Skip to main content

Taxonomic Corpus-Based Concept Summary Generation for Document Annotation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10450))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantic annotation is an enabling technology which links documents to concepts that unambiguously describe their content. Annotation improves access to document contents for both humans and software agents. However, the annotation process is a challenging task as annotators often have to select from thousands of potentially relevant concepts from controlled vocabularies. The best approaches to assist in this task rely on reusing the annotations of an annotated corpus. In the absence of a pre-annotated corpus, alternative approaches suffer due to insufficient descriptive texts for concepts in most vocabularies. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method for recommending document annotations based on generating node descriptors from an external corpus. We exploit knowledge of the taxonomic structure of a thesaurus to ensure that effective descriptors (concept summaries) are generated for concepts. Our evaluation on recommending annotations show that the content that we generate effectively represents the concepts. Also, our approach outperforms those which rely on information from a thesaurus alone and is comparable with supervised approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An example of documents used http://pubs.bgs.ac.uk/publications.html?pubID= B01745.

  2. 2.

    http://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoverymetadata/13603129.html.

  3. 3.

    http://data.bgs.ac.uk/doc/Geochronology.html.

  4. 4.

    http://data.bgs.ac.uk/doc/Lexicon.html.

  5. 5.

    Elasticsearch Java API http://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/java-api/5.2.

References

  1. Berlanga, R., Nebot, V., Pérez, M.: Tailored semantic annotation for semantic search. In: Web Semantics Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Trieschnigg, D., Pezik, P., Lee, V., De Jong, F., Kraaij, W., Rebholz-Schuhmann, D.: MeSH Up: effective MeSH text classification for improved document retrieval. Bioinformatics 25(11), 1412–1418 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M., Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4, pp. 73–96. NIST Special Publication SP (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Große-Bölting, G., Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: A comparison of different strategies for automated semantic document annotation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, vol. 8. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aronson, A.R., Mork, J.G., Gay, C.W., Humphrey, S.M., Rogers, W.J.: The NLM indexing initiative’s Medical Text Indexer. Medinfo 11(Pt 1), 268–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giannopoulos, G., Bikakis, N., Dalamagas, T., Sellis, T.: GoNTogle: a tool for semantic annotation and search. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6089, pp. 376–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13489-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, M., Névéol, A., Lu, Z.: Recommending MeSH terms for annotating biomedical articles. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(5), 660–667 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dramé, K., Mougin, F., Diallo, G.: Large scale biomedical texts classification: A kNN and an ESA-based approaches. J. Biomed. Semant. 7(1), 40 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aronson, A.R.: Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap program. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 17 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hulpus, I., Hayes, C., Karnstedt, M., Greene, D.: Unsupervised graph-based topic labelling using DBpedia. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 465–474. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: Wikimatch: using wikipedia for ontology matching. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ontology Matching, vol. 946, pp. 37–48. CEUR-WS.org (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández, M., Cantador, I., López, V., Vallet, D., Castells, P., Motta, E.: Semantically enhanced information retrieval: An ontology-based approach. Web Semantics Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 9(4), pp. 434–452 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hliaoutakis, A., Varelas, G., Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, E.G., Milios, E.: Information retrieval by semantic similarity. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 2(3), 55–73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knappe, R., Bulskov, H., Andreasen, T.: Perspectives on ontology-based querying. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 22(7), 739–761 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Leal Bando, L., Scholer, F., Turpin, A.: Query-biased summary generation assisted by query expansion. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(5), 961–979 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is partly funded by the British Geological Survey (BGS) through the BGS University Funding Initiative (BUFI). We are grateful for the valuable comments of our reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ikechukwu Nkisi-Orji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nkisi-Orji, I., Wiratunga, N., Hui, KY., Heaven, R., Massie, S. (2017). Taxonomic Corpus-Based Concept Summary Generation for Document Annotation. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67007-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67008-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics