Skip to main content

A Hesitant Fuzzy Based TOPSIS Approach for Smart Glass Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 641))

Abstract

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTS) are applied to better represent decision maker’s (DMs’) preferences in complex situations such as uncertainty in DMs’ opinions and the difficulty about expressing thoughts by numbers. As an important tool, HFLTS presents a novel and strong approach for processing qualitative judgments of DMs. Therefore, this paper develops an approach based on HFLTS, ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator and hesitant fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). A case study about smart glass (SG) evaluation is given to demonstrate the potential of the approach. The originality of the work comes from its evaluation methodology and its use on a case study for a logistics company. The study contributes the smart glass (SG) evaluation literature by introducing the integrated OWA Operator-Hesitant TOPSIS methodology. Since technology selection is an important subject for managers, the proposed methodology can be guided managers for an effective SG evaluation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Demirbaş, A., Durmuş, K., Taylan, O.: An integrated multi attribute decision model for energy efficiency processes in petrochemical industry applying fuzzy set theory. Energy Convers. Manag. 117, 501–512 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, S., Nussbaum, M.A., Gabbard, J.L.: Augmented reality “smart glasses” in the workplace: industry perspectives and challenges for worker safety and health. IIE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Fact. 4, 253–258 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kao, C.H., Yang, C.M., Hsieh, C.H., Hung, Y.S.: Decision making in the design process of wearable IT products. In: 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR), Tokyo, vol. 8, 26–35 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patent landscape analysis, Wearable Technology, Lexinnova

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wearable technology in healthcare: the key to wellness at work. https://insights.samsung.com/2015/09/21/wearable-technology-in-healthcare-the-key-to-wellness-at-work/

  6. Yiwen, G.: An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115(9), 1704–1723 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Threat intelligence report: one in five doctors’ mobile device may be at high risk (2016). http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/blog/Health-IT-Pulse/Threat-intelligence-report-One-in-five-doctors-mobile-device-may-be-at-high-risk

  8. 9 ways wearables could change health and fitness (2015). http://thenextweb.com/entrepreneur/2015/08/11/9-ways-wearables-change-health-fitness-startups/

  9. Boltürk, E., Otay, İ., Senvar, O.: Hospital site selection via hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. IFAC 49(12), 1140–1145 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beg, I., Rashid, R.: TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28, 1162–1171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liao, H., Xu, Z.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 1343–1355 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Y., Xie, A., Wu, Y.: A hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method based on linear programming and TOPSIS. IFAC 48–28, 427–431 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B.: A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: an application to computer workstation selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 1–16 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B.: Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 7, 1002–1021 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, H., Jian-Qiang, W., Hong-Yu, Z., Xiao-Hong, C.: Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 47, 314–327 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, N., Guiwu, W.: Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 4938–4947 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, Z., Zhang, X.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl. Based Syst. 52, 53–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez, R., Liu, H.: A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 258, 220–238 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.J.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 271, 125–142 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi, D., Kumar, S.: Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248, 183–191 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Büyüközkan, G., Işıklar, G.: Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 29, 265–274 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1378–1382 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25, 529–539 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Szidarovszky, F., Zarghami, M.: Fuzzy quantifiers in sensitivity analysis of OWA operator. Comput. Ind. Eng. 54(4), 1006–1018 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18(1), 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L.: A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 43–58 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Dursun, M., Karsak, E.E.: A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 4324–4330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly express their appreciation for the support of industrial experts. This research has received financial support of Galatasaray University Research Fund (Project No: 17.402.004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülçin Büyüközkan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Büyüközkan, G., Güler, M. (2018). A Hesitant Fuzzy Based TOPSIS Approach for Smart Glass Evaluation. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66830-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics