Integrating Social Science Research to Advance Sustainability Education

  • Christine Jie Li
  • Martha C. Monroe
  • Tracey Ritchie
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

The development and evaluation of the instructional module, Southeastern Forests and Climate Change, provided a platform to conduct social science research that has the capacity to improve sustainability education and our ability to achieve target outcomes. In addition to conveying information about climate change and forest management to secondary science students, the module was designed to empower learners to take action and build skills in systems thinking. We applied Hope Theory in the design of the 14 activities and measured hope among high school students who participated in the evaluation of the activities. Activities helped learners understand how others are working on climate issues, how forest owners adapt management protocols, and how individuals can contribute to solutions—all of which help nurture hopefulness and efficacy. We also focused on developing systems thinking skills by providing opportunities for students to learn and practice common systems tools, such as causal loop diagrams. High school students (n = 924) from 24 schools in the southeastern United States completed pre-and post-activity surveys that assessed knowledge, hope, and systems thinking skills. Data suggest that there was a significant increase in hope concerning climate change, and a significant increase in systems thinking skills after some activities. Knowledge of forest management, carbon cycle, the role of forests in mitigating climate change, life cycle assessment, and product externalities also significantly increased. In this article, we describe the principles used to design the activities, the results, and the implications of this social science research.

Keywords

Climate change Hope Systems thinking skills Curriculum development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project (PINEMAP), a Coordinated Agricultural Project funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award #2011-68002-30185, and the School of Forest Resources and Conservation at the University of Florida

References

  1. Averill, J. R., Catlin, G., & Chon, K. K. (1990). Rules of hope. New York: Springs-Verlan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (eds.). (1995) Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bofferding, L., & Kloser, M. (2015). Middle and high school students’ conceptions of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruininks, P., & Malle, B. F. (2005). Distinguishing hope from optimism and related affective states. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, L., Hanson, K., Maltby, J., Proctor, C., & Wood, A. (2010). Hope uniquely predicts objective academic achievement above intelligence, personality, and previous academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. (1997). The motivation to think in working and learning. In E. Jones (Ed.), Preparing competent college graduates: Setting new and higher expectations for student learning (pp. 67–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Farran, C. J., Herth, K. A., & Popovich, J. M. (1995). Hope and hopelessness: Critical, clinical, constructs. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. (Eds)]. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor SK, Allen J, Boschung A, Nausels Y, Xia V, Bex PM, Midgley (Eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson-laird, P. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (2009). Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: The Reasonable person model as an integrative network. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 1–11.Google Scholar
  14. Lopez, S. J, Bouwkamp, J., Edwards, L. M., & Terramoto, Pedrotti J. (2000). Making hope happen via brief interventions. Paper presented at the second Positive Psychology Summit. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Li C. J., & Monroe, M. C. (2017). Development and validation of the climate change hope scale for high school students. Environ Behav.Google Scholar
  16. McGeer, V. (2004). The art of good hope. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Sciences, 592, 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monroe, M. C., Oxarart, A., & Plate, R. R. (2013). A role for environmental education in climate change for secondary science educators. Appl Envion Educ Comm, 12(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Audubon Society (NAS). (2015). Audubon’s birds and climate change report. Retrieved from http://climate.audubon.org/.
  19. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Climate change: Evidence, impacts, and choices: Answers to common questions about the science of climate change. Washington: The National Academies Press USA. Retrieved from http://nas-sites.org/americasclimatechoices/more-resources-on-climate-change/climate-change-lines-of-evidence-booklet/.
  20. National Research Council (NRC). (2011a). Climate stabilization targets: Emissions, concentrations, and impacts for decades to millennia. Washington: The National Academies Press USA.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council (NRC). (2011b). Informing an effective response to climate change. Washington: The National Academies Press USA.Google Scholar
  22. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, By states. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  23. Norman, D. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (eds.), Mental models (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N. J., pp 6−14).Google Scholar
  24. Ojala, M. (2007). Hope and worry: Exploring young people’s values, emotions, and behavior regarding global environmental problems, Örebro Studies in Psychology 11. PHD dissertation, Örebro UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson, P. L., Swing, S. R., Braverman, M. T., & Buss, R. (1982). Students’ aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pettit, P. (2004). Hope and its place in mind. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Sciences, 592, 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandri, O. J. (2013). Threshold concepts, systems and learning for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 810–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22(2), 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (Eds.). (2015). Sustainability Frontiers: Critical and transformative voices from the borderlands of sustainability education. Germany: Budrich.Google Scholar
  31. Senge, P., & Sterman, J. (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shepardson, D. P., Roychoudhury, A., Hirsch, A., Niyogi, D., & Top, S. M. (2014). When the atmosphere warms it rains and ice melts: Seventh grade students’ conceptions of a climate system. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skaza, H., Crippen, K. J., & Carroll, K. R. (2013). Teachers’ barriers to introducing system dynamics in K-12 STEM curriculum. System Dynamics Review, 29(3), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams, V. H., III, & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stave, K., & Hopper, M. (2007). What constitutes systems thinking? A proposed taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference of the system dynamics society. Athens.Google Scholar
  37. Stotland, E. (1969). The psychology of hope. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). 2013 Population estimates. Retrieved from. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/index.html.
  39. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. (2013). Timber Product Output (TPO) Reports. Knoxville, TN: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. http://srsfia2.fs.fed.us/php/tpo_2009/tpo_rpa_int1.php. [May, 2013].
  40. U.S. Global Climate Research Program. (2009). Global climate change impacts in the U.S. Washington: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Uzzell, D. (1999). Education for environmental action in the community: New roles and relationships. Cambridge journal of education, 29(3), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Jie Li
    • 1
  • Martha C. Monroe
    • 2
  • Tracey Ritchie
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations