Skip to main content

Fusion of Clinical Data: A Case Study to Predict the Type of Treatment of Bone Fractures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Trends in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 767))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clinical data is characterized not only by its constantly increasing volume but also by its diversity. Information collected in clinical information systems such as electronic health records is highly heterogeneous and it includes structured laboratory and examination reports, unstructured clinical notes, images, and more often genetic data. This heterogeneity poses a significant challenge when constructing diagnostic and therapeutic decision models that should use data from all available sources to provide a comprehensive support. A possible response to this challenge is offered by the concept of data fusion and associated techniques. In this paper, we briefly describe the foundations of data fusion and present its application in a case study aimed at building a decision model to predict the type of treatment for patients with bone fractures. Specifically, the model should distinguish between patients who should undergo a surgery and those who should be treated non-surgically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mitchell, H.B.: Data Fusion: Concepts and Ideas. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27222-6

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lahat, D., Adali, T., Jutten, C.: Multimodal data fusion: an overview of methods, challenges, and prospects. Proc. IEEE 103(9), 1449–1477 (2015). doi:10.1109/JPROC.2015.2460697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castebedo, F.: A review of data fusion techniques. Sci. World J. (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/704504

  4. Rohlfing, T., Pfefferbaum, A., Sullivan, E.V., Maurer, C.R.: Information fusion in biomedical image analysis: combination of data vs. combination of interpretations. In: Christensen, G.E., Sonka, M. (eds.) IPMI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3565, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11505730_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponti Jr., M.P: Combining classifiers: from the creation of ensembles to the decision fusion. In: 24th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images Tutorials (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, G., Madabhushi, A.: A knowledge representation framework for integration, classification of multi-scale imaging and non-imaging data: preliminary results in predicting prostate cancer recurrence by fusing mass spectrometry and histology. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Twiss, T.: Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures. In: Crosby, L.A., Neviaser, R.J. (eds.) Proximal Humerus Fractures. LNCS, pp. 23–41. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08951-5_2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lanckriet, G., Deng, M., Cristianini, N., Jordan, M., Noble, W.: Kernel-based data fusion and its application to protein function prediction in yeast. In: Proceedings of Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kourou, K., Exarchos, T.P., Exarchos, K.P., Karamouzis, M.V., Fotiadis, D.I.: Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2015). doi:10.1109/SIBGRAPI-T.2011.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jesneck, J., Nolte, L., Baker, J., Floyd, C., Lo, J.: Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis. Med. Phys. 33, 2945–2954 (2006). doi:10.1118/1.2208934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zorluoglu, G.M.: Diagnosis of breast cancer using ensemble of data mining classification methods. Int. J. Bioinform Biomed. Eng. 1(3), 318–322 (2015). doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.dmsct.4

  12. Hossain, M., Neelapala, V., Andrew, J.G.: Results of non-operative treatment following hip fracture compared to surgical intervention. Int. J. Care Inj. 40, 418–421 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Myint, S., Khaing, A.S., Tun, H.M.: Detecting leg bone fracture in x-ray images. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 5, 140–144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilk, S., Stefanowski, J., Wojciechowski, S., Farion, K.J., Michalowski, W.: Application of preprocessing methods to imbalanced clinical data: an experimental study. In: Piętka, E., Badura, P., Kawa, J., Wieclawek, W. (eds.) Information Technologies in Medicine. AISC, vol. 471, pp. 503–515. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39796-2_41

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kubat, M., Matwin, S.: Addresing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-side selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, ICML 1997, pp. 179–186 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tiwari, P., Viswanath, S., Lee, G., Madabhushi, A.: Multi-model data fusion schemes for integrated classification of imaging and non-imaging biomedical data. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. IEEE (2011). doi:10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872379

Download references

Acknowledgement

The second author would like to acknowledge support by the Polish National Science Center under Grant No. DEC-2013/11/B/ST6/00963.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anam Haq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haq, A., Wilk, S. (2017). Fusion of Clinical Data: A Case Study to Predict the Type of Treatment of Bone Fractures. In: Kirikova, M., et al. New Trends in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 767. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67161-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67162-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics