Effect of Oil Price Volatility on Clean Energy Stock Market Performance

  • Negar FazlollahiEmail author
  • Saeed Ebrahimijam
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


Recently clean energy firms become more attractive for the investors, this leads to the more comprehensive studies in this field. Thus the aim of this study is investigating the impact of oil price volatility on the performance of S&P500 clean energy market by contributing oil price and technology market performance. To explore this relation the Zivot-Andrews test was conducted to check the stationarity of the time series, since a structural break is found during year 2007–2008, and then Bound test co-integration is applied, because of different levels of integration among time series in order to check the probable existence of the long-run relationship in the model. The results indicate that clean energy sector performance converges to its long-run level by 1.09% speed of weekly adjustment. The most magnitude finding of this paper is that, oil price volatility has significant long-run effect on the performance of clean energy sector. However, no significant short-run impact is observable.


Bound test Clean energy stock price Oil price Oil price volatility Technology stock price 


  1. Arouri, M. E. (2011). Does crude oil move stock markets in Europe? A sector investigation. Economic Modelling, 28, 1716–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohl, M. T., Kaufmann, P., & Siklos, P. L. (2015). What drove the mid-2000s explosiveness in alternative energy stock prices? Evidence from U.S., European and global indices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadstock, D. C., Cao , H., & Zhang , D. (2012). Oil shocks and their impact on energy related stocks in China. China Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, S.-S., & Chen, H.-C. (2007). Oil prices and real exchange rates. Energy Economics, 29, 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cong, R.-G., Wei, Y.-M., Jiao, J.-L., & Fan, Y. (2008). Relationships between oil price shocks and stock market: An empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 36, 3544–3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.Google Scholar
  7. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan, Y., & Xu, J.-H. (2011). What has driven oil prices since 2000? A structural change perspective. Energy Economics, 33, 1082–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferderer, P. J. (1996). Oil price volatility and the macroeconomy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 18, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, J. D. (1983). Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Oil prices and the stock prices of alternative energy companies. Energy Economics, 30, 998–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, R. D., Masulis, R. W., & Stoll, H. R. (1996). Energy shocks and financial markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 16, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar, S., Managi, S., & Matsuda, A. (2012). Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: A vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Economics, 34, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, K., Ni, S., & Ratti, R. A. (1995). Oil shocks and the macroeconomy: The role of price variability. The Energy Journal, 16, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Managi, S., & Okimoto, T. (2013). Does the price of oil interact with clean energy prices in the stock market? Japan and the World Economy, 27, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Milonas, N. T., & Henker, T. (2001). Price spread and convenience yield behaviour in the international oil market. Applied Financial Economics, 11, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37, 1979–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nieh, C.-C., & Wang, Y.-S. (2005). ARDL approach to the exchange rate overshooting in Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 25, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park, J., & Ratti, R. A. (2008). Oil price shocks and stock markets in the U.S. and 13 European countries. Energy Economics, 30, 2587–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds tesing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radchenko, S. (2005). Oil price volatility and the asymmetric response of gasoline prices to oil price increases and decreases. Energy Economics, 27, 708–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadorsky, P. (1999). Oil price shocks and stock market activity. Energy Economics, 21, 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadorsky, P. (2006). Modeling and forecasting petroleum futures volatility. Energy Economics, 28, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sadorsky, P. (2012). Correlations and volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock prices of clean energy and technology companies. Energy Economics, 34, 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, C. W., Hwang, M. J., & Huang, B. N. (2002). An analysis of factors affecting price volatility of the US oil market. Energy Economics, 24, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesisl. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 251–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Banking and FinanceEastern Mediterranean UniversityFamagustaTurkey

Personalised recommendations