Skip to main content

A Cross-Cultural Corpus Study of the Use of Hedging Markers and Dogmatism in Postgraduate Writing of Native and Non-native Speakers of English

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 740))

Abstract

This study investigates the frequency of hedged propositions in academic writing, which are produced by both native (NSs) and non-native speakers (NNSs). To this end, two corpora, which represent native and non-native writings respectively, are compiled and investigated using contrastive interlanguage analysis (CIA). This computer-aided investigation, which involves comparing quantitative and qualitative data, is adopted to identify what the most frequent hedging markers, used by native and non-native writers, are, and whether there is any significant difference between the frequencies of these markers in both writings. This research is an attempt to fill a gap in literature, as there is a paucity of studies written on corpus analysis in the Middle East. The findings suggest that non-native speakers underuse hedges and the quality of these hedges is usually not so high as those of the native speakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scarcella, R., Brunak, J.: On speaking politely in a second language. Int. J. Sociol. Lang. 1981 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kasper, G.: Communication strategies: Modality reduction. Interlang. Stud. Bull. 4, 83–266 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robberecht, P., Petegham, M.: A functional model for the description of modality. In: The Fifth International Conference on Contrastive Projects (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naess, A.: Communication and Argument; Elements Of Applied Semantics. Allen and Unwin Limited, London (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skelton, J.: The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT J. 42, 37–43 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Granger, S.: Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In: Granger, S., Hung, J., Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.) Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Netherlands (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, M., Tribble, C.: Textual Patterns. J. Benjamins, Philadelphia (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Hyland, K.: Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing (Continuum discourse series). Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kopple, W.: Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. Coll. Compos. Commun. 36, 82 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tse, P., Hyland, K.: So what is the problem this book addresses? Interactions in academic book reviews. Text & Talk—An Interdiscip. J. Lang. Discourse Commun. Stud. 26, 767–790 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dictionary, h.: Hedge meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hedge

  12. Poos, D., Simpson, R.: Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In: Reppen, R., Fitzmaurice, S., Biber, D. (eds.) Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lakoff, G.: Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. J. Philos. Logic 2 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKenny, J.: A corpus-based investigation of the phraseology in various genres of written English with applications to the teaching of English for academic purposes (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Salager-Meyer, F.: Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. Engl. Specif. Purp. 13, 149–170 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murniato, M.: Types and functions of hedges used in ‘J. K. Rowling’s’ interview with Oprah Winfrey show. http://kim.ung.ac.id/index.php/KIMFSB/article/download/3287/3263

  17. Koutsantoni, D.: Developing Academic Literacies. Peter Lang, Oxford[etc.] (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quirk, R., Leech, G., Greenbaum, S., Crystal, D.: A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aijmer, K.: Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In: Granger, S., Hung, J., Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.) Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Netherlands (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hinkel, E.: The use of model verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Q. 29, 325 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Papafragou, A.: Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116, 1688–1702 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Halliday, M.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haswell, R.: Gaining Ground in College Writing. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, Tex (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wray, A.: Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Lemke, J.: Resources for attitudinal meaning: evaluative orientations in text semantics. Funct. Lang. 5, 33–56 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Corver, N., Van Riemsdijk, H.: Semi-lexical Categories: the Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words. De Gruyter Mouton, Germany (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinojosa, J., Martín-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Muñoz, F., Carretié, L., Fernández-Frías, C., Pozo, M.: Semantic processing of open- and closed-class words: an event-related potentials study. Cogn. Brain. Res. 11, 397–407 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Corver, N., Van Riemsdijk, H.: Semi-lexical Categories. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Halliday, M.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Hodder Arnold, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stubbs, M.: Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schmitt, N.: An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. Arnold, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lorenz, G.: Adjective Intensification Learners Versus Native Speakers: A Corpus Study of Argumentative Writing (Language & Computers). Rodopi, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Coventry University: British Academic Written English Corpus (BAWE). http://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/research-directories/current-projects/2015/british-academic-written-english-corpus-bawe/

  34. Ortmeier-Hooper, C.: The ELL Writer. United States, United States (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hyland, K.: Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. Engl. Specif. Purp. 13, 239–256 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Holmes, J.: Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Appl. Linguist. 9, 21–44 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kenny, A.: The Computation of Style: an Introduction to Statistics for Students of Literature and Humanities. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scott, M.: WordSmith Tools, Version 3. Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ure, J.: Lexical density and register differentiation. In: Perren, J., Trim (ed.) Applications of Linguistics: Selected Papers of the 2nd International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meunier, F.: Computer tools for the analysis of learner corpora. Presented at the (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hunston, S., Francis, G.: Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Benjamins, Amsterdam [u.a.] (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rezanejad, A., Lari, Z., Mosalli, Z.: A cross-cultural analysis of the use of hedging devices in scientific research articles. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 6, 1384 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ringbom, H.: Vocabulary frequencies in advanced learner English: a cross-linguistic approach. In: Granger, S., Leech, G. (eds.) Learner English on Computer. Longman, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Coates, J.: Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. Croom Helm, London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Henneren, L.: On Modality in English: A Study of the Semantics of the Modality. CWK Gleerup, Lund (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Halliday, M.: Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Found. Lang. 6 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Archer, D., Wilson, A., Rayson, P.: Introduction to the USAS category system. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/usas%20guide.pdf

  48. Granger, S.: In: Cowie, A. (ed.) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Channell.: Vague Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hyland, K.: Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum. System 24, 477–490 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hyland, K., Milton, J.: Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. J. Second Lang. Writ. 6, 183–205 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Johansson, M.: It-clefts and pseudo-clefts in Swedish advanced learner English. Moderna Sprak. 95, 16–23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rawy A. Thabet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thabet, R.A. (2018). A Cross-Cultural Corpus Study of the Use of Hedging Markers and Dogmatism in Postgraduate Writing of Native and Non-native Speakers of English. In: Shaalan, K., Hassanien, A., Tolba, F. (eds) Intelligent Natural Language Processing: Trends and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 740. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67056-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67056-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67055-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67056-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics