Advertisement

The Top50 List Vivification in the Evolution of HPC Rankings

  • Dmitry NikitenkoEmail author
  • Artem Zheltkov
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 753)

Abstract

The most productive and powerful supercomputers always arouse great interest being flagships of the HPC machines fleet. These giants always require new forms of presentation because of innovations in design. This also leads to evaluation and development of new ways of comparison and supercomputer ranking. There is a variety of known regional and world-level rankings based on different methods. Every ranking is rich in peculiarities in its development. In this paper we try to observe the evaluation of supercomputing rankings and discuss our vision of vivification of the oldest regional ranking - The Top50 list of most productive supercomputers of Russia and CIS and its features.

Keywords

Supercomputer Model of supercomputer HPC ranking Performance and productiveness Comparison of HPC systems Methods of description for supercomputer design 

References

  1. 1.
    Top500 Supercomputing Sites Timeline. https://www.top500.org/timeline
  2. 2.
    Dongarra, J.J., Luszczek, P., Petitet, A.: The LINPACK benchmark: past, present and future. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 15, 803–820 (2003). doi: 10.1002/cpe.728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Green500 List. http://www.green500.org
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    HPGMG High-performance Geometric Multigrid. https://hpgmg.org
  6. 6.
    The Graph 500 List. http://www.graph500.org
  7. 7.
    Green Graph 500. http://green.graph500.org
  8. 8.
    Top50 Supercomputers of Russia and CIS. http://top50.supercomputers.ru
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    The Irish Supercomputer List. http://www.irishsupercomputerlist.org
  11. 11.
    Nikitenko, D.A.: Top50 rating as an indicator of progress in HPC area. In: High-Performance Parallel Computing on Cluster Environment (HPC-2010): Proceedings of the X International Conference (Perm, Russia, 2010), vol. 2, pp. 258–260. Publishing of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm (2010). http://hpc-education.unn.ru/files/conference_hpc/2010/files/2010_144(2).pdf
  12. 12.
    Nikitenko, D.A.: Top50 rating: where are we sneaking out? In: Supercomputers. no. 4 (16), pp. 60–61 (2013). http://supercomputers.ru/images/stories/Supercomputers_16-2013.pdf
  13. 13.
    Antonov, A.S., Nikitenko, D.A., Sobolev, S.I.: The 18th edition of the Top50 list of most powerful computers of Russia: expectations and prospects. In: Parallel Computational Technologies (PCT 2013): Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Ufa, Russia, 1–2 April 2013), pp. 258–260. Publishing of the South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk. http://omega.sp.susu.ru/books/conference/PaVT2013/short/161.pdf
  14. 14.
    Zheltkov, A.A.: Methods for describing high-performance computing systems and formation of supercomputer rankings. In: Russian Supercomputing Days: Proceedings of the International Conference (Moscow, Russia, 26–27 September 2016), Moscow State University, pp. 897–911 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Voevodin, V.V., Antonov, A.S., Dongarra, J.J.: Why is it hard to describe properties of algorithms? Procedia Comput. Sci. 101C, 3–6 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.11.002 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antonov, A.S., Voevodin, V.V., Voevodin, V.V., Teplov, A.M.: A study of the dynamic characteristics of software implementation as an essential part for a universal description of algorithm properties. In: 24th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing Proceedings, 17th–19th February 2016, pp. 359–363 (2016). doi: 10.1109/PDP.2016.24
  17. 17.
    Antonov, A.S., Frolov, A.V., Kobayashi, H., Konshin, I.N., Teplov, A.M., Voevodin, V.V., Voevodin, V.V.: Parallel processing model for cholesky decomposition algorithm in AlgoWiki Project. Supercomput. Front. Innov. 3(3), 61–70 (2016). doi: 10.14529/jsfi160307 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antonov, A.S., Nikitenko, D.A., Shvets, P.A., Sobolev, S.I., Stefanov, K.S., Voevodin, V.V., Voevodin, V.V., Zhumatiy, S.: An approach for ensuring reliable functioning of a supercomputer based on a formal model. In: Wyrzykowski, R., Deelman, E., Dongarra, J., Karczewski, K., Kitowski, J., Wiatr, K. (eds.) PPAM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9573, pp. 12–22. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32149-3_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nikitenko, D.A., Voevodin, V.V., Zhumatiy, S.A.: Resolving frontier problems of mastering large-scale supercomputer complexes. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (CF 2016), pp. 349–352. ACM, New York (2016). doi: 10.1145/2903150.2903481
  20. 20.
    Nikitenko, D.A., Voevodin, V.V., Zhumatiy, S.A.: Octoshell: large supercomputer complex administration system. In: Russian Supercomputing Days International Conference, Moscow, Russian Federation, 28–29 September 2015, Proceedings, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1482, pp. 69–83 (2015). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1482/069.pdf
  21. 21.
    Nikitenko, D.A., Zhumatiy, S.A., Shvets, P.A.: Making large-scale systems observable - another inescapable step towards exascale. J. Supercomput. Front. Innov. 3(2), 72–79 (2016). doi: 10.14529/jsfi160205 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Voevodin, V.V., Zhumatiy, S.A., Sobolev, S.I., Antonov, A.S., Bryzgalov, P.A., Nikitenko, D.A., Stefanov, K.S., Voevodin, V.V.: Supercomputer Lomonosov practices. In: Open Systems, no. 7, pp. 36–39 (2012). https://www.osp.ru/os/2012/07/13017641/
  23. 23.
    Mobile Linpack. http://linpack.hpc.msu.ru

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lomonosov Moscow State UniersityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations