Advertisement

A Performance Analysis of DF Model in the Energy Harvesting Half-Duplex and Full-Duplex Relay Networks

  • Kieu-Tam Nguyen
  • Hong-Nhu Nguyen
  • Ngoc-Long Nguyen
  • Thanh-Duc Le
  • Jaroslav Zdralek
  • Miroslav Voznak
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 741)

Abstract

Energy harvesting (EH) structure based on the ambient wireless communication technique, has lastly carried out the development approach to widen the existing time of the wireless networks. The energy collecting composition for the half duplex and full duplex wireless networks is examined. By employing the time switching-based relaying (TSR) networks and the Decode-and-Forward (DF) structure, we imply the approximated section of the operation probability and then estimate the throughput of the half-duplex and full-duplex wireless networks. We can see an essential outcome clearly based on the position of relaying, the achievement rate, the noise at the source and the relay as well as the energy transition component in TSR, effect on their outage possibility and throughput. Ultimately, the performances of the full-duplex (FD) and half-duplex (HD) wireless network architectures is different, the results are collected to demonstrate that, for a normal maximal networks, sometimes, FD one are more optimal than HD model and contrariwise, for instance, when the distance between the relay and the transmitter isn’t great, The outage possibility of the HD model is better than FD one. Or when rises \(\eta \), the HD throughput becomes better etc. With the same method, we also get the results illustrate that DF of two antennas is better than that of one antenna. Consequently, based on the practical condition, we determine what model is better.

Keywords

Energy harvesting Full-duplex Half-duplex Decode and forward Throughput 

References

  1. 1.
    Chuan, H., Rui, Z., & Shuguang, C. (2012). Delay-constrained Gaussian relay channel with energy harvesting nodes. In IEEE International Conference on in Communications ICC (pp. 2433–2438).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dang Khoa, N., & Ochi, H. (2014). On the impact of transceiver impairments to cognitive DF relay networks. In IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on in Circuits and Systems (APCCAS) (pp. 125–128).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nasir, A. A., Xiangyun, Z., Durrani, S., & Kennedy, R. A. (2014). Throughput and ergodic capacity of wireless energy harvesting based DF relaying network. In IEEE International Conference on in Communications (ICC) (pp. 4066–4071).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zihao, W., Zhiyong, C., Ling, L., Zixia, H., Bin, X., & Hui, L. (2014). Outage analysis of cognitive relay networks with energy harvesting and information transfer. In IEEE International Conference on in Communications (ICC) (pp. 4348–4353).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ke, X., Pingyi, F., & Ben Letaief, K. (2015). Time-switching based SWPIT for network-coded two-way relay transmission with data rate fairness. In IEEE International Conference on in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 5535–5539).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krikidis, I., Timotheou, S., Nikolaou, S., Gan, Z., Ng, D. W. K., & Schober, R. (2014). Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in modern communication systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y., & Wang, X. (2015). Information and Energy Cooperation in OFDM Relaying: Protocols and Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology  PP, 1–1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mousavifar, S. A., Yuanwei, L., Leung, C., Elkashlan, M., & Duong, T. Q. (2014). Wireless energy harvesting and spectrum sharing in cognitive radio. In 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mugen, P., Yuan, L., Quek, T. Q. S., & Chonggang, W. (2014). Device-to-device underlaid cellular networks under rician fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13, 4247–4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riihonen, T., Werner, S., & Wichman, R. (2011). Hybrid full-duplex/half duplex relaying with transmit power adaptation. IEEE Transactions Wireless Communications, 10, 3074–3085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, C., Zhang, R., & Cui, S. (2013). Throughput maximization for the gaussian relay channel with energy harvesting constraints. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(8), 14691479.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tutuncuoglu, K., Varan, B., & Yener, A. (2013). Energy harvesting two-way half-duplex relay channel with decode-and-forward relaying: Optimum power policies. In 2013 18th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhengguo, S., Goeckel, D. L., Leung, K. K., & Zhiguo, D. (2009). A stochastic geometry approach to transmission capacity in wireless cooperative networks. In 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (pp. 622–626).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, C., Yonghui, L., Luiz Rebelatto, J., Uchoa-Filho, B. F., & Vucetic, B. (2015). Harvest-then-cooperate: Wireless-powered cooperative communications. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63, 1700–1711.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong, X., Zheng, C., Zhiguo, D., & Nallanathan, A. (2014). Harvest-and-jam: Improving security for wireless energy harvesting cooperative networks. In Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (Vol. 2014, pp. 3145–3150), IEEE.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huan, Y., Yunzhou, L., Xibin, X., & Jing, W. (2014). Energy harvesting relay-assisted cellular networks based on stochastic geometry approach. In International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG) (Vol. 2014, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jia, X., Xing, Z., Jiewu, W., Zhenhai, Z., & Wenbo, W. (2014). Performance analysis of cognitive relay networks with imperfect channel knowledge over Nakagami-m fading channels. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (Vol. 2014, pp. 839–844). IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sibomana, L., Zepernick, H. J., & Hung, T. (2014). Wireless information and power transfer in an underlay cognitive radio network. In 2014 8th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS) (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sixing, Y., Erqing, Z., Zhaowei, Q., Liang, Y., & Shufang, L. (2014). Optimal cooperation strategy in cognitive radio systems with energy harvesting. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13, 4693–4707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sixing, Y., Zhaowei, Q., & Shufang, L. (2015). Achievable throughput optimization in energy harvesting cognitive radio systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33, 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kieu, T. N., Do, D.-T., Xuan, X. N., Nhat, T. N., & Duy, H. H. (2016). Wireless information and power transfer for full duplex relaying networks: Performance analysis. In: AETA 2015: Recent Advances in Electrical Engineering and Related Sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, ch. Wireless Information and Power Transfer for Full Duplex Relaying Networks: Performance Analysis (p. 5362). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27247-4-5.
  22. 22.
    David, H. A. (1970). Order Statistics. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kieu-Tam Nguyen
    • 1
  • Hong-Nhu Nguyen
    • 1
  • Ngoc-Long Nguyen
    • 2
  • Thanh-Duc Le
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Zdralek
    • 1
  • Miroslav Voznak
    • 1
  1. 1.VSB-Technical University of OstravaOstravaCzech Republic
  2. 2.Ton Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations