Skip to main content

Innovation Communities and the Dilemma of Entrepreneurship in the 3D Printing Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Entrepreneurship in Innovation Communities

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 1026 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter starts with a description of emergence and change within the 3D printing field. I analytically distinguish three different phases of transformation and trace their particular impacts on the field’s structure and its constituting issue. Indeed, especially the case of Makerbot and its decision to abandon the open source approach from the core of their business model caused a stir in within the field. I thus derive a taxonomy of opposing codes that delineates community and business stances within the dilemma of entrepreneurship. In order to explore the practical responses of actors that face this dilemma, I analyze interviews that I conducted with founders of 2nd generation community spin-offs, which already took the consequences of the Makerbot controversy into account to inform their own business strategies. It turns out that these actors are highly aware of the challenging contexts for their entrepreneurial efforts and thus try to incorporate aspects from both community and business realms within the business models of their RepRap-related startups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To avoid legal constrains, the RepRap developers introduced the term of “Fused Filament Fabrication” as an equivalent to the Stratasys’ FDM trademark (see: http://reprap.org/wiki/Fused_filament_fabrication).

  2. 2.

    As a reaction to the related forum discussion Smith and the RRRF board slightly altered the wording of the membership rules as follows: “Members agree to use all hardware supplied to them by the RRRF for research purposes only and not to use it for commercial gain. This restriction is limited just to the supplied hardware; anything made or derived from it is not subject to any restriction by the RRRF.” (Collins 2008, my italics). Generally, this early forum thread already pointed towards the contradictions that reached the project in its diversification phase.

  3. 3.

    Although there have of course been hobbyist approaches to metal- or woodworking and even tinkering in electronics before, the “Maker Movement” represents a renaissance of such “do-it-yourself” (DIY) modes of personal production/invention. Related dynamics started around 2005, have its roots in the US and are interdependently linked to the efforts of O’Reilly Media (resp. its later spin-off Maker Media), which is the publisher of the “Make Magazine” as well as the organizer of associated events called “Maker Faires”. Today, there are more than 100 hundred Maker Faires per year, which are dispersed all around the world. In 2013, the original Maker Faire event was held in San Mateo, CA with 900 exhibiting makers and 120,000 people in attendance (http://makerfairedc.com/about/). In 2014, Barack Obama hosted a Maker Faire at the White House in Washington D.C., where he also raised a call to action to create a “Nation of Makers” (https://www.whitehouse.gov/nation-of-makers).

  4. 4.

    To mention as a side fact, when Zach Smith announced Makerbot on the RepRap Blog, Adrian Bowyer declares, as he said “in the interests of openness and letting everyone know what’s going on” that he is one of the investors in Makerbot. Thus, he also had a personal interest in whishing them good luck (see Bowyer’s comment below Smith 2009).

  5. 5.

    The term “derivative” is very common within the RepRap community. It is used to describe iterations and further developments of former, already existing RepRap devices, which usually incorporate gradual technological deviations from previous models.

  6. 6.

    In this context, the terminology of “kickstarted” refers to entrepreneurial activities that engage in crowdfunding campaigns in platforms like kickstarter.com in order to raise funds for the realization of a certain product or project. The “TangeBot” campaign mentioned above represents one example for this practice.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferdinand, JP. (2018). Innovation Communities and the Dilemma of Entrepreneurship in the 3D Printing Field. In: Entrepreneurship in Innovation Communities. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66842-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics