Advertisement

Wind Energy and Rural Community Sustainability

Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Because it is a carbon-free source of electricity, wind energy is often unquestioned as an environmentally sustainable technology. But is this technology sustainable when considered within the context of the rural communities in which it is often sited? This paper uses survey data from paired rural communities with and without utility-scale wind energy projects to understand the economic and social impacts of wind energy development on these predominantly agricultural communities. It finds clear economic benefits to the communities that host wind turbines—namely, that wind developers’ payments to landowners are largely re-invested in farming operations, leading to economic stability and increasing expectations that a younger generation will want to stay on the farm. The social impacts of wind development are more nuanced, and depend upon the windfarm’s business model. Specifically, windfarms are least disruptive of the social structure in rural communities when wind developers employ a business model that gives more community members a direct financial stake in the project.

Keywords

Wind energy Social impacts Rural sustainability 

References

  1. Adelaja, A., Sullivan, K., & Hailu, Y. G. (2011). Endogenizing the planning horizon in urban fringe agriculture. Land use policy, 28, 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alterman, R. (1997). The challenge of farmland preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation comparison. J Am Plan Assoc, 63, 220–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, D., Gray, T., & Haggett, C. (2005). The “Social Gap” in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Env Polit, 14, 460–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, G., Holley, D., Solan, D., & Bergloff, M. (2014). Fiscal and economic impacts of state incentives for wind energy development in the Western United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. P., Pender, J., Wiser, R., et al. (2012). Ex post analysis of economic impacts from wind power development in U.S. counties. Energy Econ, 34, 1743–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Souza, G. E., & Gebremedhin, T. G. (1998). Sustainability in agricultural and rural development. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Devine-Wright, P. (2005a). Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: Exploring public beliefs and policy implications. Local Environment, 10, 57–69. doi: 10.1080/1354983042000309315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devine-Wright, P. (2005b). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8, 125–139. doi: 10.1002/we.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, G., Cowell, R., Warren, C., et al. (2009). Wind power: Is there a “Planning Problem”? Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception? The problems of planning—a developer’s perspective wind farms: More respectful and open debate needed, not less planning: Problem “Carrier” or proble. Plan Theory Pract, 10, 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallego Carrera, D., & Mack, A. (2010). Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts. Energy Policy, 38, 1030–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall, N., Ashworth, P., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, 58, 200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahn, M. E. (2013). Local non-market quality of life dynamics in new wind farms communities. Energy Policy, 59, 800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mulvaney, K. K., Woodson, P., & Prokopy, L. S. (2013). A tale of Three Counties: Understanding wind development in the rural Midwestern United States. Energy Policy, 56, 322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Munday, M., Bristow, G., & Cowell, R. (2011). Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? J Rural Stud, 27, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Napier, A. (2012). Wind power: Economic growth for rural America. Washington, DC: American Wind Energy Association. http://www.aweablog.org/wind-power-economic-growth-for-rural-america/.
  18. Pennings, J. M. E., Irwin, S. H., & Good, D. L. (2002). Surveying farmers: A case study. Rev Agric Econ, 24, 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phimister, E., & Roberts, D. (2012). The role of ownership in determining the rural economic benefits of on-shore wind farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 331–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00336.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salamon, S. (1992). Prarie patrimony: Family, farming, and community in the Midwest. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  21. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slattery, M. C., Johnson, B. L., Swofford, J. A., & Pasqualetti, M. J. (2012). The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 3690–3701. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slattery, M. C., Lantz, E., & Johnson, B. L. (2011). State and local economic impacts from wind energy projects: Texas case study. Energy Policy, 39, 7930–7940. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sutherland, L.-A., & Holstead, K. L. (2014). Future-proofing the farm: On-Farm wind turbine development in farm business decision-making. Land use policy, 36, 102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swofford, J., & Slattery, M. (2010). Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy, 38, 2508–2519. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2015). Wind vision. A new era for wind power in the United States. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Union of Concerned Scientists. (2003). Farming the wind: Wind Power and Agriculture. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
  28. Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O’Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). “Green on Green”: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plan Manag, 48, 853–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warren, C. R., & McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land use policy, 27, 204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weisser, D. (2007). A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy, 32, 1543–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whitton, J., Parry, I. M., Akiyoshi, M., & Lawless, W. (2015). Conceptualizing a social sustainability framework for energy infrastructure decisions. Energy Res Soc Sci, 8, 127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson, G. A., & Dyke, S. L. (2016). Pre- and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects: The case of Roskrow Barton (Cornwall, UK). Land use policy, 52, 287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of “backyard motives”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 1188–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gerald R. Ford School of Public PolicyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations