Skip to main content

Intelligent Collective: The Role of Diversity and Collective Cardinality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10448))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays, there appears to be ample evidence that collectives can be intelligent if they satisfy diversity, independence, decentralization, and aggregation. Although many measures have been proposed to evaluate the quality of collective prediction, it seems that they may not adequately reflect the intelligence degree of a collective. It is due to the fact that they take into account either the accuracy of collective prediction; or the comparison between the capability of a collective to those of its members in solving a given problem. In this paper, we first introduce a new function that measures the intelligence degree of a collective. Following, we carry out simulation experiments to determine the impact of diversity on the intelligence degree of a collective by taking into account its cardinality. Our findings reveal that diversity plays a major role in leading a collective to be intelligent. Moreover, the simulation results also indicate a case in which the increase in the cardinality of a collective does not cause any significant increase in its intelligence degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clemen, R.T.: Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecast. 5, 559–583 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Doubleday/Anchor, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, J.S.: How to make better forecasts and decisions: avoid face-to-face meetings. Foresight Int. J. Appl. Forecast. 5, 3–8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, M.: Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Page, S.E.: The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galton, F.: Vox populi (The wisdom of crowds). Nature 75, 450–451 (1907)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graefe, A., Armstrong, J.S.: Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. Int. J. Forecast. 27, 183–195 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Springer, London (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, N.T., Sobecki, J.: Using consensus methods to construct adaptive interfaces in multimodal web-based systems. J. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2(4), 342–358 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawamura, H., Ohuchi, A.: Evolutionary emergence of collective intelligence with artificial pheromone communication. In: 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, pp. 2831–2836 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, C., Vinaimont, T.: Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 11, 724–732 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., Brenner, M.: A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance. Psychol. Bull. 55, 337 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gigone, D., Hastie, R.: Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments. Psychol. Bull. 121, 149–167 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Larrick, R.P., Soll, J.B.: Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Manag. Sci. 52, 111–127 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, V.D., Merayo, M.G.: Intelligent collective: some issues with collective cardinality. J. Inf. Telecommun. (2017). doi:10.1080/24751839.2017.1323702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, L., Page, S.E.: Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16385–16389 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Armstrong, J.S.: Combining forecasts. In: Armstrong, J.S. (ed.) Principles of Forecasting, pp. 417–439. Springer, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell, K., Mínguez-Vera, A.: Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 83, 435–451 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Robert, L., Romero, D.M.: Crowd size, diversity and performance. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1379–1382. ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelley, T.L.: The applicability of the Spearman–Brown formula for the measurement of reliability. J. Educ. Psychol. 16, 300–303 (1925)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simons, A.M.: Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 453–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner, C., Suh, A.: The wisdom of crowds: impact of collective size and expertise transfer on collective performance. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 594–603 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cui, R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A., Zhang, D.J.: The operational value of social media information. Available at SSRN (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: A method for improving the quality of collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 75–84 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: An influence analysis of the inconsistency degree on the quality of collective knowledge for objective case. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 23–32 (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen, N.T., Nguyen, V.D., Hwang, D.: An influence analysis of the number of members on the quality of knowledge in a collective. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 1217–1228 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vossen, G.: Big data as the new enabler in business and other intelligence. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 1, 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cao, S.T., Nguyen, L.A.: Query–subquery nets for Horn knowledge bases in first-order logic. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1, 79–99 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This article is based upon work from COST Action KEYSTONE IC1302, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) and partially supported by the projects DArDOS (TIN2015-65845-C3-1-R (MINECO/FEDER)) and SICOMORo-CM (S2013/ICE-3006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Van Du Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Du Nguyen, V., Merayo, M.G., Nguyen, N.T. (2017). Intelligent Collective: The Role of Diversity and Collective Cardinality. In: Nguyen, N., Papadopoulos, G., Jędrzejowicz, P., Trawiński, B., Vossen, G. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67074-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67074-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67073-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67074-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics