Advertisement

Selection Among Solar Power Plants Using Fuzzy Economics

  • Veysel ÇobanEmail author
  • Sezi Çevik Onar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 641)

Abstract

Alternative energy sources are gaining popularity against the world’s fossil energy sources. There is an increasing energy demand due to the growing population. Renewable energy sources are used as alter-natives for fulfilling this demand. Since these sources are non-exhaustible and can renew themselves, they are considered as primary energy sources for the future. Although solar energy has the highest capacity among renewable energy sources, currently it has the disadvantage of high equipment and installation costs. Therefore, the economic analysis of investments in solar energy systems should be accurate and realistic but the uncertainty and ambiguity inherit in the parameters make this analysis complex and inaccurate. In this work, the solar economic model containing economic and technical uncertainties has been evaluated by using fuzzy logic. Realistic solutions from the developed solar fuzzy economic model direct investors to more accurate solar power plant investments.

References

  1. 1.
    Commission, E.: Energy statistical pocketbook (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_pocketbook.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2017
  2. 2.
    Kalogirou, S.A.: Solar Energy Engineering: Processes and Systems. Academic Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Resources, T.M.o.E.a.N.: Renewable energy resources support mechanism (YEKDEM) (2017). http://www.eie.gov.tr/yenilenebilir/YEKDEM.aspx. Accessed 28 Mar 2017
  4. 4.
    (EIA), U.S.E.I.A.: Renewable and Alternative Fuels (2017). https://www.eia.gov/renewable/. Accessed 28 Mar 2017
  5. 5.
    Çoban, V., Onar, S.Ç.: Modelling renewable energy usage with hesitant fuzzy cognitive map. In: Uncertainty Modelling in Knowledge Engineering and Decision Making. Proceedings of the 12th International FLINS Conference. World Scientific (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duffie, J.A., Beckman, W.A.: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Çoban, V., Onar, S.Ç.: Modelling solar energy usage with fuzzy cognitive maps. In: Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications, pp. 159–187. Springer, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kahraman, C., et al.: Fuzzy economic analysis methods for environmental economics. In: Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications, pp. 315–346. Springer, New york (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 24(1), 65–75 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kahraman, C., Çevik Onar, S., Öztayşi, B.: Engineering economic analyses using intuitionistic and hesitant fuzzy sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29(3), 1151–1168 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blank, L., Tarquin, A.: Basics of Engineering Economy. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Pennsylvania (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Çevik Onar, S.: A comprehensive literature review of 50 years of fuzzy set theory. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9(Suppl. 1), 3–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations