Advertisement

SPAD-Based Flash Lidar with High Background Light Suppression

  • Olaf M. SchreyEmail author
  • Maik Beer
  • Werner Brockherde
  • Bedrich J. Hosticka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

In this contribution, we present the concept of a 4×128 pixel line sensor for direct time-of-flight measurement based on single-photon avalanche diodes (SPAD) fabricated in a high-voltage automotive 0.35 μm CMOS process. An in-pixel time-to-digital converter with a resolution of 312.5 ps determines the arrival of photons reflected from targets in the area of view. Since we are employing a so-called first photon approach, there are no dead-time effects. In addition, our approach uses a variable photon coincidence detection to suppress effects of ambient illumination. As a test vehicle we have implemented a 1×80 pixel CMOS SPAD line sensor and characterized it.

Keywords

Lidar Time-of-Flight CMOS-Chip 

References

  1. Ackerman E (2016) Lidar that will make self-driving cars affordable [News]. IEEE Spectr 53(10):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronzi D, Villa F, Bellisai S, Markovic B, Tisa S, Tosi A, Zappa F, Weyers S, Durini D, Brockherde W, Paschen U (2012) Low-noise and large-area CMOS SPADs with timing response free from slow tails. In: Proceedings of the European solid-state device research conference (ESSDERC), pp 230–233Google Scholar
  3. Beer M, Hosticka B J, Kokozinski R, (2016) SPAD-based 3D sensors for high ambient illumination. In: Conference on Ph.D. research in microelectronics and electronics (PRIME), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  4. Jeremias R, Brockherde, W, Doemens G, Hosticka B, Listl L, Mengel P (2001) A CMOS photosensor array for 3D imaging using pulsed laser, digest of technical papers. In: IEEE international solid-state circuits conference, pp. 252–253Google Scholar
  5. Spickermann A, Durini D, Süss A, Ulfig W, Brockherde W, Hosticka B J, Schwoppe S, Grabmair A (2011) CMOS 3D image sensor based on pulse modulated TOF principle and intrinsic LDPD pixels, In: Proceedings of the European solid-state circuit conference (ESSCIRC), pp 111–114Google Scholar
  6. Yu DF, Fessler JA (2000) Mean and variance of single photon counting with deadtime. Phys Med Biol 45(7):2043–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer M, Schrey O, Hosticka B J, Kokozinski R (2017) Dead time effects in the indirect time-of-flight measurement with SPADs, In: IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, vol 1168, session A3L-GGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayat MM, Torres SN, Pedrotti LM (1999) Theory of photon coincidence statistics in photon-correlated beams. Optics Commun 169(1–6):275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Niclass C, Soga M, Matsubara H, Kato S, Kagami M (2013) A 100-m range 10-frame/s 340 × 96-pixel time-of-flight depth sensor in 0.18 µm CMOS. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 48(2):559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olaf M. Schrey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maik Beer
    • 1
  • Werner Brockherde
    • 1
  • Bedrich J. Hosticka
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Microelectronic Circuits and Systems (IMS)DuisburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Electronic Components and CircuitsUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations