Blockchain for Good? Digital Ledger Technology and Sustainable Development Goals

Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Blockchain technology (aka Distributed Ledger Technology or DLT) is a novel configuration of Peer-to-Peer, cryptographic and distributed computing technologies that have the potential to shift the internet from an internet of information to an internet of value network, with significant disruptive potential. To date, the cryptocurrency ‘bitcoin’ is the application of DLT that has attracted most attention, not all of it favourable. However, DLTs are about much more than cryptocurrencies and, as Kranzberg’s (1986) first law of technology, that ‘Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral’ reminds us, we can ethically frame applications of new technologies. To date, research has tended to focus on the technical characteristics of DLTs, and there has been little reflection on potential socially and environmentally beneficial use cases: Blockchain for Good (B4G). The aim of this this exploratory and descriptive paper is to reflect on innovative B4G applications that could help deliver socially and environmentally beneficial outcomes, framed in terms of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, through challenging existing business models and providing new opportunities for value creation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of a BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grant (SG160335) in the preparation of this work.

References

  1. Adams, R., Parry, G., Godsiff, P., & Ward, P. (2017). Editorial: The future of money and further applications of the blockchain. Strategic change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance.Google Scholar
  2. Ajana, B. (2010). Recombinant identities: Biometrics and narrative bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 7, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alejandro, J. (2016). Blockchain for good—A beginner’s guide. http://tech.newstatesman.com/guest-opinion/blockchain-for-good-beginners-guide. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
  4. Ali, R., Barrdear, J., Clews, R., & Southgate, J. (2014). Innovations in payment technologies and the emergence of digital currencies. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(3), 262–275.Google Scholar
  5. Aste, T. (2016). The fair cost of bitcoin proof of work. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2801048 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2801048. Accessed 26 Feb 2017.
  6. Athey, S. (2015). 5 Ways digital currencies will change the world. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/01/5-ways-digital-currencies-will-change-the-world/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
  7. Bheemaiah, K. (2015). Why business schools need to teach about the blockchain. Available at SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2596465.
  8. Birch, D. (2014). Identity is the new money. London Publishing Partnership.Google Scholar
  9. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  10. Bradbury, D. (2013). Colored coins paint sophisticated future for Bitcoin. http://www.coindesk.com/colored-coins-paint-sophisticated-future-for-bitcoin/.
  11. Buterin, V. (2014). DAOs, DACs, DAS and more: An incomplete terminology guide.Google Scholar
  12. Casalotti, A. (2016). Global carbon trading on the blockchain. Bitcoin and blockchain leadership forum.Google Scholar
  13. CPTM. (2016). Commonwealth partnership for technology management (CPTM) brief on “Adaptive flexibility approaches to financial inclusion in a digital age: Recommendations and proposals”. London: CPTM Smart Partners’ Hub.Google Scholar
  14. Currion, P. (2015). AidCoin: A revolution in humanitarian financing. https://medium.com/@paulcurrion/introduction-513f86ed92df#.ebhmrftlz. Medium.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.
  15. Dahan, M., & Gelb, A. (2015). The role of identification in the post-2015 development agenda. World Bank Working Paper 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2016). Economics of blockchain. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2744751.
  17. De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dierksmeier, C., & Seele, P. (2016). Cryptocurrencies and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14.Google Scholar
  19. Doguet, J. (2013). The nature of the form: Legal and regulatory issues surrounding Bitcoin digital currency system. Louisiana Law Review, 73(4), 1118–1153.Google Scholar
  20. Fish, J. N., & Priest, J. B. (2011). Identity structures: Holons, boundaries, hierarchies, and the formation of the collaborative identity. The Family Journal, 19, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox-Brewster, T. (2015). How hackers abused tor to rob blockchain, steal bitcoin, target private email and get away with it. Forbes, 24(2), 7.Google Scholar
  22. Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson, J. J. (1978). The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo, 11, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenspan, G. (2015). MultiChain private blockchain—White paper. http://www.multichain.com/white-paper/. Multichain.
  25. Halford, R. (2014). Gridcoin—Crypto-currency using Berkeley open infrastructure network computing grid as a proof of work. http://www.gridcoin.us/images/gridcoin-white-paper.pdf.
  26. Helbing, D. (2013). Economics 2.0: The natural step towards a self-regulating, participatory market society. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 10, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helbing, D. (2014). Qualified money-a better financial system for the future. Available at SSRN 2526022.Google Scholar
  28. Huckle, S., Bhattacharya, R., White, M., & Beloff, N. (2016). Internet of things, blockchain and shared economy applications. Procedia Computer Science, 98, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005). General purpose technologies. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 1181–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koestler, A. (1968). The ghost in the machine. Oxford, England: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history:” Kranzberg’s laws”. Technology and Culture, 27, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krugman, P. R. (2013). Bitcoin is evil. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/?_r=1. New York Times. Accessed 26 Apr 2016.
  33. Lemieux, P. (2013) Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Regulation, Fall 36, 14–15.Google Scholar
  34. Majchrzak, A., & Markus, L. (2012). Technology affordances and constraint theory of MIS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Malhotra, A., & Van Alstyne, M. (2014). The dark side of the sharing economy… and how to lighten it. Communications of the ACM, 57, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mattila, J. (2016). The blockchain phenomenon: The disruptive potential of distributed consensus architectures. http://brie.berkeley.edu/BRIE/. Berkeley roundtable on the international economy (BRIE). Berkeley: University of California.
  38. McWaters, R., Galaski, R., & Chaterjee, S. (2016). The future of financial infrastructure: An ambitious look at how blockchain can reshape financial services: World economic forum.Google Scholar
  39. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted, 1, 28.Google Scholar
  40. ODI. (2016). Applying blockchain technology in global data infrastructure. http://theodi.org/technical-report-blockchain-technology-in-global-data-infrastructure. Open Data Institute.
  41. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices for distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Potts, J., Davidson, S., & De Filippi, P. (2016). Disrupting governance: The new institutional economics of distributed ledger technology. Available at SSRN.Google Scholar
  43. Price, R. (2016). Digital currency ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $ 50 million hack. Business Insider, 17 June, 2016.Google Scholar
  44. Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reber, D., & Feuerstein, S. (2014). Bitcoins-hype or real alternative? Internet Economics VIII, 81.Google Scholar
  46. Rizzo, P. (2016). Sweden tests blockchain smart contracts for land registry. CoinDesk, June 16, 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Russell, S. V., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence: An open letter. A association for the advancement of artificial intelligence.Google Scholar
  48. Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy, New York. www.rosalux-nyc.org. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
  49. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Seidel, S., Recker, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2013). Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: Functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quarterly, 37, 1275–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shin, L. (2016). Republic of georgia to develop blockchain land registry system. Forbes, 21 April.Google Scholar
  52. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Taghiyeva, M., Mellish B, & Ta’eed, O. (2016). Currency of intangible non-financial value. https://github.com/seratio/whitepaper. IoV blockchain alliance for good (www.bisgit.org).
  54. Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L. G., & Hecht, B. (2015). Avoiding the south side and the suburbs: The geography of mobile crowdsourcing markets. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 2015. 265–275.Google Scholar
  55. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2007). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. Evidence for policy and practice information and co-ordinating (EPPI-) centre, social science research unit. London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.Google Scholar
  56. UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
  57. UN Millennium Project. (2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. New York: United Nations and Earthscan.Google Scholar
  58. Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37, 819–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walport, M. (2016). Distributed ledger technology: Beyond block chain. A report by the UK government chief scientific adviser. Government office for science.Google Scholar
  60. WCED. (1987). Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Welch, A. (2015). The bitcoin blockchain as financial market infrastructure: A consideration of operational risk. Legislation and Public Policy, 18, 837–893.Google Scholar
  62. Wright, A., & De Filippi. P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664.Google Scholar
  63. Zuberi M, & Levin, R. (2016). Schumpeter’s revenge: The gale of creative destruction. Banking and Financial Services Policy Report, 35(5).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surrey Centre for the Digital EconomyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Strategy and Operations Management, Faculty of Business & LawUWE Frenchay CampusBristolUK

Personalised recommendations