Tinker, Tailor…: Creativity in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching

  • Liliana PiaseckaEmail author
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)


The word creativity has recently won great popularity in numerous contexts, showing both positive (“creative writing”) and negative (“creative accounting”) connotations. The concept itself has many meanings as it may refer to the end product of one’s activity, the cognitive processes involved in the creative act, the personality of a creative person, the development of creativity across the life span, and also the factors that either stimulate or inhibit the process of creation (Łukasik, 2015; Simonton, 2000). There is also a distinction between exceptional creativity, manifesting itself in important works that are significant for a given society, and everyday creativity, which can be observed in everyday life activities that involve a degree of originality. In addition, creativity is no longer perceived as an individual propensity only but as a characteristic that all humans share but may not be aware of its potential. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the role of creativity in learning and using foreign languages. It brings together three perspectives on creativity, that is the psychological, the linguistic, and the educational. These three domains are extremely important for facing present-day challenges and understanding the meaning of creativity in life. Therefore, first the definition of creativity proposed by cognitive psychologists is discussed along with a variety of approaches to the phenomenon. Second, the creative nature of language is touched upon and the place of creativity in education is highlighted. Finally, the foreign language classroom is focused on as a nest of creativity. Learning a new language requires learners to create utterances they may not be confident about, yet they take the risk of producing them. Moreover, teachers may introduce many creative tasks and activities that are motivating, involving and rewarding and give learners a sense of joy, excitement, and fulfilment.


Creativity Linguistic creativity Foreign language learning Creative classroom activities 


  1. Albert, Á. (2006). Learner creativity as a potentially important variable: Examining the relationships between learner creativity, language aptitude and level of proficiency. In M. Nikolov & J. Horváth (Eds.), UPRT 2006: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 77–98). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, Á., & Kormos, J. (2004). Creativity and narrative task performance: An exploratory study. Language Learning, 54, 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barsalou, L. W., & Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 267–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 10–15.Google Scholar
  6. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, J. (2013). Generating minds. English Journal, 102(6), 25–30.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Attention and the holistic approach to behaviour. In K. S. Pope, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness (pp. 335–358). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper/Collins.Google Scholar
  14. De Dreu, C., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fasko, D., Jr. (2000). -2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 317–327.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, T. L. (2009, October 20). The new untouchables. New York Times. Retrieved from
  17. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Ghonsooly, B. (2012). The effects of foreign language learning on creativity. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–167. doi: 10.5539/elt.v5n4p161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(2), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1987). Creativity and learning. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library.Google Scholar
  22. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoff, I. K. (2011). Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits in convergent thinking come with losses in divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273.Google Scholar
  24. Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Seboek (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, R. H. (2016). Introduction. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 1–22). London: Roultledge.Google Scholar
  26. Karnes, M. B., McCoy, G. F., Zehrbach, R. R., Wollersheim, J. P., Clarizio, H. F., Costin, L., & Stanley, L. S. (1961). Factors associated with underachievement and overachievement of intellectually gifted children. Champaign, IL: Champaign Community Unit Schools.Google Scholar
  27. Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2015). The creative mind. In C. Jones, M. Lorenzen, & J. Sapsed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creative industries (pp. 34–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Leiken, M., & Tovli, E. (2014). Bilingualism and creativity in early childhood. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 411–417. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.961779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Łukasik, B. (2015). Twórczość w edukacji akademickiej – zasady, metody i techniki stymulowania twórczego myślenia studentów [Creation in academic education—rules, methods and techniques of stimulation of students’ creative thinking]. Prace Naukowe Akademii im Jana Długosza w Częstochowie, 17, 203–212.Google Scholar
  32. Maley, A. (2015). Overview: The what, the why and the how. In A. Maley & N. Peachey (Eds.), Creativity in the English language classroom (pp. 6–13). London: British Council.Google Scholar
  33. Maybin, J. (2016). Everyday language creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 25–39). London: Roultledge.Google Scholar
  34. McCabe, M. P. (1991). Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic performance. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 25(2), 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. R. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitias, M. (1985). Preface. In M. Mitias (Ed.), Creativity in art, religion, and culture (pp. 1–2). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  37. Moon, R. (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English. A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nęcka, E. (2001). Psychologia twórczości [Psychology of creativity]. Gdańsk: GWP.Google Scholar
  40. Ockuly, M., & Richards, R. (2013). Loving or fearing creativity. NeuroQuantology, 11(2), 256–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ottó, I. (1998). The relationship between individual differences in learner creativity and language learning success. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piasecka, L. (2013a). Putting bits and pieces together: Awareness of text structure in jigsaw reading. In A. Łyda & K. Szczesniak (Eds.), Awareness in action, second language learning and teaching (183–193). Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00461-7_12.
  43. Piasecka, L. (2013b). “In time of daffodils who know”—reading poetry in a foreign language classroom. In E. Mańczak-Wohlfeld & M. Jodłowiec (Eds.), Exploring the microcosm and macrocosm of language teaching and learning. A festschrift on the occasion of 70th birthday of Professor Anna Niżegorodcew (pp. 93–104). Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Piasecka, L. (2013c). Reading poems in foreign language learning contexts—an educational option. Journal of the Worldwide Forum on Education and Culture, 4(1), 61–72.Google Scholar
  45. Piasecka, L. (2016). Activating character strengths through poetic encounters in a foreign language—a case study. In D. Gabryś-Barker & D. Gałajda (Eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 75–92). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Pope, R,. & Swann, J. (2011). Introduction: Creativity, language, literature. In J. Swann, R. Pope, & R. Carter (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature. The state of the art (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  47. Ricciardelli, L. A. (1992). Creativity and bilingualism. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richards, J. (2013). Creativity in language teaching. Plenary address given at the Summer Institute for English Teacher of Creativity and Discovery in Teaching University Writing, City University of Hong Kong, 5th June 2013.
  49. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds (new ed.). Chichester: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  50. Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Runco, M. (2014, March 1). Common questions and difficulty of creativity education [Web log message]. Retrieved from
  52. Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simonton, D. K., & Damian, R. I. (2013). Creativity. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 796–808). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sullivan, P. (2012). Essential habits of mind for college readiness. College English, 74(6), 547–553.Google Scholar
  58. Wei, L. (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OpoleOpolePoland

Personalised recommendations