Analysis of Conflict Datasets and Indicators: The Case of the “Arab Spring”

  • Carlos M. Lemos
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)


This chapter contains an analysis of selected indicators of legitimacy, human rights and inequality, as well as information about conflict events for eight African countries affected by the Arab Spring, namely Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Sudan, and Tunisia. The analyses described in this chapter allowed the determination of plausible estimates for input parameters such as legitimacy and welfare inequality, as well as patterns of size, duration and recurrence of conflict events in these countries. These results were used for setting the values of the input parameters, and for analyzing the plausibility of the solutions in the exploration of the agent-based model described in next chapter.


Social conflict datasets Indicators of conflict potential Statistical analyses “Arab Spring” Time history of conflict events 


  1. 5.
    P. Baker, The Conflict Assessment System Tool (CAST) (The Fund for Peace, New York, 2006)Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    D. Bischof, Why Arabs Rebel - Relative Deprivation Revisited. Master’s thesis, Fakultät Sozial und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, 2012Google Scholar
  3. 28.
    Freedom House, Freedom in the World, Individual Country Ratings and Status., 2015. Accessed 2015-07-13
  4. 33.
    B. Gilley, The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. Eur. J. Polit. Sci. 45, 499–525 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 34.
    B. Gilley, The Right to Rule. How States Win and Lose Legitimacy (Columbia University Press, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  6. 39.
    J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. (Pearson, Upper Saddle River, 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 45.
    C.M. Lemos, On Agent-Based Modelling of Large Scale Conflict Against a Central Authority: from Mechanisms to Complex Behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, ISCTE - University Institute of Lisbon and Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon, December 2016. ISBN: 978-989-8862-62-4Google Scholar
  8. 49.
    B. Milanovic, All the GINIS Dataset, 2014. Accessed 2016-03-28Google Scholar
  9. 55.
    R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013). ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  10. 59.
    W. Revelle, psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research, 2016Google Scholar
  11. 63.
    I. Salehyan, C. Hendrix, Social Conflict Analysis Database Version 3.1, November 2014Google Scholar
  12. 70.
    The Fund for Peace, Fragile States Index., 2015. Accessed 2015-11-09
  13. 71.
    The Robert S. Strauss Center, Social Conflict Analysis Database., 2015. Accessed 2015-07-25
  14. 75.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Division, World Population Prospects, 2015 Revision., 2015. Accessed 2015-12-16

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Lemos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Religion, Philosophy and HistoryUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations