Skip to main content

Post Mortem Anthropology and Trauma Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
P5 Medicine and Justice

Abstract

Skeletal trauma remains one of the most challenging issues in forensic anthropology. Whether one is looking at skeletal remains or even well preserved cadavers, forensic anthropology and osteology may be the key disciplines by which to define the weapon used to produce a lesion or date a bone callus. If we omit radiology, which is a forensic discipline per se, the tools with which novel research is being performed are still macroscopic and stereoscopic observation, decalcified and non-decalcified thin section microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy with edx. The following paragraphs represent a brief summary of these events and the status quo, with particular focus on timing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brighton CT, Hunt RM (1991) Early histological and ultra structural changes in medullary fracture callus. J Bone Jt Surg 73(6):832–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Bolander ME, Crusess RL (1996) Healing of musculoskeletal tissue. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Fracture in adults, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 267–283

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pechníková M, Mazzarelli D, Poppa P, Gibelli D, Scossa Baggi E, Cattaneo C (2015) Microscopic pattern of bone fractures as an indicator of blast trauma: a pilot study. J Forensic Sci 60(5):1140–1145. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Porta D, Amadasi A, Cappella A, Mazzarelli D, Magli F, Gibelli D, Rizzi A, Picozzi M, Gentilomo A, Cattaneo C (2016) Dismemberment and disarticulation: a forensic anthropological approach. J Forensic Legal Med 38:50–57. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. William PL, Warwick R, Dyson M et al (1989) Gray’s anatomy. In: The response of bone to injury, 37th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 313–315

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shipman P (1981) Applications of scanning electron microscopy to taphonomic problems. Ann NY Acad Sci 276:357–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pechnikova M, Porta D, Mazzarelli D, Rizzi A, Drozdova E, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C (2012) Detection of metal residues on bone using SEM-EDS. Part I: blunt force injury. Forensic Sci Int 223:87–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amadasi A, Gibelli D, Mazzarelli D, Porta D, Gaudio D, Salsarola D, Brandone A, Rizzi A, Cattaneo C (2015) Assets and pitfalls of chemical and microscopic analysis on gunshot residues in skeletonized bodies: a report of five cases. Int J Leg Med 129(4):819–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amadasi A, Borgonovo S, Brandone A, Di Giancamillo M, Cattaneo C (2014) A comparison between digital radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance in the detection of gunshot residues in burnt tissues and bone. J Forensic Sci 59(3):712–717. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibelli D, Mazzarelli D, Porta D, Rizzi A, Cattaneo C (2012) Detection of metal residues on bone using SEM-EDS-Part II: sharp force injury. Forensic Sci Int 223:91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amadasi A, Borgonovo S, Brandone A, Di Giancamillo M, Cattaneo C (2012) The survival of metallic residues from gunshot wounds in cremated bone: a radiological study. Int J Legal Med 126(3):363–369. doi:10.1007/s00414-011-0633-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amadasi A, Gibelli D, Mazzarelli D, Porta D, Gaudio D, Salsarola D, Brandone A, Rizzi A, Cattaneo C (2015) Assets and pitfalls of chemical and microscopic analyses on gunshot residues in skeletonized bodies: a report of five cases. Int J Legal Med 129(4):819–824. doi:10.1007/s00414-014-1107-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amadasi A, Brandone A, Rizzi A, Mazzarelli D, Cattaneo C (2012) The survival of metallic residues from gunshot wounds in cremated bone: a SEM-EDX study. Int J Legal Med 126:525–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berryman HE, Kutyla AK, Russell DJ (2010) Detection of gunshot primer residues on bone in an experimental setting-an unexpected finding. J Forensic Sci 55:488–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vermeij EJ, Zoon PD, Chang SB, Keereweer I, Pieterman R, Gerretsen RR (2012) Analysis of microtraces in invasive traumas using SEM/EDS. Forensic Sci Int 214:96–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taborelli A, Gibelli D, Rizzi A, Andreola S, Brandone A, Cattaneo C (2012) Gunshot residues on dry bone after decomposition: a pilot study. J Forensic Sci 57:1281–1284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Doblaré M, Garcıa JM, Gómez MJ (2004) Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng Fract Mech 71(13):1809–1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodan GA (1992) Introduction to bone biology. Bone 13(1):S3–S6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Erlebacher A, Filvaroff EH, Gitelman SE, Derynck R (1995) Toward a molecular understanding of skeletal development. Cell 80:371–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitriou R, Tsiridis E, Giannoudis PV (2005) Current concepts of molecular aspects of bone healing. Inj Int J Care Inj 36:1392–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prosser I, Maguire S, Harrison SK, Mann M, Sibert JR, Kemp AM (2005) How old is this fracture? Radiologic dating of fractures in children: a systematic review. Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1282–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hendrix RW (2002) Fracture Healing. In: Rogers LF (ed) Radiology of skeletal trauma, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 203–230

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hufnagl K (2005) An Investigation of time since injury: a radiographic study of fracture healing. A Thesis. http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07082005-102907/unrestricted/Hufnagl_thesis.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2016

  24. Einhorn TA (1998) The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin Orthop 35(5S):7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heppenstall RB (1980) Fracture healing. In: Heppenstall RB (ed) Fracture treatment and healing. Saunders, pp 41–64

    Google Scholar 

  26. Collins DH (1966) Pathology of bone. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frost MD (1989) The biology of fracture healing. An overview for Clinicians. Part 1. Clin Orthoped Relat Res 248:283–923

    Google Scholar 

  28. Toal RL, Mitchell SK (2002) Fracture healing and complications. In: Thrall DE (ed) Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology, 4th edn. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia p, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  29. Todd TW, Iler DH (1927) The phenomena of early stages in bone repair. Ann Surg 86(5):715–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Philips AM (2005) Overview of the fracture healing cascade. Inj Int J Care Inj 36:s5–s7

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vigorita VJ (2009) Orthopedic pathology. Lippincott-Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Barbian LT, Sledzik PS (2008) Healing following cranial trauma. J Forensic Sci 53(2):263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maat GJR (2008) Dating of fractures in human dry bone tissue. The Berisha case. In: Kimmerle E, Baraybar JP (eds) Identification of traumatic skeletal injuries resulting from human rights abuses and armed conflicts. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp 245–254

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maat GJR, Huls N (2010) Histological fracture dating on fresh and dried bone tissue. In: Bilo RAC, Robben SGF, van RiJn RR (eds) Forensic aspects of pediatric fractures. Differentiating accidental trauma from child abuse. Springer, Berlin, pp 194–201

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Boer HH, van der Merwe AE, Hammer S, Steyn M, Maat GJR (2012) Assessing post-traumatic time interval in human dry bone. Int J Osteoarchaeology. doi:10.1002/oa.2267

    Google Scholar 

  36. Steyn M, De Boer HH, van der Merwe AE (2014) Cranial trauma and the assessment of posttraumatic survival time. Forensic Sci Int 244:e25–e29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ortner D (2008) Differential diagnosis of skeletal injuries. In: Kimmerle EH, Baraybar JP (eds) Skeletal trauma: identification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 21–93

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ubelaker DH (1997) Taphonomic applications in forensic anthropology. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH (eds) Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 77–90

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sauer N (1998) The timing of injuries and manner of death: distinguishing among antemortem, perimortem and postmortem trauma. In: Reichs K (ed) Forensic osteology, advances in the identification of human remains, 2nd edn. Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wieberg DAM, Wescott DJ (2008) Estimating the timing of long bone fractures: correlation between the postmortem interval, bone moisture content, and blunt force trauma characteristics. J Forensic Sci 53(5):1028–1034

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Evans FG (1957) Stress and strain in bones. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  42. Galloway A (1999) The biomechanics of fracture production. In: Galloway A (ed) Broken bones: anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 117–118

    Google Scholar 

  43. Johnson E (1985) Current developments in bone technology. Adv Archaeol Method Theor 8:157–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, Symes SA (2008) New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 51:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moraitis K, Eliopoulos C, Spiliopoulou C (2009) Fracture characteristics of perimortem trauma in skeletal material. Internet J Biol Anthropol 3(2):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  46. Symes SA, L’abbé EN, Stull KE, Lacroix M, Pokines JT (2014) Taphonomy and the timing of bone fractures in trauma analysis. In: Pokines JT, Symes SA (eds) Manual of forensic taphonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton pp 341–365

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ubelaker DH (1991) Perimortem and postmortem modification of human bone. Lessons from forensic anthropology. Antropologie 29:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  48. Galloway A, Symes SA, Haglund WD et al (1999) The role of forensic anthropology in trauma analysis. In: Galloway A (ed) Broken bones: anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 5–31

    Google Scholar 

  49. Karr LP, Outram AK (2012) Tracking changes in bone fracture morphology over time: environment, taphonomy, and the archaeological record. J Archaeol Sci 39(2):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ubelaker DH, Adams BJ (1995) Differentiation of perimortem and postmortem trauma using taphonomic indicators. J Forensic Sci 40(3):509–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Villa P, Mahieu E (1991) Breakage patterns of human long bones. J Hum Evol 21:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quatrehomme G, Alunni V (2013) Bone trauma. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic science, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science and Technology, Amsterdam, pp 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  53. Morlan RE (1984) Toward the definition of criteria for the recognition of artificial bone alterations. Quatern Res 22:160–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Cappella A, Amadasi A, Castoldi E, Mazzarelli D, Gaudio D, Cattaneo C (2014) The difficult task of assessing perimortem and post-mortem fractures on the skeleton: a blind test on 210 fractures of known origin. J Forensic Sci 59:1598–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cappella A, Castoldi E, Sforza C, Cattaneo C (2014) An osteological revisitation of autopsies: comparing anthropological findings in exhumed skeletons to their respective autopsy reports in seven cases. Forensic Sci Int 244:315.e1–315.e10. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.09.003

  56. Cattaneo C, Andreola S, Marinelli E, Poppa P, Porta D, Grandi M (2010) The detection of microscopic markers of hemorrhaging and wound age on dry bone. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 31(1):22–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cappella A, Bertoglio B, Castoldi E,  Maderna E, Di Giancamillo A, Domeneghini C, Andreola S, Cattaneo C (2015) The taphonomy of blood components in decomposing bone and its relevance to physical anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 158(4):636–645

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Cattaneo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cattaneo, C., Cappella, A., Cunha, E. (2017). Post Mortem Anthropology and Trauma Analysis. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics