gemelos, El Chato, Zona de Pampa, and the road to Baltra. http://www.galapagospark.org/nophprg.php?page=parque_nacional_introducidas_plantas_santa_cruz. Accessed 8 Sept 2010

  • Gordillo J, Tupiza A (1989) La sublevación de 1958 en la colonia penal de Isabela. Trama Rev Arquitect 49:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Guézou A, Trueman M, Buddenhagen CE, Chamorro S, Guerrero AM, Pozo P, Atkinson R (2010) An extensive alien plant inventory from the inhabited areas of Galapagos. PLoS One 5(4):e10276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman G, Janetos A, Justice C, Moran E, Mustard J, Rindfuss R, Skole D, Turner BL II (2004) Land change science: observing, monitoring, and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth’s surface. Kluwer Academic, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy P, Knapp G (2003) Maps of, by, and for the peoples of Latin America. Hum Organ 62(4):303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F (2008) Verdes gotas de vida. FUNDAR-Galápagos, Puerto Ayora

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censos (INEC) (2010) Censo de población y vivienda, Galápagos 2010. INEC, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos and Consejo de Gobierno del Régimen Especial de Galápagos (INEC-CGREG) (2010) Encuesta condiciones de vida 2009. INEC-CGREG, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Itow S (1971) A study of vegetation in the Galapagos Islands. Not Galapagos 17:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Itow S (2003) Zonation pattern, succession process and invasion by aliens in species-poor insular vegetation of the Galapagos Islands. Global Environ Res 7(1):39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2007) Remote sensing of the environment: an Earth resource perspective. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H (2003) Stories remote sensing can tell: integrating remote sensing analysis with ethnographic research in the study of cultural landscapes. Hum Ecol 31(2):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malanson GP, Zeng Y, Walsh SJ (2006) Landscape frontiers, geography frontiers: lessons to be learned. Prof Geogr 58:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews S, Burton L, Detwiler J (2001) Viewing people and places: conceptual and methodological issues in coupling geographic information analysis and ethnographic research. In: GIS and critical geographic research. Hunter College, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall M, Dunn C (2012) Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: fulfilling the criteria of good governance. Geoforum 43(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleary AL (2013) Characterizing contemporary land use/cover change on Isabela Island, Galapagos. In: Walsh SJ, Mena CF (eds) Social and ecological interactions in the Galapagos Islands: frameworks and perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina JP, Walsh SJ (2001) Morphogenesis: modeling land use and land cover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plant Ecol 156(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer WB, Turner BL II (1994) Global land-use/land-cover change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins J (2004) Contesting the boundaries of international justice: State countermapping and offshore resource struggles between east Timor and Australia. Econ Geogr 80(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry R (1984) Galapagos. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentería JL, Atkinson R, Guerrero AM, Mader J (2006) Manual de identificación y manejo de malezas. Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P (2001) Fixed categories in a portable landscape: the causes and consequences of land-cover categorization. Environ Plan A 33:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P (2003) Beyond ground truth: GIS and the environmental knowledge of herders, professional foresters, and other traditional communities. Hum Ecol 31(2):233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau D (1995) Maps, numbers, text, and context: mixing methods in feminist political ecology. Prof Geogr 47(4):458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J (1989) Una agricultura exigua en un espacio rural singular. Trama Rev Arquitect 49:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström P, Pahlén TG, Edenius L, Tømmervik H, Hagner O, Hemberg L, Olsson H, Baer K, Stenlund T, Brandt LG, Egberth M (2003) Conflict resolution by participatory management: remote sensing and GIS as tools for communicating land-use needs for reindeer herding in Sweden. Ambio 32(8):557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield EK (1989) Effects of introduced plants and animals on island vegetation—examples from the Galapagos Archipelago. Conserv Biol 3(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz A, Bonzon K, Fujita R, Benjamin N, Woodling N, Black P, Steinback C (2004) Participatory socioeconomic analysis: drawing on fishermen’s knowledge for marine protected area planning in California. Mar Policy 28(4):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servicio de Información y Censo Agropecuario del Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganaderia (SICA-MAG) (2002) III Censo Nacional Agropecuario, Resultados Provinciales Galápagos. SICA-MAG, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, Y (1997) Competitive relationships between tree species of Scalesia (S. pedunculata, S. cordata, S. microcephala) and introduced plants (Cinchona succirubra, Psidium guajava, Lantana camara) with reference to regeneration mechanism of Scalesia forests in the Galapagos Islands. Institute for Applied Geography, Komazawa University, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Woodcock CE, Seto KC, Lenney MP, Macomber SA (2001) Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sens Environ 75(2):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone CP, Loope LL, Smith CW (1988) Conservation biology in the Galapagos archipelago: perspectives from Hawaii. Elapio 48(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R (2009) Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodivers Conserv 18(10):2563–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman M, Atkinson R, Guézou AP, Wurm P (2010) Residence time and human-induced propagule pressure at work in the alien flora of Galapagos. Biol Invasions 12:3949–3960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (2001) Invasive plant problems and requirements for weed risk assessment in the Galapagos Islands. In: Groves RH, Virtue JG, Panetta FD (eds) Weed risk assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 153–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (2006) Can we infer island introduction and naturalization rates from inventory data? Evidence from introduced plants in Galapagos. Biol Invasions 8(2):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2006) Joint IUCN/UNESCO mission report: Galapagos Islands. WHC-06/30.COM.7B. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilema H, Carrion C, Gordillo P (2003) Plan estrategico del Cantón Isabela. Gobierno Municipal de Isabela, Puerto Villamil

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SJ, Mena CF, Shao Y, McCleary AL, Tuttle JP, Erlien CM (2006) Characterization of invasive plant species in the Galapagos Islands: experimental remote sensing image processing for selected test sites. Centro de Levantamientos Integrados de Recursos Naturales por Sensores Remotos (CLIRSEN), Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SJ, McCleary AL, Mena CF, Shao Y, Tuttle JP, Gonzalez A, Atkinson R (2008) QuickBird and Hyperion data analysis of an invasive plant species in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador: implications for control and land use management. Remote Sens Environ 112(5):1927–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SJ, McCleary AL, Heumann BW, Brewington L, Raczkowski EJ (2010) Community expansion and infrastructure development: implications for human health and environmental quality in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador. J Latin Am Geogr 9(3):137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the participants from Isabela Island who contributed to this work. The Inter-American Foundation provided funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Brewington .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brewington, L. (2018). Stakeholder Perceptions of Invasive Species and Participatory Remote Sensing in the Galapagos Islands. In: Torres, M., Mena, C. (eds) Understanding Invasive Species in the Galapagos Islands. Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67177-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics