Phenomenology of Imaginal Space

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 39)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relation between perceptual and imaginal space. I argue that, notwithstanding the differences between acts of imagining and acts of perceiving, common structures in the spatial appearance of perceived things, physical images, and imagined or phantasized objects should be recognized. In the first section, some controversial issues concerning the spatiality of images in the so-called mental imagery debate are introduced. One of the most problematic aspects in this debate is the ambiguity in the use of the concept of ‘space’ which does not allow us to distinguish between spatial form and existence in space. The distinction between spatial form and existence in space will be further discussed in the second section by means of a reassessment of the spatiality of perceptual things, considered independently of their material features. The third and final section is devoted to the inquiry into imaginal space. It focuses on both the spatiality of physical images and the spatiality of phantasized objects, and considers both in relation to perceptual space. It is argued that, with relevant variations, the essential features characterizing the spatiality of purely perceptual objects (considered independently from their materiality) also characterize the spatiality of images and phantasized objects. This will eventually provide a phenomenologically grounded argument supporting the ideality of space, understood as ‘intuitive space of possibilities’.

References

  1. Bernet, R. (2004). Conscience et existence: Perspectives phénoménologiques. Paris: Epiméthée. Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casey, E. (2000). Imagining. A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fink, E. (1966). Studien zur Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, E. (1952a). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie III. Die Phänomenologie und die Fundamente der Wissenschaften (Husserliana V). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. (English translation: Husserl, E. (1980a). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Third Book. Phenomenology and the Foundation of the Sciences (E. Klein & William E. Pohl, Trans.). Den Haag/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff.)Google Scholar
  5. Husserl, E. (1952b). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution (Husserliana IV). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907 (Husserliana XVI). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie(Husserliana III/1). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (1980b). Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925). (Husserliana XXIII). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis (Husserliana XIX/1). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Jansen, J. (2010). Phenomenology, Imagination and Interdisciplinary Research. In Sh Gallagher & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences (pp. 141–158). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge (MA)/ London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kosslyn, S. M. (1983). Ghosts in the Mind’s Machine. Creating and Using Images in the Brain. London: Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  13. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain. The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge (MA)/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). Mental imagery. In S. Kosslyn & D. Osherson (Eds.),Visual Cognition. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. 2 (pp. 267–296). Cambridge (MA)/ London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marbach, E. (1993). Mental Representation and Consciousness. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mattens, F. (2006). On the Introduction of the Concept of Phantom in Ideas II: A Case-study in Husserl’s Theory of Constitution. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, IV, 83–107.Google Scholar
  17. McGinn, C. (2004). Mindsight. Image, Dream, Meaning. Cambridge (MA)/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Melle, U. (1998). Signitive und Signifikative Intentionen. Husserl Studies, 15(3), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1985). L’oeil et l’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Panofsky, E. (1980). Die Perspektive als symbolische Form. In E. Panofsky, Aufsätze zu Grundfragen der Kunstwissenschaft, hrsg. von Hariolf Oberer & Egon Verheyen (pp 99–167). Berlin: Volker Spiess.Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, J., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). The Heterogeneity of Mental Representation: Ending the Imagery Debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 112(33), 10089–10092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polanyi, M. (1970). What is a Painting? British Journal of Aesthetics, 10(3), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental Imagery. In Search of a Theory. Behavorial and Brain Sciences, 25, 157–238.Google Scholar
  24. Sartre, J.-P. (1986). Psychologie phénoménologique de l’imagination. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  25. Sartre, J.-P. (2004). The Imaginary. A Philosophical Psychology of the Imagination (J. Webber,Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Sartre, J.-P. (2005). L’imaginaire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  27. Shum, P. (2015). The Evolution and Implications of Husserl’s Account of the Imagination. Husserl Studies, 31(3), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sokolowski, R. (1977). Picturing. The Review of Metaphysics, XXXI, 1, 3–28.Google Scholar
  29. Spinicci, P. (1997). Il palazzo di Atlante. Contributi per una fenomenologia della rappresentazione prospettica. Milano: Guerini & Associati.Google Scholar
  30. Strawson, P. F. (1974). Imagination and perception. In P. F. Strawson (Ed.), Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (pp. 45–65). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  31. Summa, M. (2014a). Der Gegenstand ohne Begriff und die Schichtung der Erfahrung bei Husserl und Kant. In F. Fabbianelli & S. Luft (Eds.), Husserl und die klassische deutsche Philosophie (pp. 133–145). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Summa, M. (2014b). Spatio-Temporal Intertwining. Husserl’s Transcendental Aesthetic. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Summa, M. (2015). Ein sinnloses Gewühl? Die Hypothese des Chaos und ihre Implikationen bei Kant und Husserl. In Ch. Asmuth & P. Remmers (Eds.), Ästhetisches Wissen (pp. 189–210). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, N. J.T. (2014). Mental Imagery. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/mental-imagery/.
  35. Thompson, E. (2007). Look again: Phenomenology and mental imagery. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 137–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tye, M. (1991). The Imagery Debate. Cambridge (MA)/ London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wiesing, L. (1996). Phänomenologie des Bildes nach Edmund Husserl und Jean-Paul Sartre. Phänomenologische Forschungen, 30, 255–281.Google Scholar
  38. Wiesing, L. (2005). Artifizielle Präsenz. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Wollheim, R. (1984). The Thread of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Zhok, A. (2014a). Rappresentazione e realtà. Psicologia fenomenologica dell’immaginario e degli atti rappresentativi. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  41. Zhok, A. (2014b). Spatiality, Imagery and the Paradox of Fictional Emotions. Paradigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica, 3, 143–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie, Residenz—SüdflügelWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations