When It Comes to Querying Semantic Cultural Heritage Data

  • Béatrice MarkhoffEmail author
  • Thanh Binh Nguyen
  • Cheikh Niang
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 767)


As more and more cultural institutions publish their data using the web-of-data semantic level, there is a need for novel applications for exploring, analyzing, mining and visualizing such data. A first step for these applications is to be able to query the linked open data. In this paper we survey the different existing systems for this purpose, providing examples from our experiences in the Cultural Heritage domain, and discussing some possible mutual enrichment between some of them.


Semantic web Querying SPARQL endpoint Federated-query system Ontology-Based Data Integration Cultural Heritage 


  1. 1.
    Acosta, M., Vidal, M.-E., Lampo, T., Castillo, J., Ruckhaus, E.: ANAPSID: an adaptive query processing engine for SPARQL endpoints. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data - the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouchou, B., Niang, C.: Semantic mediator querying. In: International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS), pp. 29–38. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calvanese, D., Cogrel, B., Komla-Ebri, S., Kontchakov, R., Lanti, D., Rezk, M., Rodriguez-Muro, M., Xiao, G.: Ontop: answering SPARQL queries over relational databases. Semant. Web 8, 471–487 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calvanese, D., Liuzzo, P., Mosca, A., Remesal, J., Rezk, M., Rull, G.: Ontology-based data integration in EPNet: production and distribution of food during the Roman Empire. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 51, 212–229 (2016). Mining the Humanities: Technologies and ApplicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cruz, I.F., Xiao, H.: Ontology driven data integration in heterogeneous networks. In: Tolk, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Complex Systems in Knowledge-Based Environments: Theory, Models and Applications. SCI, vol. 168, pp. 75–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-88075-2_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damova, M., Dannells, D.: Reason-able view of linked data for cultural heritage. In: Dicheva, D., Markov, Z., Stefanova, E. (eds.) Third International Conference on Software, Services and Semantic Technologies S3T 2011, vol. 101, pp. 17–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23163-6_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doerr, M.: Ontologies for cultural heritage. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 463–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doerr, M., Iorizzo, D.: The dream of a global knowledge network – a new approach. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 1(1), 5:1–5:23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felicetti, A., Gerth, P., Meghini, C., Theodoridou, M.: Integrating heterogeneous coin datasets in the context of archaeological research. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extending, Mapping and Focusing the CRM Co-Located with 19th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Poznań, Poland, pp. 13–27, 17 September 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta, S., Szekely, P., Knoblock, C.A., Goel, A., Taheriyan, M., Muslea, M.: Karma: a system for mapping structured sources into the semantic web. In: Simperl, E., Norton, B., Mladenic, D., Della Valle, E., Fundulaki, I., Passant, A., Troncy, R. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7540, pp. 430–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46641-4_40 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartig, O.: Querying a web of linked data: foundations and query execution. In: SIGWEB Newsletter, vol. 2014, no. Autumn, pp. 3:1–3:2 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartig, O., Özsu, M.T.: Walking without a map: ranking-based traversal for querying linked data. In: Groth, P., Simperl, E., Gray, A., Sabou, M., Krötzsch, M., Lecue, F., Flöck, F., Gil, Y. (eds.) ISWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9981, pp. 305–324. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46523-4_19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: PODS, pp. 233–246 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marden, J., Li-Madeo, C., Whysel, N., Edelstein, J.: Linked open data for cultural heritage: evolution of an information technology. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2013, pp. 107–112. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Minadakis, N., Marketakis, Y., Kondylakis, H., Flouris, G., Theodoridou, M., de Jong, G., Doerr, M.: X3ML framework: an effective suite for supporting data mappings. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extending, Mapping and Focusing the CRM Co-Located with 19th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Poznań, Poland, pp. 1–12, 17 September 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niang, C., Marinica, C., Leboucher, E., Bouiller, L., Capderou, C., Bouchou, B.: Ontology-based data integration system for conservation-restoration data (OBDIS-CR). In: 20th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, IDEAS 2016, Montreal, Canada, pp. 218–223, 11–13 July 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Niang, X., Marinica, C., Markhoff, B.B., Leboucher, E., Laissus, F., Malavergne, O., Bouiller, L., Darrieumerlou, C., Capderou, C.: Supporting semantic interoperability in conservation-restoration domain the parcours project. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) - Special Issue on Digital Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage 10, 16 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oldman, D., Doerr, M., de Jong, G., Norton, B., Wikman, T.: Realizing lessons of the last 20 years: a manifesto for data provisioning & aggregation services for the digital humanities (a position paper). D-Lib Mag. 20(7/8) (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Özsu, M.T.: A survey of RDF data management systems. Front. Comput. Sci. 10(3), 418–432 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poggi, A., Lembo, D., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Linking data to ontologies. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics X. LNCS, vol. 4900, pp. 133–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-77688-8_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quilitz, B., Leser, U.: Querying distributed RDF data sources with SPARQL. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 524–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saleem, M., Khan, Y., Hasnain, A., Ermilov, I., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C.: A fine-grained evaluation of SPARQL endpoint federation systems. Semant. Web 7, 493–518 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saleem, M., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C.: HiBISCuS: hypergraph-based source selection for SPARQL endpoint federation. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 176–191. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwarte, A., Haase, P., Hose, K., Schenkel, R., Schmidt, M.: FedX: optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 601–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25073-6_38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weikum, G., Hoffart, J., Suchanek, F.M.: Ten years of knowledge harvesting: lessons and challenges. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 39(3), 41–50 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béatrice Markhoff
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thanh Binh Nguyen
    • 2
  • Cheikh Niang
    • 3
  1. 1.Université Francois Rabelais de Tours, Laboratoire d’InformatiqueToursFrance
  2. 2.Université d’Orléans, INSA CVL, LIFOOrléansFrance
  3. 3.Agence Universitaire de la FrancophonieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations