Abstract
This chapter starts with a description of emergence and change within the 3D printing field. I analytically distinguish three different phases of transformation and trace their particular impacts on the field’s structure and its constituting issue. Indeed, especially the case of Makerbot and its decision to abandon the open source approach from the core of their business model caused a stir in within the field. I thus derive a taxonomy of opposing codes that delineates community and business stances within the dilemma of entrepreneurship. In order to explore the practical responses of actors that face this dilemma, I analyze interviews that I conducted with founders of 2nd generation community spin-offs, which already took the consequences of the Makerbot controversy into account to inform their own business strategies. It turns out that these actors are highly aware of the challenging contexts for their entrepreneurial efforts and thus try to incorporate aspects from both community and business realms within the business models of their RepRap-related startups.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To avoid legal constrains, the RepRap developers introduced the term of “Fused Filament Fabrication” as an equivalent to the Stratasys’ FDM trademark (see: http://reprap.org/wiki/Fused_filament_fabrication).
- 2.
As a reaction to the related forum discussion Smith and the RRRF board slightly altered the wording of the membership rules as follows: “Members agree to use all hardware supplied to them by the RRRF for research purposes only and not to use it for commercial gain. This restriction is limited just to the supplied hardware; anything made or derived from it is not subject to any restriction by the RRRF.” (Collins 2008, my italics). Generally, this early forum thread already pointed towards the contradictions that reached the project in its diversification phase.
- 3.
Although there have of course been hobbyist approaches to metal- or woodworking and even tinkering in electronics before, the “Maker Movement” represents a renaissance of such “do-it-yourself” (DIY) modes of personal production/invention. Related dynamics started around 2005, have its roots in the US and are interdependently linked to the efforts of O’Reilly Media (resp. its later spin-off Maker Media), which is the publisher of the “Make Magazine” as well as the organizer of associated events called “Maker Faires”. Today, there are more than 100 hundred Maker Faires per year, which are dispersed all around the world. In 2013, the original Maker Faire event was held in San Mateo, CA with 900 exhibiting makers and 120,000 people in attendance (http://makerfairedc.com/about/). In 2014, Barack Obama hosted a Maker Faire at the White House in Washington D.C., where he also raised a call to action to create a “Nation of Makers” (https://www.whitehouse.gov/nation-of-makers).
- 4.
To mention as a side fact, when Zach Smith announced Makerbot on the RepRap Blog, Adrian Bowyer declares, as he said “in the interests of openness and letting everyone know what’s going on” that he is one of the investors in Makerbot. Thus, he also had a personal interest in whishing them good luck (see Bowyer’s comment below Smith 2009).
- 5.
The term “derivative” is very common within the RepRap community. It is used to describe iterations and further developments of former, already existing RepRap devices, which usually incorporate gradual technological deviations from previous models.
- 6.
In this context, the terminology of “kickstarted” refers to entrepreneurial activities that engage in crowdfunding campaigns in platforms like kickstarter.com in order to raise funds for the realization of a certain product or project. The “TangeBot” campaign mentioned above represents one example for this practice.
References
Anderson C (2010) In the next industrial revolution, atoms are the new bits. WIRED, January 25. http://www.wired.com/2010/01/ff_newrevolution/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Bailard S (2006) The ‘Fab @ Home’ Project. RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2006/10/fab-home-project.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Benchoff B (2012) TangiBot and the perils of open source hardware. Hackaday. http://hackaday.com/2012/08/10/tangibot-and-the-perils-of-open-source-hardware/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Bowyer A (2004) Wealth without money – RepRapWiki. Regularly updated wiki page on the background to the Bath Replicating Rapid Prototyper Project. 2011. http://reprap.org/wiki/Wealth_Without_Money. Accessed 5 May 2016
Bowyer A (2006a) RepRappers of the world unite! RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2006/07/reprappers-of-world-unite.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Bowyer A (2006b) The self-replicating rapid prototyper – manufacturing for the masses. Keynote given to the Seventh National Conference on Rapid Design, Prototyping & Manufacturing (Centre for Rapid Design and Manufacture in High Wycombe, June 2006). http://reprap.org/wiki/PhilosophyPage. Accessed 5 May 2016
Brinks V, Ibert O (2015) Mushrooming entrepreneurship: the dynamic geography of enthusiast-driven innovation. Geoforum 65:363–373. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.007
Collins R (2008) RRRF membership objectionable clause. RepRap Forum. http://forums.reprap.org/read.php?1,8453,8726. Accessed 5 May 2016
Crump SS (1989) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US5121329 A, filed 1989. http://www.google.com/patents/US5121329. Accessed 30 Oct 2015
Dickel S, Ferdinand J-P, Petschow U (2014) Shared machine shops as real-life laboratories. J Peer Prod 5. http://peerproduction.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/shared-machine-shops-as-real-life-laboratories.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016
Flaherty J (2012) Cloning the MakerBot is legal, but does that make it right? WIRED. August 23. http://www.wired.com/2012/08/tangibot-makerbot-clone/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad Manag J 45(1):196–214. doi:10.2307/3069292
Gibb A (2014) Building open source hardware: DIY manufacturing for hackers and makers. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston
Giseburt R (2012) Is one of our open source heroes going closed source? Make: DIY Projects, How-Tos, Electronics, Crafts and Ideas for Makers. September 19. http://makezine.com/2012/09/19/is-one-of-our-open-source-heroes-going-closed-source/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Hive76 (2012) Exclusive: Zach Hoeken on Leaving MakerBot and His Future. Hive76. http://www.hive76.org/hoeken. Accessed 5 May 2016
Hodgson G (2012) A history of RepRap development: posts from the RepRap development blog. http://wiki.labomedia.org/images/a/a5/A_History_of_RepRap_Development.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016
Investopedia (2003) Bootstrap definition. Investopedia. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bootstrap.asp. Accessed 5 May 5 2016
Jones R, Haufe P, Sells E, Iravani P, Olliver V, Palmer C, Bowyer A (2011) RepRap – the replicating rapid prototyper. Robotica 29(01):177–191. doi:10.1017/S026357471000069X
Makerbot Industries (2014) Quick-release extruder. US20140120196 A1, filed 2013 2013, and issued 2014. http://www.google.com/patents/US20140120196
Malone E, Lipson H (2007) Fab@Home: the personal desktop fabricator kit. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):245–255. doi:10.1108/13552540710776197
Olliver V (2006) RepRap at LCA2006. RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2006/01/reprap-at-lca2006.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Pettis B (2010) Open source ethics and dead end derivatives. MakerBot Blog. http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2010/03/25/open-source-ethics-and-dead-end-derivatives. Accessed 5 May 2016
Pettis B (2012a) Fixing misinformation with information. MakerBot Blog. http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2012/09/20/fixing-misinformation-with-information. Accessed 5 May 2016
Pettis B (2012b) Let’s try that again. MakerBot Blog. http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2012/09/24/lets-try-that-again. Accessed 5 May 2016
Pettis B (2012c) Challenges of open source consumer products. Transcript by wpengine, NYC, September 28. http://makerfaire.com/bre-pettis-ohs-challenges-of-open-source-consumer-products/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Prusa J (2012) Open hardware meaning. Josef Prusa – 3D Tisk a Tiskárny. September 20. https://www.reddit.com/r/Reprap/comments/10642q/open_hardware_meaning_josef_prusa/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Ryzik M (2011) MakerBot is a new 3-D printer. The New York Times, May 13. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/14/arts/design/makerbot-is-a-new-3-d-printer.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Sharma R (2013) Why Stratasys Sued Afinia – Forbes. Forbes/Tech. http://www.forbes.com/sites/rakeshsharma/2013/12/03/why-stratasys-sued-afinia/#3eceaac8162f. Accessed 5 May 2016
Smith Z (2007) Announcing the RepRap research foundation. RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2007/05/announcing-reprap-research-foundation_23.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Smith Z (2008) Announcing Thingiverse.com. RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2008/11/announcing-thingiversecom.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Smith Z (2009) Announcing MakerBot Industries. RepRap Blog. http://blog.reprap.org/2009/03/announcing-makerbot-industries.html. Accessed 5 May 2016
Smith Z (2012) MakerBot vs. Open Source – A Founder Perspective. September 21. http://www.hoektronics.com/2012/09/21/makerbot-and-open-source-a-founder-perspective/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Stratasys Inc (1991) 74133656, filed 1991 1991. http://www.trademarkia.com/fdm-74133656.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2015
Strong M (2012) The TangiBot – the Affordable Open Source 3D Printer. Kickstarter TangoBot Campaign. August 8. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mattstrong/the-tangibot-3d-printer-the-affordable-makerbot-re. Accessed 5 May 2016
The Economist (2011) More than just digital quilting. The Economist, December 3. http://www.economist.com/node/21540392. Accessed 5 May 2016
Torrone P (2012) Soapbox: the {Unspoken} rules of open source hardware.” Make: DIY Projects, How-Tos, Electronics, Crafts and Ideas for Makers. February 14. http://makezine.com/2012/02/14/soapbox-the-unspoken-rules-of-open-source-hardware/. Accessed 5 May 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferdinand, JP. (2018). Innovation Communities and the Dilemma of Entrepreneurship in the 3D Printing Field. In: Entrepreneurship in Innovation Communities. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66842-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66842-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66841-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66842-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)