Advertisement

Making the News: An ICC Simulation in the Erasmus + Context

  • Teresa Siek-PiskozubEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

In recent years international educational documents for foreign language teaching have tended to assign intercultural communicative competence (ICC) as its major goal. It is particularly true in the context of teaching English due to its lingua franca role. Yet research shows that foreign language teachers feel unprepared to assume the role of intercultural mediators and foreign language course books do not make this task any easier. There are, however, special intercultural sets which may be of use and teachers’ willingness and creativity is all that is needed. The goal of this article is to show how language and intercultural teaching can be intertwined using the example of one class run with Erasmus+ students in one of the Polish universities.

Keywords

Intercultural communicative competence Foreign language teaching Simulations 

References

  1. Bennett, M. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. R. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brander, P., Cardens, C., Gomes, R., Taylor, M., & de Vincente Abada, J. (1995). All different all equal: Education pack. Ideas, resources, methods and activities for informal intercultural education with young people and adults. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  5. Corbett, J. (2003). An intercultural approach to English language teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. Deardorff, K. D. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derenowski, M. (2015). Teaching culture in the FL senior high school classroom. Coursebook evaluation and teachers’ and learners’ views. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden dimensions: Doing business with the Japanese. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  12. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: A software of mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, P., & O’Neill, G. (2012). Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huber-Kriegler, M., Lázár, I., & Strange, J. (2003). Mirrors and windows. An intercultural communication textbook. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
  15. Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1990). Notes in the history of intercultural communication: The Foreign Service Institute and the mandate for intercultural training. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 262–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubecka, A. (1998). Interkulturowa kompetencja komunikacyjna – jak wykorzystać gry symulacyjne do jej osiągnięcia [Intercultural communicative competence—how to use simulation games to develop it]. Biuletyn Glottodydaktyczny UJ Kraków, 4, 59–74.Google Scholar
  17. Newton, J. (2012). Teaching English for intercultural spoken communication: From CLT to iCLT. In H. P. Widodo & A. Cirocki (Eds.), Innovation and creativity in ELT methodology (pp. 29–42). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Siek-Piskozub, T. (2006). Constructivism in language pedagogy. In E. Jezińska-Lorek, T. Siek-Piskozub, & K. Więckowska (Eds.), Worlds in the making. Constructivism and postmodern knowledge (pp. 159–172). Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Siek-Piskozub, T. (2013). Simulations as communication, culture and creativity (3 in 1). In E. Wąsikiewicz-Firlej & H. Lankiewicz (Eds.), From classroom to workplace: Advances in applied linguistics (pp. 16–30). Piła: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Staszica.Google Scholar
  20. Sobkowiak, P. (2015). Interkulturowość w edukacji językowej [Interculturality in language education]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
  21. Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. (1999). Retrieved from http://globalteachinglearning.com/standards/5cs.shtml; file://C:/Users/tpisk/Documents/World-ReadinessStandardsforLearningLanguages.pdf.
  22. Weaver, G. (2001). American cultural values. Retrieved from www.gmfus.org/doc/mmf/American%20Cultural%20Values.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations