Abstract
The article reveals the specifics of artistic research and the controversies of its assessment. It shares the view that the goal of artistic research is to contribute both to the artistic universe and to the sphere of academia while using artistic production; however, it asks how it is possible, or if it is possible at all, to transmit new knowledge through the artwork. While discussing the premises for the rise of artistic research , the article introduces different concepts of knowledge , paying special attention to the notion of embodied knowledge. Further, the article proposes two approaches to artistic research —idealistic and pragmatic. Finally, it focuses on the topic of research in acting and discusses the relevant research outcome. In conclusion the article suggests that the most valuable thing about artistic research is consolidation of academic and artistic interests in order to produce innovative visions of future art.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See, for example, the works of Tim Ingold The Perception of Environment (2000) and Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description (2011) or studies of Mark Johnson The Body in the Mind : The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason (1987) and The Meaning of the Body : Aesthetics of Human Understanding (2007). The main premise for the perception-action approach is that evolution shaped humans’ perceptual processing primarily for action (not for reaction or information gathering).
- 2.
We could find more philosophical, cultural and sociocultural premises explaining the rise of artistic research . The nomadic theory of Deleuze and Guattari, which includes the metaphors of rhizome and labyrinth, has apparently strongly influenced the above-mentioned conception. Nomadic theory rejected the attitude of classical Western metaphysics that emphasizes strictly organized structure of subsistence and on the causal determinism and binary thinking, and foregrounded the necessity of free creative and spontaneous thinking and the ability to change.
- 3.
The viewpoint is determined to a large extent by the philosophical tradition. For example, phenomenology tends to equal experience and knowledge . As David George explains, “the term ‘experience ’ is crucial: for too long spectators have been equated with readers as decipherers of meaning. … The traditional task of ‘making sense’ is then replaced by unique experiences, which are both cognitive operations and forms of emotion. The word ‘experience ’ derives etymologically from the French ‘to put to the test’. Experience is an experiment” (George 1996: 23).
- 4.
The dissemination of artistic research outcome is one of the most topical questions. The difficulties arise mainly because of specifics of knowledge generated by this kind of research: embodied forms of knowledge go beyond language. An international database of artistic research can be found on www.researchcatalogue.net; the project Research Video, which is currently developed at Zurich University of the Arts (www.zhdk.ch), can be mentioned as an attempt to find the relevant form for communication and publishing artistic research in the performing arts.
- 5.
In general, this does not contradict Spatz’s view that every practice is structured by a certain technique, as knowing how to create favorable artistic conditions may be equated to a kind of technique.
References
Blair, Rhonda. 2008. The Actor, Image, and Action. Acting and Cognitive Neuroscience. London and New York: Routledge.
Borgdorff, Henk. 2010. The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research. In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, eds. Biggs and Karlsson, 44–58. London and New York: Routledge.
Borgdorff, Henk. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Borgdorff, Henk. 2013. A Brief Survey of Current Debates on the Concepts and Practices of Research in the Art. In Share. Handbook for Artistic Research Education, eds. Mick Wilson and Schelte van Ruiten, 146–152. Wormerveer: Zwaan Printmedia.
Coessens, Kathleen, Darla Crispin, and Anne Douglas. 2009. The Artistic Turn. A Manifesto. Ghent: Orpheus Instituut/Leuven University Press.
Collins, H.M. 2001. What is tacit knowledge? In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, eds. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 115–128. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Fisher-Lichte, Erika. 2004. Ästhetik des Performativen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
George, David. 1996. Performance Epistemology. Performance Research 1(1) (Spring): 16–25.
Hannula, Mika, Juha Suoranta, and Tere Vadén. 2005. Artistic Research—Theories, Methods and Practices. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Fine Arts.
Haseman, Brad. 2007. Tightrope Writing: Creative Writing Programs in the RQF Environment. Text. Journal of Writing and Writing Courses. http://www.textjournal.com.au/april07/haseman.htm. Accessed 1 Feb 2017.
Hodge, Alison. 2010. Actor Training for the Relational Actor. New York: Routledge.
Hornsby, Jennifer. 2012. Ryle’s Knowing-How, and Knowing-How to Act. In Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind and Action, ed. J. Bengson, and M. Moffett, 80–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurt, Melissa. 2014. Arthur Lessac’s Embodied Actor Training. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Kozel, Susan. 2010. The Virtual and the Physical: A Phenomenological Approach to Performance Research. In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, eds. Biggs and Karlsson, 204–222. London and New York: Routledge.
López-Cano, Rubén. 2015. Art research, Music Knowledge and the Contemporary Crisis. Art Research Journal 2 (1): 69–94.
May, Shaun. 2015. Rethinking Practice as Research and the Cognitive Turn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Michelkevičius, Vytautas. 2015. Meninio tyrimo sampratos ir kontekstai: paini pradžia ir atspirties taškai. In Meninis tyrimas: teorija ir praktika, ed. Vytautas Michelkevičius, 31–43. Vilnius: Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis.
Nelson, Robin. 2006. Practice-as-research and the Problem of Knowledge. Performance Research 11 (4): 105–116.
Nelson, Robin. 2013. Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Noë, Alva. 2005. Against Intellectualism. Analysis 65 (4): 278–290.
Pears, David. 1971. What is Knowledge?. London: Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Potter, Nicole (ed.). 2002. Movement for Actors. New York: Allworth Press.
Russel, Bertrand 1912 [1967]. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.
Ryle, Gilbert. 1963 [1949]. The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books.
Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001. Introduction. Practice Theory. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, eds. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 10–23. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Schechner, Richard. 2001. Rasaesthetics. TDR 45 (3): 27–50.
Solleveld, Floris. 2012. A Paradigm for What? Review of: Henk Borgdorff (2012) The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Krisis. Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 2: 78–82. http://ceac.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/uploads/file/seminaires/2014/krisis.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.
Spatz, Ben. 2015. What a Body can Do. Technique as Knowledge, Practice as Research. London and New York: Routledge.
Zarrilli, Phillip B., Jerri Daboo, and Rebecca Loukes. 2013. Acting: Psychophysical Phenomenon and Process. Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balevičiūtė, R. (2018). Artistic Research as a Quest of the New Knowledge. On Practice-Based Research in Acting. In: Andreica, O., Olteanu, A. (eds) Readings in Numanities. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66914-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66914-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66913-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66914-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)