Abstract
The instructional module, Southeastern Forests and Climate Change, is an example of innovation in sustainability education. The module was designed for high school science teachers and developed as part of a research project on southern pine productivity in a changing climate. As a result, it combines climate science with pine ecophysiology and economic productivity. It also encourages classroom debate and role playing activities to explore relevant ethical issues. It deftly brings together science education and education for sustainability. The process of developing the instructional module utilized a needs assessment, experimentation, and evaluation which improved program quality. The summative evaluation provided insights about the success of the program. This tight coupling of evaluation and program development created a high quality product that educators are requesting and using.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Disinger, J. (2001). K-12 education and the environment: Perspectives, expectations, and practice. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 4–11.
Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2010). ESD pedagogy: A guide for the perplexed. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(1), 43–64.
Ellis, A. K., & Stuen, C. J. (1998). The interdisciplinary curriculum. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Ernst, J. A., Monroe, M. C., & Simmons, B. (2009). evaluating your environmental education programs: A workbook for practitioners. Washington DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
Holdren, J., Marrett, C., Suresh, S. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education 5-year strategic plan. National Science and Technology Council: Committee on STEM Education. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
Ireland, J., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Should we use wood for energy? An education for sustainable development case study. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 14(2), 82–89.
Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2012). Debating education for sustainable development 20 years after Rio. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 49–57.
Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Klein, J. T. (2006). A Platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 10–18.
Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): The turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 699–717.
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043.
Li, C., Monroe, M. C. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of materials on climate change and forests. PINEMAP Research Summary. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. http://www.pinemap.org/publications/research-summaries/education/formative%20eva%20summary_final.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.
McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE does not equal ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 117–128.
Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. S., Redman, C.L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art46/. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
Monroe, M. C. (2012). The co-evolution of ESD and EE. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 43–47.
Monroe, M. C., Oxarart, A., & Plate, R. (2013). A role for environmental education in climate change for secondary science educators. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 12(1), 4–18.
Monroe, M. C., Hall, S., & Li, C. J. (2016). Can climate change enhance biology lessons? A quasi-experiment. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(2), 125–137.
Newell, W. H. (1992). Academic Disciplines and Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Education: Lessons from the School of Interdisciplinary Studies at Miami University, Ohio. European Journal of Education, 27(3), 211–221.
Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington DC: Island Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sauvé, L., & Berryman, T. (2005). Challenging a “closing circle”: Alternative research agendas for the ESD decade. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 4(3), 229–232.
Stapp, W. B., & Cox, D. A. (1974). Environmental education activities manual. Dexter, MI: Thomson-Shore.
Acknowledgements
We thank the graduate students, teachers, and advisors who helped develop this instructional resource, particularly Stephanie Hall, Kristen Kunkle, and Richard Plate. We also thank our colleagues in the PINEMAP project, especially the PI, Tim Martin. This work was supported by the Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project which is a Coordinated Agricultural Project funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award #2011-68002-30185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monroe, M.C., Oxarart, A., Ritchie, T., Li, C.J. (2018). Innovative Instructional Module Uses Evaluation to Enhance Quality. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67121-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67122-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)