Abstract
At present, the efficiency of allocating funds from public budgets is an issue that is being increasingly debated in the public sector. Mainly, this is due to increasing debt but also to changes in the way public services are provided. Good decisions regarding allocations, however, are prevented by the inability to measure output volume and the benefits for consumers provided by various services. Outcomes of public libraries are benefits of a system or service producer to its users (Vakkari and Serola, Library Inf Sci Res 34(1):37–44, 2012). Their value is more complex in the public sector than in the private sector and can therefore be harder to measure (Bloch and Bugge, Struct Chang Econ Dyn 27:133–145, 2013). This paper provides evidence that it is possible to analyse the effectiveness in the public sector—which provides library services—of both providers (libraries) and individual components of the services. This can be done through the application of a methodology that allows the consumers themselves to determine the perceived value of the services being used. The result of the analysis of these selected services’ effectiveness at the biggest Czech library is a determination of its degree of effectiveness, which fluctuates around a value of one. The next step is to further divide individual standardized services into groups by whether they are effective or ineffective. A completely unique representative survey carried out in the Czech Republic in 2012 has been used throughout the analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Aabø S (2009) Libraries and return on investment (ROI): a meta-analysis. New Libr World 110(7/8):311–324
Bach S, Kolins Givan R (2011) Varieties of new public management? The reform of public service employment relations in the UK and USA. Int J Hum Resour Manag 22(11):2349–2366
Bao G, Wang X, Larsen GL, Morgan DF (2013) Beyond new public governance: a value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Adm Soc 45(4):443–467
Bloch C, Bugge MM (2013) Public sector innovation – from theory to measurement. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 27:133–145
Brown K, Osborne SP (2012) Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge, London
Carson RT (2012) Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available. J Econ Perspect 26(4):27–42
Cummings RG, Taylor LO (1999) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am Econ Rev 89(3):649–665
Denhardt RB, Denhardt JV (2000) The new public service: serving rather than steering. Public Adm Rev 60(6):549–559
Denhardt JV, Denhardt RB (2015) The new public service revisited. Public Adm Rev 75(5):664–675
Dunleavy P, Hood C (1994) From old public administration to new public management. Public Money Manag 14(3):9–16
Fernandez S, Rainey HG (2006) Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Adm Rev 66(2):168–176
Griffiths JM, King D (1993) Special libraries: increasing the information edge. Special Libraries Association, Washington, DC
Hajek P, Stejskal J (2014) Library user behavior analysis use in economics and management. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ 11(1):107–116
Hajek P, Stejskal J (2015) Modelling public library value using the contingent valuation method: the case of the municipal library of Prague. J Librar Inf Sci 47(1):43–55
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Kaufman P, Watstein BS (2008) Library value (return on investment, ROI) and the challenge of placing a value on public services. Ref Serv Rev 36(3):226–231
Klose T (1999) The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy 47(2):97–123
Lee SJ, Chung HK (2012) Analyzing altruistic motivations in public library valuation using contingent valuation method. Libr Inf Sci Res 34(1):72–78
Lynn LE (1996) Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham House, Chatham, NJ
Marella G, Raga R (2014) Use of the contingent valuation method in the assessment of a landfill mining project. Waste Manag 34(7):1199–1205
Marshall J (1993) The impact of the special library on corporate decision-making. Special Libraries Association, Washington, DC
Mathews J (2011) What’s the return on ROI? Libr Leadersh Manag 25:1–14
McIntosh CR (2013) Library return on investment: defending the contingent valuation method for public benefits estimation. Libr Inf Sci Res 35(2):117–126
Merickova B, Stejskal J (2014) The value of collective consumption goods. Politicka ekonomie 62(2):216–231
Missingham R (2005) Libraries and economic value: a review of recent studies. Perform Meas Metrics 6(3):142–158
Modell S, Wiesel F (2008) Marketization and performance measurement in Swedish central government: a comparative institutionalist study. Abacus 44(3):251–283
OECD (1996) Performance auditing and the modernisation of government. OECD, Paris
Osborne D, Plastrik P (1997) Banishing bureaucracy. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA
Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Verschuere B (eds) (2013) New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. Routledge, London
Peters BG, Savoie D (1996) Managing incoherence: the coordination and empowerment conundrum. Public Adm Rev 56(3):281–289
Russell S, Fox-Rushby J, Arhin D (1995) Willingness and ability to pay for health care: a selection of methods and issues. Health Policy Plan 10:94–101
Sanderson I (1996) Evaluation, learning and the effectiveness of public services: towards a quality of public service model. Int J Public Sect Manag 9(5/6):90–108
Slater R, Aiken M (2014) Can’t you count? Public service delivery and standardized measurement challenges–the case of community composting. Public Manag Rev 17(8):1085–1102
Stejskal J, Hajek P (2015) Evaluating the economic value of a public service—the case of the municipal library of Prague. Public Money Manag 35(2):145–152
Venkatachalam L (2004) The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24(1):89–124
Walsh V, Greenshields S (1998) The value of libraries and library professionals to Australia’s top 100 companies: draft report of the study conducted by the Australian library and information association. Aust Libr J 31(3):59–101
Wedgwood A, Sansom K (2003) Willingness-to-pay survey–a streamlined approach: guidance notes for small town water services. WEDC, Loughborough University, Leicestershire
Wilson A, Pitman L (1999a) Guidelines for the application of best practice in Australian university libraries: intranational and international benchmarks. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra
Wilson A, Pitman L (1999b) Best practice handbook for Australian university libraries. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the anonymous reviewer whose comments and suggestions helped to significantly improve the quality of the resulting paper. This work was also supported by a grant provided by Student Grant Competition of the University of Pardubice in year 2015 (no. SGSFES_2015003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pichova, S., Stejskal, J. (2018). The Perceived Value of Public Services as a Prerequisite for a Comprehensive Analysis of the Effectiveness of Public Sector Organizations Using the Czech Library as an Example. In: Dias, A., Salmelin, B., Pereira, D., Dias, M. (eds) Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67100-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67101-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)