Advertisement

Linking Commons, Communities, and Innovation

Chapter
  • 850 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

To approach the institutional tensions that affect innovation communities, this chapter starts out with a reception of the existing body of research in connection with common-pool resources. While initial interpretations of the commons emphasized their implicit vulnerabilities and thus revealed rather tragic notions, especially Ostrom’s insights on self-organized governance instead propose ways in which collective groups that jointly provide common-pool resources can guard themselves against free-riding and private appropriation.

To elaborate the linkages between commons, communities, and innovation further, this chapter proceeds with the state of research associated with topics of open and distributed innovation. My review of related work selectively focuses on available conceptions of the community form as well as the corresponding patterns of “doing” community-based innovations. It is shown that since innovation communities mainly draw on value-based bonds that appreciate openness and accessibility of knowledge as common ground for interaction, any attempt to exploit related outcomes commercially leads to friction. I conceive of these frictions as the “dilemma of entrepreneurship”.

References

  1. Baldwin C, Hienerth C, von Hippel E (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: a theoretical investigation and case study. Res Policy 35(9):1291–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ Sci 22(6):1399–1417. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauwens M (2010) How does the idea of P2P/commonism differ from the socialist tradition? P2P Foundation Weblog 31Google Scholar
  4. Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogers M, West J (2012) Managing distributed innovation: strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity Innov Manag 21(1):61–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00622.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinks V, Ibert O (2015) Mushrooming entrepreneurship: the dynamic geography of enthusiast-driven innovation. Geoforum 65:363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ Sci 2(1):40–57. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organ Sci 12(2):198–213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesbrough H (2006) Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Corbet J, Kroah-Hartman G, McPherson A (2015) Who writes Linux: Linux kernel development: how fast it is going, who is doing it, what they are doing, and who is sponsoring it. Linux Foundation. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/publications/linux-foundation/who-writes-linux-2015. Accessed 5 May 2016
  12. Dahlander L, Magnusson MG (2005) Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from Nordic firms. Res Policy 34(4):481–493. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlander L, Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res Policy 35(8):1243–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DiBona C, Ockman S, Stone M (eds) (1999) Open sources. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobusch L, Gegenhuber T, Bauer RM, Müller-Birn C (2013) Between crowd and community: organizing online collaboration in open innovation and beyond. Acad Manag Proc 2013(1):15842. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.15842abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald B (2006a) The transformation of open source software. MIS Q 30(3):587–598Google Scholar
  17. Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res Policy 32(1):157–178. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedland R, Alford R (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W, Dimaggio P (eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 232–263Google Scholar
  19. Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901. doi: 10.1038/438900a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harhoff D, Mayerhofer P (2010) Managing user communities and hybrid innovation processes: concepts and design implications. Organ Dyn 39(2):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hess C, Ostrom E (2003) Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: information as a common-pool resource. Law Contemp Probl 66(1/2):111–145Google Scholar
  23. Hess C, Ostrom E (2007) Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice. The Mit Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Hutter M, Knoblauch H, Rammert W, Windeler A (2011) Innovation society today: the reflexive creation of novelty. Technical University Technology Studies Working Papers, no. TUTS-WP-4-2011 (engl.). http://www.innovation.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/i62_ifsgktypo3/en_TUTS_WP_4_2011_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016
  25. Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 17(2):248–264. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/17.2.248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lakhani KR, Panetta JA (2007) The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations 2(3):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: the case of the Linux kernel development. Organ Sci 14(6):633–649. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lessig L (2006) Code: and other laws of cyberspace, version 2.0. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Levy S (1994) Hackers: heroes of the computer revolution. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindkvist L (2005) Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups. J Manag Stud 42(6):1189–1210. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00538.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR (2007) Building solidarity through generalized exchange: a theory of reciprocity. Am J Sociol 113(1):205–242. doi: 10.1086/517900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moody G (2001) Rebel code: inside Linux and the open source revolution. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Murray F, O’Mahony S (2007) Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: implications for organization science. Organ Sci 18(6):1006–1021. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Mahony S (2003) Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work. Res Policy 32(7):1179–1198. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Mahony S, Bechky B (2008) Boundary organizations: enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Adm Sci Q 53(3):422–459. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.3.422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raymond ES (2001) The Cathedral & the Bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly Media Inc, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Rolandsson B, Bergquist M, Ljungberg J (2011) Open source in the firm: opening up professional practices of software development. Res Policy 40(4):576–587. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shah S (2005) Open beyond software. In: DiBona C et al (eds) Open sources 2.0: the continuing evolution. O’Reilly Media, Beijing, pp 339–360Google Scholar
  42. Shah S, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: the emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrep J 1(1–2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shirky C (2008) Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stallman R (2010) Free software, free society: selected essays of Richard M. Stallman, 2nd edn. GNU Press, Boston. http://www.gnu.org/doc/fsfs-ii-2.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016
  46. Takahashi N (2000) The emergence of generalized exchange. Am J Sociol 105(4):1105–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. Portfolio Hardcover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manag Sci 32(7):791–805. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. von Hippel E (1987) Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Res Policy 16(6):291–302. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90015-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: issues for organization science. Organ Sci 14(2):209–223. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wasko M, Faraj S (2000) ‘It is what one does’: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J Strateg Inf Syst 9(2–3):155–173. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber M (2005b) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber S (2004) The success of open source. Harvard Univ Pr, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  56. Wenger E, Snyder WM (2000) Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv Bus Rev 78:139–145Google Scholar
  57. West J (2003) How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res Policy Open Source Softw Dev 32(7):1259–1285. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0 Google Scholar
  58. West J, Lakhani K (2008) Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Ind Innov 15(2):223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams S (2002) Free as in freedom: Richard Stallman’s crusade for free software. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische UniversitätBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations