Abstract
The concept of “Personalization” developed in medicine allows attention to be focused on the individual with respect to the diagnosed disease; this change has made a multidisciplinary synergy possible that characterizes scientific research. The same concept is, however, difficult to apply to Justice, where the subject of personalization is not clear and unambiguous as in the medical field, even though the possibility of adapting the general and abstract laws to concrete facts under investigation does remain.In spite of the aforementioned antithetical nature of the “Personalization—Justice” binomial, there are points of union between the latter and medicine. The first of these is represented by the individual, the focus of both disciplines; the second is the scientific evidence that allows Justice to acquire ever higher levels of reliability and validity. These levels, however, can only be reached if, as an indispensable condition, a mutual knowledge, derived from an understandable communication and a common formation, enabling the two disciplines to define themselves as complementary, is generated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tarfusser, C.J. (2017). Scientific Evidence and Proof. Towards a Personalized Justice. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67091-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67092-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)