Advertisement

Theoretical Foundations

  • Carlos M. Lemos
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)

Abstract

In this chapter a summary review of the state of the art on theories of large-scale social conflict against a central authority is presented. The review will be centered on two theories, Ted Gurr’s frustration-aggression theory on the psychological factors of civil violence and Gene Sharp’s theory of non-violent action. The first is very systematic and identifies the key variables and mechanisms of positive and negative drive for large-scale protest and violence. The second is also important because of its connection with the “Arab Spring,” which will be analyzed in later chapters. The chapter also includes some notes on the concept of legitimacy and concluding remarks on the implementation of social conflict theories in agent-based models.

Keywords

Social conflict Social conflict theories Violence Civil violence Legitimacy 

References

  1. 1.
    K. Allan, The Social Lens: An Invitation to Social and Sociology Theory (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    D. Beetham, Max weber and the legitimacy of the modern state. Analyse Kritik 13, 34–45 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 7.
    L. Berkowitz, Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation. Psychol. Bull. 106(1), 59–73 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 9.
    D. Bischof, Why Arabs Rebel - Relative Deprivation Revisited. Master’s thesis, Fakultät Sozial und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, 2012Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    R. Collins, Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science (Academic Press, New York, 1975)Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    L.A. Coser, Social conflict and the theory of social change. Br. J. Sociol. 8(3), 197–207 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 15.
    R. Dahrendorf, Toward a theory of social conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 2(2), 170–183 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 16.
    R. Dahrendorf, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1959)Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    J.C. Davies, Toward a theory of revolution. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27(1), 5–19 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 19.
    J. Dollard, L.W. Doob, N.E. Miller, O.H. Mowrer, R.R. Sears, Frustration and Aggression (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 29.
    J. Galtung, Violence, peace and peace research. J. Peace Res. 6(3), 167–191 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 30.
    J. Galtung, Cultural violence. J. Peace Res. 27(3), 291–305 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 33.
    B. Gilley, The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. Eur. J. Polit. Sci. 45, 499–525 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 34.
    B. Gilley, The Right to Rule. How States Win and Lose Legitimacy (Columbia University Press, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 37.
    T.R. Gurr, Psychological factors in civil violence. World Politics 20(2), 245–278 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 38.
    T.R. Gurr, Why Men Rebel (Routledge, 2011). Fortieth Anniversary Paperback EditionGoogle Scholar
  17. 46.
    K. Lorenz, On Aggression (Routledge Classics, London, 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 56.
    A. Raine, The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime (Vintage, New York, 2014)Google Scholar
  19. 57.
    L. Ray, Violence & Society (SAGE Publications, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi/Singapore, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 61.
    R.W. Rummel, Understanding Conflict and War Volume 2: The Conflict Helix (SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, 1976)Google Scholar
  21. 66.
    G. Sharp, From Dictatorship to Democracy, 4th edn. (The Albert Einstein Institution, Boston, 2010)Google Scholar
  22. 81.
    World Health Organization, Geneva, World Report on Violence and Health: Summary, 2002Google Scholar
  23. 83.
    S. Žižek, Violence (Profile Books, London, 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Lemos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Religion, Philosophy and HistoryUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations