Skip to main content

Psychological Distance and Response to Human Versus Non-Human Victims of Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research

Abstract

Despite the serious threat of climate change to sustainability, people in the United States feel little urgency to address the issue. The goal of this research project was to use psychological methods to better understand why Americans respond to climate change the way they do, and to assess strategies to spur a stronger action-oriented response. Using Construal Level Theory as a foundation, three psychological studies explored the perceived psychological distance of climate change, empathy toward victims of climate change, and people’s willingness to take action. Past research suggests that perceptions of low psychological distance toward climate change are associated with higher concern and willingness to take action. In the current research, participants read short scenarios about climate change and how it impacts specific victims, such as geographically and socially similar people (low psychological distance) or a geographically and socially dissimilar social agent such as an animal (high psychological distance). Using both self-report surveys and implicit methods, our studies examined the relationship between psychological distance and response to climate change. Consistent with other research, we found that psychologically closer framings of climate change do not always effectively ameliorate psychological distance, nor result in greater intention to act. Our results further suggest that people may engage in psychological distancing when faced with climate change suffering. These findings provide important insights for effective communication about challenging sustainability issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609–622. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer, J. (2007). The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 269–283. doi:10.1177/0013916506292937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2016). “Proximizing” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 125–142. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2009). The biological basis of empathy. In J. T. Cacioppo & G. G. Bernston (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattig, A., & Hendrickx, L. (2007). Judgmental discounting and environmental risk perception: Dimensional similarities, domain differences, and implications for sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1, 21–39. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00494.x.

  • Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1301–1307. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2016). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis. doi:10.1111/risa.12601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2010). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1433–1442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Smith, N. (2011). Global Warming’s Six Americas, May 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviston, Z., Price, J., & Bishop, B. (2014). Imagining climate change: The role of implicit associations and affective psychological distancing in climate change responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 441–454. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., & Schuldt, J. (2016). Compassion for climate change victims and support for mitigation policy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., et al. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Uncertainty and Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation, 17(1), 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. H. García-Cadena, & M. Frías-Arment (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-Go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19(6), 625–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2013). Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45, 155–169. doi:10.1177/0013916511417618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2011). Personally relevant climate change. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. doi:10.1177/0013916511421196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103–120. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christie Manning .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manning, C. et al. (2018). Psychological Distance and Response to Human Versus Non-Human Victims of Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics