Skip to main content

Innovative Instructional Module Uses Evaluation to Enhance Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

  • 2040 Accesses

Abstract

The instructional module, Southeastern Forests and Climate Change, is an example of innovation in sustainability education. The module was designed for high school science teachers and developed as part of a research project on southern pine productivity in a changing climate. As a result, it combines climate science with pine ecophysiology and economic productivity. It also encourages classroom debate and role playing activities to explore relevant ethical issues. It deftly brings together science education and education for sustainability. The process of developing the instructional module utilized a needs assessment, experimentation, and evaluation which improved program quality. The summative evaluation provided insights about the success of the program. This tight coupling of evaluation and program development created a high quality product that educators are requesting and using.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Disinger, J. (2001). K-12 education and the environment: Perspectives, expectations, and practice. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2010). ESD pedagogy: A guide for the perplexed. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. K., & Stuen, C. J. (1998). The interdisciplinary curriculum. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, J. A., Monroe, M. C., & Simmons, B. (2009). evaluating your environmental education programs: A workbook for practitioners. Washington DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J., Marrett, C., Suresh, S. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education 5-year strategic plan. National Science and Technology Council: Committee on STEM Education. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.

  • Ireland, J., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Should we use wood for energy? An education for sustainable development case study. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 14(2), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2012). Debating education for sustainable development 20 years after Rio. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2006). A Platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): The turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Monroe, M. C. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of materials on climate change and forests. PINEMAP Research Summary. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. http://www.pinemap.org/publications/research-summaries/education/formative%20eva%20summary_final.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.

  • McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE does not equal ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. S., Redman, C.L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art46/. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.

  • Monroe, M. C. (2012). The co-evolution of ESD and EE. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, M. C., Oxarart, A., & Plate, R. (2013). A role for environmental education in climate change for secondary science educators. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 12(1), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, M. C., Hall, S., & Li, C. J. (2016). Can climate change enhance biology lessons? A quasi-experiment. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, W. H. (1992). Academic Disciplines and Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Education: Lessons from the School of Interdisciplinary Studies at Miami University, Ohio. European Journal of Education, 27(3), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvé, L., & Berryman, T. (2005). Challenging a “closing circle”: Alternative research agendas for the ESD decade. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 4(3), 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, W. B., & Cox, D. A. (1974). Environmental education activities manual. Dexter, MI: Thomson-Shore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the graduate students, teachers, and advisors who helped develop this instructional resource, particularly Stephanie Hall, Kristen Kunkle, and Richard Plate. We also thank our colleagues in the PINEMAP project, especially the PI, Tim Martin. This work was supported by the Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project which is a Coordinated Agricultural Project funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award #2011-68002-30185.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha C. Monroe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monroe, M.C., Oxarart, A., Ritchie, T., Li, C.J. (2018). Innovative Instructional Module Uses Evaluation to Enhance Quality. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics