Abstract
Because it is a carbon-free source of electricity, wind energy is often unquestioned as an environmentally sustainable technology. But is this technology sustainable when considered within the context of the rural communities in which it is often sited? This paper uses survey data from paired rural communities with and without utility-scale wind energy projects to understand the economic and social impacts of wind energy development on these predominantly agricultural communities. It finds clear economic benefits to the communities that host wind turbines—namely, that wind developers’ payments to landowners are largely re-invested in farming operations, leading to economic stability and increasing expectations that a younger generation will want to stay on the farm. The social impacts of wind development are more nuanced, and depend upon the windfarm’s business model. Specifically, windfarms are least disruptive of the social structure in rural communities when wind developers employ a business model that gives more community members a direct financial stake in the project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the traditional wind development business model, only landowners with turbines on their property are directly compensated. An alternated “pooled royalty” business model spreads this same amount of money among all landowners who initially expressed willingness to have a turbine on their property, regardless of whether they ultimately received a turbine on their property or not, on a per-acre basis. In these pooling arrangements, the royalty share of the lease payment is diluted as it is shared among more landowners, but a higher proportion of community members receive direct payments from the wind developer.
- 2.
Many wdevelopers require leaseholders to keep lease terms confidential, but in interviews with local officials in the case study communities, the annual payments to landowners are likely less than $12,000 per turbine per year. Considering that most landowners have only one or two turbines on their property, few would be receiving $50,000 per year.
References
Adelaja, A., Sullivan, K., & Hailu, Y. G. (2011). Endogenizing the planning horizon in urban fringe agriculture. Land use policy, 28, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.002.
Alterman, R. (1997). The challenge of farmland preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation comparison. J Am Plan Assoc, 63, 220–243.
Bell, D., Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005). The “Social Gap” in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Env Polit, 14, 460–477.
Black, G., Holley, D., Solan, D., & Bergloff, M. (2014). Fiscal and economic impacts of state incentives for wind energy development in the Western United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 136–144. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.015.
Brown, J. P., Pender, J., Wiser, R., et al. (2012). Ex post analysis of economic impacts from wind power development in U.S. counties. Energy Econ, 34, 1743–1754. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.010.
D’Souza, G. E., & Gebremedhin, T. G. (1998). Sustainability in agricultural and rural development. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
Devine-Wright, P. (2005a). Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: Exploring public beliefs and policy implications. Local Environment, 10, 57–69. doi:10.1080/1354983042000309315.
Devine-Wright, P. (2005b). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8, 125–139. doi:10.1002/we.124.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., et al. (2009). Wind power: Is there a “Planning Problem”? Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception? The problems of planning—a developer’s perspective wind farms: More respectful and open debate needed, not less planning: Problem “Carrier” or proble. Plan Theory Pract, 10, 521–547.
Gallego Carrera, D., & Mack, A. (2010). Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy, 38, 1030–1039. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.055.
Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.
Hall, N., Ashworth, P., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, 58, 200–208. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009.
Kahn, M. E. (2013). Local non-market quality of life dynamics in new wind farms communities. Energy Policy, 59, 800–807. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.037.
Mulvaney, K. K., Woodson, P., & Prokopy, L. S. (2013). A tale of Three Counties: Understanding wind development in the rural Midwestern United States. Energy Policy, 56, 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.064.
Munday, M., Bristow, G., & Cowell, R. (2011). Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? J Rural Stud, 27, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.08.003.
Napier, A. (2012). Wind power: Economic growth for rural America. Washington, DC: American Wind Energy Association. http://www.aweablog.org/wind-power-economic-growth-for-rural-america/.
Pennings, J. M. E., Irwin, S. H., & Good, D. L. (2002). Surveying farmers: A case study. Rev Agric Econ, 24, 266–277.
Phimister, E., & Roberts, D. (2012). The role of ownership in determining the rural economic benefits of on-shore wind farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 331–360. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00336.x.
Salamon, S. (1992). Prarie patrimony: Family, farming, and community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294–308.
Slattery, M. C., Johnson, B. L., Swofford, J. A., & Pasqualetti, M. J. (2012). The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 3690–3701. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.016.
Slattery, M. C., Lantz, E., & Johnson, B. L. (2011). State and local economic impacts from wind energy projects: Texas case study. Energy Policy, 39, 7930–7940. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.047.
Sutherland, L.-A., & Holstead, K. L. (2014). Future-proofing the farm: On-Farm wind turbine development in farm business decision-making. Land use policy, 36, 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.004.
Swofford, J., & Slattery, M. (2010). Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy, 38, 2508–2519. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2015). Wind vision. A new era for wind power in the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2003). Farming the wind: Wind Power and Agriculture. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O’Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). “Green on Green”: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plan Manag, 48, 853–875.
Warren, C. R., & McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land use policy, 27, 204–213. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010.
Weisser, D. (2007). A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy, 32, 1543–1559. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.008.
Whitton, J., Parry, I. M., Akiyoshi, M., & Lawless, W. (2015). Conceptualizing a social sustainability framework for energy infrastructure decisions. Energy Res Soc Sci, 8, 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.010.
Wilson, G. A., & Dyke, S. L. (2016). Pre- and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects: The case of Roskrow Barton (Cornwall, UK). Land use policy, 52, 287–296. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.008.
Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of “backyard motives”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1188–1207. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mills, S. (2018). Wind Energy and Rural Community Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67121-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67122-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)