Advertisement

The Effect of Strategy Instruction on English Majors’ Use of Affective Strategies and Anxiety Levels

  • Jakub BielakEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

The chapter reports a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study extending over one year which investigated the effects of strategy instruction (SI) aimed at anxiety reduction on affective strategy use, and language and test anxiety levels. Strategy use and anxiety levels were investigated not only in general terms (self-reported anxiety levels in a given type of situation, self-reported frequency of strategy use) but also in relation to two implementations of an actual oral English exam (self-reported anxiety and use of strategies before, during and after an oral English exam). The participants were English majors in a small Polish university (N = 23). The tools used were language learning strategy use surveys including Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (Oxford, 1990), Reactions to Tests (Sarason, 1984; a test anxiety survey), Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope, 1986), and anxometers (1-item 1–10 scales for measuring state anxiety). The results indicate that affective SI results in greater affective strategy use as well as the use of a larger range of strategies in general and in relation to the actual language exam when it is properly contextualized. An unequivocal reduction in anxiety levels as a result of SI was not detected possibly due to an insufficient amount of treatment and a small number of highly-anxious learners in the sample, with only some indications of an anxiety-reducing effect.

Keywords

Language learning strategies Affective strategies Strategy instruction Language anxiety Test anxiety 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the anonymous reviewer as well as the editors of this volume for their insightful comments which helped improve the chapter. Obviously, I take full responsibility for the errors which remain.

References

  1. Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope’s construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 78, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atay, D., & Ozbulgan, C. (2007). Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocabulary recall. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2006.01.002.
  3. Bielak, J., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Investigating English majors’ affective and meta-affective strategy use, test anxiety, and strategy training. In R. Oxford & C. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Situating strategy use: Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, M. L. (2014). Strategy instruction for Macao EFL students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2, 990–1004. doi: 10.12691/education-2-11-1.Google Scholar
  5. Chaury, P. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on reading comprehension in English as a foreign language. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 6. Retrieved from http://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/1_Chaury_Patrick.pdf.
  6. Chen, Y. (2007). Learning to learn: The impact of strategy training. ELT Journal, 61(1), 20–29. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccl041.
  7. Cizek, G., & Burg, S. (2006). Addressing test anxiety in a high stakes environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cuddy, A. (2012). Your body language shapes who you are: TEDtalks. Video file. http://www.ted.com/talks/amy_cuddy_your_body_language_shapes_who_you_are. Accessed January 23, 2014.
  11. De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Silva, R., & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewaele, J.-M. (2007). The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of the language learner. In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 193–214). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. Ergene, T. (2003). Effective interventions on test anxiety reduction. School Psychology International, 24(3), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faber, G. (2010). Enhancing orthographic competencies and reducing domain-specific test anxiety: The systematic use of algorithmic and self-instructional task formats in remedial spelling training. International Journal of Special Education, 25, 78–88.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A Student’s contributions to second language learning: Part II. Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gkonou, Ch., & Oxford, R. L. (2016). Managing Your Emotions for Language Learning Questionnaire. Version 4.1. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Teaching and researching language learning strategies (pp. 317–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  21. Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hupkova, M. (2011). Developing social abilities in helping professions. Bratislava: Iris.Google Scholar
  24. Kralova, Z., Skorvagova, E., Tirpakova, A., & Markechova, D. (2017). Reducing student teachers’ foreign language pronunciation anxiety through psycho-social training. System, 65, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154–167. doi: 10.1017/S026144480999036X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horwitz, E. K. (2016). Reflections on Horwitz (1986). Preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 932–935. doi: 10.1002/tesq.295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horwitz, E. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications [Kindle version]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  28. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iwai, C. (2006). Linguistic and pedagogical values of teaching communication strategies: Integrating the notion of communication strategies with studies of second language acquisition. Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima City University.Google Scholar
  30. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, E. J. (2016). Reducing international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation corrections. System, 56, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in second and foreign language classrooms. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  35. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relationship to other anxieties and to the processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2016). Positive psychology in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  38. Manoli, P., Papadopoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2016). Investigating the immediate and delayed effects of multiple-reading strategy instruction in primary EFL classrooms. System, 56, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  42. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  43. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Oxford, R. L., & Amerstorfer, C. M. (Eds.). (in press). Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  45. Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. L. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 153–175.Google Scholar
  46. Parra, Y. J. F. (2010). Explicit teaching of socio-affective language learning strategies to beginner EFL students. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 15, 145–169.Google Scholar
  47. Pawlak, M. (2010). Designing and piloting a tool for the measurement of the use of pronunciation learning strategies. Research in Language, 8, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pawlak, M. (2011). Anxiety as a factor influencing the use of language learning strategies. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp. 149–165). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61, 993–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Rossiter, M. J. (2003). The effects of affective strategy training in the ESL classroom. TESL-EJ, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej26/ej26a2/.
  52. Sarafianou, A., & Gavriilidou, Z. (2015). The effect of strategy-based instruction on strategy use by upper-secondary Greek students of EFL. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 12(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  53. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shams, A. N. (2005). The use of computerized pronunciation practice in the reduction of foreign language classroom anxiety (Doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.Google Scholar
  55. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spielberger, Ch. D, Anton, W. D., & Bedell, J. (1976). The nature and treatment of test anxiety. In M. Zuckermann & Ch. D Spielberger (Eds.), Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 317–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Spielberger, Ch. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process. In Ch. D. Spielberger & P. R. Vagg (Eds.), Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 3–14). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  58. Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodatari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a Difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. von der Embse, N., Barterian, J., & Segool, N. (2013). Test anxiety interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review of treatment studies from 2000–2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. doi: 10.1002/pits.21660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weems, C. F., Taylor, L. K., Costa, N. M., Marks, A. B., Romano, D. M., Verrett, S. L., & Brown, D. M. (2009). Effect of a school-based test anxiety intervention in ethnic minority youth exposed to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37, 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Young, D. J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low anxiety classroom atmosphere. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  64. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznań, KaliszPoland
  2. 2.State University of Applied SciencesKoninPoland

Personalised recommendations