Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles. A Freeway Scenario

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

Abstract

In the next decades, road transport will undergo a deep transformation with the advent of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), which promise to drastically change the way we commute. CAVs hold significant potential to positively affect traffic flows, air pollution, energy use, productivity, comfort, and mobility. On the other hand, there is an increasing number of sources and reports highlighting potential problems that may arise with CAVs, such as, conservative driving (relaxed thresholds), problematic interaction with human-driven vehicles (inability to take decisions based on eye contact or body language) and increased traffic demand. Therefore, it is of high importance to assess vehicle automated functionalities in a case-study simulation. The scope of this paper is to present some preliminary results regarding the impact assessment of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) on the case-study of the ring road of Antwerp, which is responsible for almost 50% of the traffic and pollution of the city. Scenarios with various penetration rates and traffic demands were simulated showing that coordination of vehicles may be needed to significantly reduce traffic congestion and energy use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alonso Raposo M, Ciuffo B, Makridis M, Thiel C (to be published) The r-evolution of driving: from Connected Vehicles to Coordinated Automated Road Transport (C-ART). Eur Comm

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaout GM, Bowling S (2014) A progressive deployment strategy for cooperative adaptive cruise control to improve traffic dynamics. Int J Autom Comput 11:10–18. doi:10.1007/s11633-014-0760-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert SC, van den Broek THA, van Noort M (2012) Cooperative driving in mixed traffic networks - Optimizing for performance. In: 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. pp 861–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin H, Okuda H, Tazaki Y, Suzuki T (2015) Model predictive cooperative cruise control in mixed traffic. In: IECON 2015—41st Annual Conference IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. pp 003199–003205

    Google Scholar 

  • Degraeuwe B, Thunis P, Clappier A, Weiss M, Lefebvre W, Janssen S, Vranckx S (2016) Impact of passenger car NOx emissions and NO2 fractions on urban NO2 pollution—Scenario analysis for the city of Antwerp, Belgium. Atmos Environ 126:218–224. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do lower speed limits on motorways reduce fuel consumption and pollutant emissions?—European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/transport/speed-limits. Accessed 1 Jun 2017

  • Fakharian Qom S, Xiao Y, Hadi M (2016) Evaluation of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) vehicles on managed lanes utilizing macroscopic and mesoscopic simulation

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank M, Wolfe P (1956) An algorithm for quadratic programming. Nav Res Logist Q 3:95–110. doi:10.1002/nav.3800030109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gipps PG (1981) A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 15:105–111. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgin Guler S, Menendez M, Meier L (2014) Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 46:121–131. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloostra B, Roorda MJ (2017) Fully autonomous vehicles: analyzing transportation network performance and operating scenarios in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre W, Vercauteren J, Schrooten L, Janssen S, Degraeuwe B, Maenhaut W, de Vlieger I, Vankerkom J, Cosemans G, Mensink C, Veldeman N, Deutsch F, Van Looy S, Peelaerts W, Lefebre F (2011) Validation of the MIMOSA-AURORA-IFDM model chain for policy support: Modeling concentrations of elemental carbon in Flanders. Atmos Environ 45:6705–6713. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre W, Van Poppel M, Maiheu B, Janssen S, Dons E (2013) Evaluation of the RIO-IFDM-street canyon model chain. Atmos Environ 77:325–337. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2015) Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X-Y, Kan XD, Shladover SE, Wei D, Ferlis RA (2017) An enhanced microscopic traffic simulation model for application to connected automated vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmassani HS (2016) 50th anniversary invited article—autonomous vehicles and connected vehicle systems: Flow and operations considerations. Transp Sci 50:1140–1162. doi:10.1287/trsc.2016.0712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoduy D (2013) Instability of cooperative adaptive cruise control traffic flow: A macroscopic approach. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18:2838–2851. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.02.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Open street maps https://planet.openstreetmap.org/ Accessed 31 May 2017

  • Pavlovic J, Marotta A, Ciuffo B (2016) CO2 emissions and energy demands of vehicles tested under the NEDC and the new WLTP type approval test procedures. Appl Energy 177:661–670. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shladover S, Su D, Lu X-Y (2012) Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2324:63–70. doi:10.3141/2324-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Arem B, van Driel CJG, Visser R (2006) The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 7:429–436. doi:10.1109/TITS.2006.884615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao L, Wang M, van Arem B (2017) Realistic car-following models for microscopic simulation of adaptive and cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michail Makridis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Makridis, M., Mattas, K., Ciuffo, B., Raposo, M.A., Thiel, C. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Connected and Automated Vehicles. A Freeway Scenario. In: Zachäus, C., Müller, B., Meyer, G. (eds) Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2017. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66972-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66972-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66971-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66972-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics